Kremer Thomas, Abé Dorotheé, Weihrauch Marc, Peters Christopher, Gebhardt Martha Maria, Germann Guenter, Heitmann Christoph, Walther Andreas
Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center-BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Plastic and Hand Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Shock. 2008 Oct;30(4):394-400. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181673908.
Thermal injuries greater than 20% body surface area (BSA) result in systemic shock with generalized edema in addition to local tissue destruction. Burn shock is induced by a variety of mediators, mainly immunomodulative cytokines. This experimental study evaluates if burn shock can be induced in healthy rats by transfer of burn plasma (BP) with mediators. Thermal injury was induced by hot water (100 degrees C water, 12 s, 30% BSA) in male syngenic Wistar rats. Donor rats were killed 4 h posttrauma, and BP was harvested. Burn plasma was transferred to healthy animals by continuous intravenous infusion in three types of dilution (100%, 10%, and 1%). Positive controls were directly examined 4 h after thermal injury, and negative control rats had a continuous infusion done with sham burn (SB) plasma (37 degrees C water, 12 s, 30% BSA). Afterwards, intravital fluorescence microscopy was performed in postcapillary mesenteric venules at 0, 60, and 120 min. Edema formation was assessed by relative changes over time in fluorescence intensity of fluorescein isothiocyanate-albumin in the intravascular versus the extravascular space. The interactions of leucocytes and endothelium were evaluated by quantification of leukocyte sticking. Additionally, microhemodynamic (volumetric blood flow, erythrocyte velocity, venular wall shear rate, venular diameters) and macrohemodynamic parameters (blood pressure, heart frequency, temperature) were assessed online (arterial catheter). For statistics, an ANOVA was performed with Bonferroni adjustment procedure. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05. There are no statistically significant differences in microhemodynamics or macrohemodynamics between study groups. Burn plasma infusion and thermal injury lead to significant increases in fluorescein isothiocyanate-albumin extravasation, whereas SB plasma shows no significant changes. Even BP diluted in 0.9% saline (10% and 1%) results in a similar transvascular flux of plasma proteins as direct thermal injury. Differences between positive controls and BP infusion are not significant, whereas all groups are statistically different from the SB group (P<0.05). Leukocyte sticking is significantly increased in all groups except the SB group, and the number of adherent leukocytes is dose dependent. The present study demonstrates that as early as 4 h after thermal injury, there are sufficient factors (e.g., cytokines) in BP to induce systemic burn shock in healthy rats even in diluted plasma (1%). However, the "key" cytokines are not identified at this point. The burned tissue is no longer required for burn shock induction, and the pathophysiologic process seems to be self-perpetuating as early as 4 h posttrauma. Leukocytes are activated by thermal injury and BP infusion. The role of leukocyte-endothelium interactions for edema formation remains uncertain and requires further investigation.
体表面积(BSA)超过20%的热损伤除了导致局部组织破坏外,还会引发全身性休克和全身性水肿。烧伤休克由多种介质引发,主要是免疫调节细胞因子。本实验研究评估了通过输注含有介质的烧伤血浆(BP)能否在健康大鼠中诱导出烧伤休克。采用100℃热水(12秒,30% BSA)对雄性同基因Wistar大鼠造成热损伤。在创伤后4小时处死供体大鼠,采集BP。将烧伤血浆以三种稀释度(100%、10%和1%)通过持续静脉输注转移至健康动物体内。阳性对照组在热损伤后4小时直接进行检查,阴性对照大鼠则用假烧伤(SB)血浆(37℃水,12秒,30% BSA)进行持续输注。之后,在0、60和120分钟时对肠系膜后微静脉进行活体荧光显微镜检查。通过血管内与血管外空间中异硫氰酸荧光素 - 白蛋白荧光强度随时间的相对变化来评估水肿形成。通过定量白细胞黏附来评估白细胞与内皮细胞的相互作用。此外,在线评估微血流动力学参数(容积血流量、红细胞速度、微静脉壁剪切速率、微静脉直径)和宏观血流动力学参数(血压、心率、体温)(动脉插管)。统计学分析采用方差分析及Bonferroni校正程序。当P < 0.05时,差异被认为具有统计学意义。各研究组之间在微血流动力学或宏观血流动力学方面无统计学显著差异。输注烧伤血浆和热损伤均导致异硫氰酸荧光素 - 白蛋白外渗显著增加,而SB血浆则无显著变化。即使是用0.9%生理盐水稀释的BP(10%和1%)也会导致与直接热损伤相似的血浆蛋白跨血管通量。阳性对照组与BP输注组之间的差异不显著,而所有组与SB组在统计学上均有差异(P<0.05)。除SB组外,所有组的白细胞黏附均显著增加,且黏附白细胞数量呈剂量依赖性。本研究表明,热损伤后仅4小时,BP中就存在足够的因子(如细胞因子),即使在稀释血浆(1%)中也能在健康大鼠中诱导出全身性烧伤休克。然而,此时尚未确定“关键”细胞因子。诱导烧伤休克不再需要烧伤组织,病理生理过程似乎在创伤后4小时就开始自我延续。热损伤和BP输注激活了白细胞。白细胞 - 内皮细胞相互作用在水肿形成中的作用仍不确定,需要进一步研究。