• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊拉地平治疗慢性稳定型心绞痛——与硝苯地平的比较。

Isradipine therapy in chronic stable angina pectoris--comparison with nifedipine.

作者信息

Currie P, Saltissi S

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Royal Liverpool Hospital, U.K.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 1991 Jul;12(7):807-12. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/12.7.807.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/12.7.807
PMID:1832382
Abstract

Current available calcium antagonists, although useful in angina pectoris, are often poorly tolerated. We therefore compared isradipine, a new calcium antagonist, with nifedipine in 18 patients with angina. Patients sequentially received incremental doses of either isradipine (IS) 2.5-7.5 mg three times daily or nifedipine (NF) 10-30 mg three times daily for 6 weeks each, in a randomized double-blind crossover study. Both agents produced similar (P = 0.43) increases in maximum exercise duration (IS + 30%; NF + 34%) and an equivalent (P = 0.38) increase in time to onset of angina on exercise (IS + 53%; NF + 62%). Both IS and NF significantly reduced exercise-induced ST depression (-40% and -45%) to a similar degree (P = 0.48). NF significantly (P = 0.019) reduced angina attacks (-3.0 attacks.week-1; 26%) compared to IS (-0.4; 4%) whilst a similar but non-significant trend in favour of NF was also apparent in the consumption of sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (-0.1 tablets.week-1; 2% vs +1.3.week-1; 23%; P = 0.28). However, significantly (P less than 0.03) more patients experienced adverse events whilst taking NF than with IS (36 events in 16/18 (89%) v 18 in 9/18 (50%). Thus, IS and NF increased exercise tolerance and reduced exercise angina and ST depression equally well although NF use was associated with fewer anginal episodes and IS with fewer side effects.

摘要

目前可用的钙拮抗剂尽管对心绞痛有效,但耐受性往往较差。因此,我们在18例心绞痛患者中比较了新型钙拮抗剂伊拉地平与硝苯地平的疗效。在一项随机双盲交叉研究中,患者依次接受递增剂量的伊拉地平(IS)2.5 - 7.5毫克,每日3次或硝苯地平(NF)10 - 30毫克,每日3次,各治疗6周。两种药物使最大运动持续时间增加程度相似(P = 0.43)(IS增加30%;NF增加34%),运动时心绞痛发作时间增加程度相当(P = 0.38)(IS增加53%;NF增加62%)。IS和NF均能使运动诱发的ST段压低显著降低(分别降低40%和45%),程度相似(P = 0.48)。与IS相比,NF能显著(P = 0.019)减少心绞痛发作次数(从每周3.0次减少至26%),而IS为(从每周0.4次减少至4%),同时在舌下含服硝酸甘油的用量方面,也有类似但不显著的有利于NF的趋势(从每周1.3片减少至23%,而IS从每周0.1片减少至2%;P = 0.28)。然而,服用NF时出现不良事件的患者显著多于服用IS的患者(16/18例(89%)出现36次不良事件,而9/18例(50%)出现18次)(P<0.03)。因此,IS和NF在提高运动耐力、减轻运动性心绞痛和ST段压低方面效果相当,尽管使用NF时心绞痛发作次数较少,而使用IS时副作用较少。

相似文献

1
Isradipine therapy in chronic stable angina pectoris--comparison with nifedipine.伊拉地平治疗慢性稳定型心绞痛——与硝苯地平的比较。
Eur Heart J. 1991 Jul;12(7):807-12. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/12.7.807.
2
Comparison of isradipine and nifedipine in chronic stable angina.
Int J Cardiol. 1988 Jan;18(1):15-26. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(88)90026-5.
3
Effects of the calcium antagonist, isradipine, and nifedipine on resting and exercise haemodynamics and the neurohumoral system in patients with stable chronic angina.钙拮抗剂伊拉地平与硝苯地平对稳定型慢性心绞痛患者静息及运动时血液动力学和神经体液系统的影响。
Eur Heart J. 1990 May;11(5):454-61. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059729.
4
Combination therapy with metoprolol and nifedipine versus monotherapy in patients with stable angina pectoris. Results of the International Multicenter Angina Exercise (IMAGE) Study.美托洛尔与硝苯地平联合治疗与单药治疗稳定型心绞痛患者的疗效比较。国际多中心心绞痛运动(IMAGE)研究结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Feb;27(2):311-6. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00489-0.
5
Efficacy of the calcium antagonist isradipine in angina pectoris.钙拮抗剂伊拉地平治疗心绞痛的疗效。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1988 Mar;1(6):661-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02125752.
6
[Comparative study to assess the efficacy and adverse effects of amlodipine and nifedipine retard in patients with stable exertional angina and hypertension].[评估氨氯地平和硝苯地平缓释片对稳定型劳力性心绞痛合并高血压患者疗效及不良反应的对比研究]
Przegl Lek. 1997;54(5):324-8.
7
Interim report of multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of nifedipine in chronic stable angina.硝苯地平治疗慢性稳定型心绞痛多中心双盲安慰剂对照研究的中期报告
Am J Med. 1981 Oct;71(4):645-57. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90229-1.
8
Comparative efficacy of nicardipine, a new calcium antagonist, versus nifedipine in stable effort angina.新型钙拮抗剂尼卡地平与硝苯地平治疗稳定型劳力性心绞痛的疗效比较
Int J Cardiol. 1984 Dec;6(6):673-88. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(84)90293-6.
9
Safety and efficacy of isradipine, alone and in combination, in the treatment of angina pectoris.伊拉地平单独及联合用药治疗心绞痛的安全性和有效性。
Am J Med. 1989 Apr 17;86(4A):70-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90195-2.
10
[Amlodipine versus nifedipine retard. A randomized double-blind comparative study on long-term efficacy and safety of amlodipine and nifedipine retard in the monotherapy of chronic stable angina pectoris].氨氯地平与硝苯地平缓释片。氨氯地平与硝苯地平缓释片单药治疗慢性稳定型心绞痛的长期疗效与安全性随机双盲对照研究
Herz. 2001 Mar;26(2):149-56. doi: 10.1007/pl00002015.