Suppr超能文献

伊拉地平治疗慢性稳定型心绞痛——与硝苯地平的比较。

Isradipine therapy in chronic stable angina pectoris--comparison with nifedipine.

作者信息

Currie P, Saltissi S

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Royal Liverpool Hospital, U.K.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 1991 Jul;12(7):807-12. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/12.7.807.

Abstract

Current available calcium antagonists, although useful in angina pectoris, are often poorly tolerated. We therefore compared isradipine, a new calcium antagonist, with nifedipine in 18 patients with angina. Patients sequentially received incremental doses of either isradipine (IS) 2.5-7.5 mg three times daily or nifedipine (NF) 10-30 mg three times daily for 6 weeks each, in a randomized double-blind crossover study. Both agents produced similar (P = 0.43) increases in maximum exercise duration (IS + 30%; NF + 34%) and an equivalent (P = 0.38) increase in time to onset of angina on exercise (IS + 53%; NF + 62%). Both IS and NF significantly reduced exercise-induced ST depression (-40% and -45%) to a similar degree (P = 0.48). NF significantly (P = 0.019) reduced angina attacks (-3.0 attacks.week-1; 26%) compared to IS (-0.4; 4%) whilst a similar but non-significant trend in favour of NF was also apparent in the consumption of sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (-0.1 tablets.week-1; 2% vs +1.3.week-1; 23%; P = 0.28). However, significantly (P less than 0.03) more patients experienced adverse events whilst taking NF than with IS (36 events in 16/18 (89%) v 18 in 9/18 (50%). Thus, IS and NF increased exercise tolerance and reduced exercise angina and ST depression equally well although NF use was associated with fewer anginal episodes and IS with fewer side effects.

摘要

目前可用的钙拮抗剂尽管对心绞痛有效,但耐受性往往较差。因此,我们在18例心绞痛患者中比较了新型钙拮抗剂伊拉地平与硝苯地平的疗效。在一项随机双盲交叉研究中,患者依次接受递增剂量的伊拉地平(IS)2.5 - 7.5毫克,每日3次或硝苯地平(NF)10 - 30毫克,每日3次,各治疗6周。两种药物使最大运动持续时间增加程度相似(P = 0.43)(IS增加30%;NF增加34%),运动时心绞痛发作时间增加程度相当(P = 0.38)(IS增加53%;NF增加62%)。IS和NF均能使运动诱发的ST段压低显著降低(分别降低40%和45%),程度相似(P = 0.48)。与IS相比,NF能显著(P = 0.019)减少心绞痛发作次数(从每周3.0次减少至26%),而IS为(从每周0.4次减少至4%),同时在舌下含服硝酸甘油的用量方面,也有类似但不显著的有利于NF的趋势(从每周1.3片减少至23%,而IS从每周0.1片减少至2%;P = 0.28)。然而,服用NF时出现不良事件的患者显著多于服用IS的患者(16/18例(89%)出现36次不良事件,而9/18例(50%)出现18次)(P<0.03)。因此,IS和NF在提高运动耐力、减轻运动性心绞痛和ST段压低方面效果相当,尽管使用NF时心绞痛发作次数较少,而使用IS时副作用较少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验