Sankaran V, Schönenberger K, Walsh J T, Maitland D J
Medical Technology Program, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA.
Appl Opt. 1999 Jul 1;38(19):4252-61. doi: 10.1364/ao.38.004252.
We describe the use of degree of polarization to discriminate unscattered and weakly scattered light from multiply scattered light in an optically turbid material. We use spatially resolved measurements of the degree of polarization to compare how well linearly and circularly polarized light survives in a sample. Experiments were performed on common tissue phantoms consisting of polystyrene and Intralipid microsphere suspensions and on adipose and arterial tissue. The results indicate that polarization is maintained even after unpolarized irradiance through each sample has been extinguished by several orders of magnitude. The results also show that polarized light propagation in common tissue phantoms is distinctly different from polarized light propagation in the two tissues investigated. Further, these experiments illustrate when polarization is an effective discrimination criterion and when it is not. The potential of a polarization-based discrimination scheme to image through the biological and nonbiological samples investigated here is also discussed.
我们描述了利用偏振度来区分光学浑浊材料中未散射和弱散射光与多次散射光的方法。我们使用空间分辨的偏振度测量来比较线偏振光和圆偏振光在样品中的存活情况。实验是在由聚苯乙烯和脂质微球悬浮液组成的常见组织模型以及脂肪组织和动脉组织上进行的。结果表明,即使在未偏振辐照度通过每个样品被消光几个数量级之后,偏振仍得以保持。结果还表明,常见组织模型中的偏振光传播与所研究的两种组织中的偏振光传播明显不同。此外,这些实验说明了偏振何时是有效的区分标准,何时不是。还讨论了基于偏振的区分方案对本文所研究的生物和非生物样品进行成像的潜力。