Vadde V, Kumar B V
Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Data Storage Systems Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
Appl Opt. 1999 Jul 10;38(20):4374-86. doi: 10.1364/ao.38.004374.
We present two different channel models (the magnitude model and the intensity model) for a pixel-matched volume holographic data storage system that employs the 4-focal-length architecture. First, a framework to describe the channel models is developed. We evaluate the linearity of the channel models by comparing data values obtained from diffraction-limited interference with data values predicted by the channel models. The models are evaluated for linearity and equalization gain under different storage and read-back conditions, such as fill factors, apertures, and contrast ratios. Bit error rate results obtained by use of linear equalization methods in conjunction with the channel models developed are also presented. Our results suggest that the magnitude model leads to better performance when the fill factors are small, whereas the intensity model appears to be more appropriate for the high-fill-factor cases. The magnitude model, when suitable, appears to provide a storage density improvement of as great as 65%, whereas the intensity model seems capable of providing as much as 15% density gain through deconvolution. The optimum aperture for storage seems to be close to the Nyquist aperture.
我们为采用4焦距架构的像素匹配体全息数据存储系统提出了两种不同的通道模型(幅度模型和强度模型)。首先,开发了一个描述通道模型的框架。我们通过将衍射极限干涉获得的数据值与通道模型预测的数据值进行比较,来评估通道模型的线性度。在不同的存储和回读条件下,如填充因子、孔径和对比度,对模型的线性度和均衡增益进行评估。还给出了结合所开发的通道模型使用线性均衡方法获得的误码率结果。我们的结果表明,当填充因子较小时,幅度模型性能更佳,而强度模型似乎更适用于高填充因子情况。幅度模型在适用时,似乎能使存储密度提高多达65%,而强度模型通过反卷积似乎能够提供高达15%的密度增益。存储的最佳孔径似乎接近奈奎斯特孔径。