Willens Howard J, Chirinos Julio A, Gomez-Marin Orlando, Fertel Debra P, Ghany Reyan A, Alfonso Carlos E, Hare Joshua M
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008 Jun;21(6):715-9. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.10.003. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
To determine whether pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and pulmonary venous hypertension (PVH) can be differentiated noninvasively, we reviewed data on 44 patients with pulmonary artery systolic pressure greater than or equal to 40 mm Hg by echocardiography and cardiac catheterization performed within 7 days of each other. Based on left ventricular end-diastolic pressure or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, 20 patients were classified as having PVH and 24 as having PAH. Early (E) and late (A) diastolic mitral inflow velocities, deceleration time, early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E'), and E/A and E/E' ratios were remeasured in the two groups. Compared with patients with PAH, those with PVH had significantly higher E (107.8 +/- 27.3 vs 65.0 +/- 24.0 cm/s, P < .001), E/A (2.4 +/- 1.0 vs 0.9 +/- 0.4, P < .001), and E/E' (14.3 +/- 4.3 vs 5.1 +/- 1.9, P < .001), and significantly lower A (55.5 +/- 33.5 vs 74.1 +/- 20.8 cm/s, P < .001), E' (8.0 +/- 2.5 vs 13.1 +/- 3.6 cm/s, P = .001), and deceleration time (148.5 +/- 49.0 vs 192.3 +/- 41.9 milliseconds, P = .003). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 97% for E/E' and 91% for E/A. Optimal cutoff for diagnosing PVH was 9.2 for E/E' (sensitivity 95%, specificity 96%) and 1.7 for E/A (sensitivity 75%, specificity 91%). PAH and PVH may be differentiated by readily obtainable conventional and tissue Doppler parameters.
为了确定肺动脉高压(PAH)和肺静脉高压(PVH)能否通过无创方法进行鉴别,我们回顾了44例经超声心动图检查且在7天内进行心脏导管检查,肺动脉收缩压大于或等于40 mmHg患者的数据。根据左心室舒张末期压力或肺毛细血管楔压,20例患者被归类为患有PVH,24例被归类为患有PAH。重新测量了两组患者舒张早期(E)和晚期(A)二尖瓣流入速度、减速时间、舒张早期二尖瓣环速度(E')以及E/A和E/E'比值。与PAH患者相比,PVH患者的E(107.8±27.3 vs 65.0±24.0 cm/s,P<.001)、E/A(2.4±1.0 vs 0.9±0.4,P<.001)和E/E'(14.3±4.3 vs 5.1±1.9,P<.001)显著更高,而A(55.5±33.5 vs 74.1±20.8 cm/s,P<.001)、E'(8.0±2.5 vs 13.1±3.6 cm/s,P=.001)和减速时间(148.5±49.0 vs 192.3±41.9毫秒,P=.003)显著更低。E/E'的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为97%,E/A为91%。诊断PVH的最佳截断值E/E'为9.2(敏感性95%,特异性96%),E/A为1.7(敏感性75%,特异性91%)。PAH和PVH可通过易于获得的传统和组织多普勒参数进行鉴别。