Dora Claudio, Burckhardt Kathrin, Székely Gábor, Rousson Valentin, Hodler Juerg, Gerber Christian
Department of Orthopedics, University of Zurich, Balgrist, Forchstrasse 340, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
J Orthop Res. 2008 Aug;26(8):1121-6. doi: 10.1002/jor.20643.
Precision is important if small polyethylene wear rates are to be detected early and in small sample sizes. Using an automatic, computerized algorithm relying on a synthetic X-ray generated from a computer-assisted design (CAD) model of the implant may significantly improve precision of linear wear measurements. We compared this method to provide improved in vivo precision compared to the widely used Hip Analysis Suite software (version 8.0.1.7). Two anterior-posterior pelvic X-rays were taken on the same day of 18 total hip implants, and wear was measured by three observers using the two methods. Expected real wear was zero and defined as a reference value. Two sources of variability were estimated: one due to the instrument, and one due to different operators. A Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used for statistical comparisons. The overall precision (instrument variability and multioperator variability) given a 95% precision limit was significantly higher (p < 0.001) using the proposed method (+/-0.15 mm) when compared to the Hip Analysis Suite (+/-0.84 mm). Due to the availability of the full CAD data of the implant and to further automation of the measuring process, the newly proposed method provided improved precision in measuring polyethylene wear.
如果要早期检测出小的聚乙烯磨损率并针对小样本量进行检测,精度很重要。使用一种基于植入物计算机辅助设计(CAD)模型生成的合成X射线的自动计算机算法,可能会显著提高线性磨损测量的精度。我们将这种方法与广泛使用的髋关节分析套件软件(8.0.1.7版)进行比较,以提高体内测量精度。在同一天对18个全髋关节植入物拍摄了两张前后位骨盆X光片,由三名观察者使用这两种方法测量磨损情况。预期实际磨损为零,并将其定义为参考值。估计了两种变异性来源:一种是由于仪器,另一种是由于不同的操作人员。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行统计学比较。与髋关节分析套件(±0.84 mm)相比,使用所提出的方法(±0.15 mm)时,在95%精度限值下的总体精度(仪器变异性和多操作人员变异性)显著更高(p < 0.001)。由于植入物完整CAD数据的可用性以及测量过程的进一步自动化,新提出的方法在测量聚乙烯磨损方面提供了更高的精度。