• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

静脉血栓栓塞事件风险增加的内科住院患者中肾衰竭的患病率及抗血栓预防措施的使用情况。

Prevalence of renal failure and use of antithrombotic prophylaxis among medical inpatients at increased risk of venous thromboembolic events.

作者信息

Dentali Francesco, Riva Nicoletta, Gianni Monica, Malato Alessandra, Bozzato Silvia, Bernasconi Matteo, Tuttolomondo Antonino, Romano Adele, Pinto Antonio, Siragusa Sergio, Ageno Walter

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine, Insubria University, Varese, Italy.

出版信息

Thromb Res. 2008;123(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.01.009. Epub 2008 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2008.01.009
PMID:18328541
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based guidelines recommend the use of antithrombotic prophylaxis in medical patients at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are usually preferred to unfractionated heparin. However, when prophylactic doses of LMWH are administered, patients with renal failure (RF) are exposed to the risk of excessive accumulation, and thus to an increased risk of bleeding. We aimed to assess the prevalence of RF among medical inpatients at increased risk of VTE and the use and dosage of antithrombotic prophylaxis in these patients.

METHODS

In a cross sectional study carried out at three different hospitals, information on all medical inpatients was collected. Patients were defined at increased risk of VTE according to the American College of Chest Physicians guidelines. Data on the proportion of patients with renal RF, on the use and dosage of antithrombotic prophylaxis, and on the presence of contraindications to antithrombotic therapy were ascertained.

RESULTS

439 hospital charts were examined; 158 patients (36.0%) were defined at increased risk of VTE and had no contraindications to antithrombotic treatment. Thromboprophylaxis was prescribed to 61.4% of these patients. Eighty (50.7%) of them also had moderate or severe RF. There was no difference in the rate of prescription nor in the doses of antithrombotic prophylaxis between patients with and without RF (p=0.81 and p=0.94, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

RF is frequently present in medical patients at risk of VTE. A considerable proportion of these patients may not receive the optimal type or dose of antithrombotic prophylaxis.

摘要

背景

循证指南推荐对有静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险的内科患者进行抗血栓预防。低分子量肝素(LMWHs)通常比普通肝素更受青睐。然而,当给予预防剂量的LMWH时,肾衰竭(RF)患者有药物过度蓄积的风险,从而有出血风险增加。我们旨在评估VTE风险增加的内科住院患者中RF的患病率以及这些患者抗血栓预防的使用情况和剂量。

方法

在三家不同医院开展的一项横断面研究中,收集了所有内科住院患者的信息。根据美国胸科医师学会指南,将患者定义为VTE风险增加。确定了肾衰竭患者的比例、抗血栓预防的使用和剂量以及抗血栓治疗禁忌证的存在情况。

结果

检查了439份医院病历;158例患者(36.0%)被定义为VTE风险增加且无抗血栓治疗禁忌证。这些患者中有61.4%接受了血栓预防治疗。其中80例(50.7%)也有中度或重度RF。有RF和无RF的患者在抗血栓预防的处方率和剂量方面均无差异(分别为p = 0.81和p = 0.94)。

结论

RF在有VTE风险的内科患者中很常见。这些患者中有相当一部分可能未接受最佳类型或剂量的抗血栓预防治疗。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of renal failure and use of antithrombotic prophylaxis among medical inpatients at increased risk of venous thromboembolic events.静脉血栓栓塞事件风险增加的内科住院患者中肾衰竭的患病率及抗血栓预防措施的使用情况。
Thromb Res. 2008;123(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.01.009. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
2
In-hospital symptomatic venous thromboembolism and antithrombotic prophylaxis in Internal Medicine. Findings from a multicenter, prospective study.内科住院患者的症状性静脉血栓栓塞及抗栓预防。一项多中心前瞻性研究的结果
Thromb Haemost. 2009 May;101(5):893-901.
3
Optimal dosing of bemiparin as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in surgery for cancer: an audit of practice.贝米肝素在癌症手术中预防静脉血栓栓塞的最佳剂量:实践审核
Int J Surg. 2007 Apr;5(2):114-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.07.005. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
4
[Thromboembolic prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients].[住院内科患者的血栓栓塞预防]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007 May 3;127(9):1177-80.
5
[Thromboembolic risk and prophylaxis in hospitalized surgical and internal medicine patients. German results of the international ENDORSE study].[住院手术及内科患者的血栓栓塞风险与预防。国际ENDORSE研究的德国结果]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009 Oct;134(43):2163-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1241924. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
6
[Assessing the use of low-molecular-weight heparins fo venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in internal medicine patients].[评估低分子量肝素在内科患者中预防静脉血栓栓塞的应用]
Farm Hosp. 2004 Nov-Dec;28(6):402-9.
7
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized heart failure patients.住院心力衰竭患者的静脉血栓栓塞预防
J Card Fail. 2008 Mar;14(2):127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2007.10.017.
8
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medical ICU patients in Asia (VOICE Asia): a multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study.亚洲内科重症监护病房患者静脉血栓栓塞症预防(VOICE Asia):一项多中心、观察性、横断面研究。
Thromb Res. 2012 Apr;129(4):e152-8. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.01.012. Epub 2012 Feb 11.
9
Extended thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparins after hospital discharge in high-risk surgical and medical patients: a review.高危外科和内科患者出院后使用低分子量肝素进行延长血栓预防:一项综述
Clin Ther. 2009 Jun;31(6):1129-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.06.002.
10
Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in hospitalised medically ill patients. The ENDORSE Global Survey.静脉血栓栓塞风险与住院内科患者的预防。ENDORSE 全球调查。
Thromb Haemost. 2010 Apr;103(4):736-48. doi: 10.1160/TH09-09-0667. Epub 2010 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Improved utilisation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in renal-impaired patients following a clinical pharmacist intervention.临床药师干预后,改善肾功能损害患者的静脉血栓栓塞症预防治疗的应用。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2022 Jan;29(1):40-43. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-002030. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
2
Prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients: focus on the clinical utility of (low-dose) fondaparinux.急性病住院内科患者静脉血栓栓塞的预防:聚焦(低剂量)磺达肝癸钠的临床应用价值
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013 Sep 16;7:973-80. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S38042. eCollection 2013.
3
The AVAIL ME study: a multinational survey of VTE risk and prophylaxis.
AVAIL ME 研究:静脉血栓栓塞风险和预防的跨国调查。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2011 Jan;31(1):47-56. doi: 10.1007/s11239-010-0492-2.