• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内科住院患者的症状性静脉血栓栓塞及抗栓预防。一项多中心前瞻性研究的结果

In-hospital symptomatic venous thromboembolism and antithrombotic prophylaxis in Internal Medicine. Findings from a multicenter, prospective study.

作者信息

Gussoni Gualberto, Campanini Mauro, Silingardi Mauro, Scannapieco Gianluigi, Mazzone Antonino, Magni Giovanna, Valerio Antonella, Iori Ido, Ageno Walter

机构信息

FADOI - Centro Studi, Via G.B. Bazzoni 8, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Thromb Haemost. 2009 May;101(5):893-901.

PMID:19404543
Abstract

Hospitalised medical patients are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but the incidence of hospitalisation-related VTE in unselected medical inpatients has not been extensively studied, and uncertainties remain about the optimal use of thromboprophylaxis in this setting. Aims of our prospective, observational study were to assess the prevalence of VTE and the incidence of symptomatic, hospitalisation-related events in a cohort of consecutive patients admitted to 27 Internal Medicine Departments, and to evaluate clinical factors associated with the use of thromboprophylaxis. Between March and September 2006, a total of 4,846 patients were included in the study. Symptomatic VTE with onset of symptoms later than 48 hours after admission ("hospital-acquired" events, primary study end-point) occurred in 26 patients (0.55%), while the overall prevalence of VTE (including diagnosis prior to or at admission) was 3.65%. During hospital stay antithrombotic prophylaxis was administered in 41.6% of patients, and in 58.7% of those for whom prophylaxis was recommended according to the 2004 Guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians. The choice of administering thromboprophylaxis or not appeared qualitatively adherent to indications from randomised clinical trials and international guidelines, and bed rest was the strongest determinant of the use of prophylaxis. Data from our real-world study confirm that VTE is a relevant complication in patients admitted to Internal Medicine Departments, and recommended tromboprophylaxis is still under-used, in particular in some patients groups. Further efforts are needed to better define risk profile and to optimise prophylaxis in the heterogeneous setting of medical inpatients.

摘要

住院内科患者发生静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的风险增加,但在未经过筛选的内科住院患者中,与住院相关的VTE发病率尚未得到广泛研究,并且在这种情况下预防血栓形成的最佳用药仍存在不确定性。我们这项前瞻性观察性研究的目的是评估在27个内科科室连续收治的一组患者中VTE的患病率以及有症状的、与住院相关事件的发生率,并评估与预防血栓形成用药相关的临床因素。2006年3月至9月期间,共有4846例患者纳入本研究。症状性VTE(症状在入院后48小时后出现,即“医院获得性”事件,为主要研究终点)发生在26例患者中(0.55%),而VTE的总体患病率(包括入院前或入院时诊断出的)为3.65%。住院期间,41.6%的患者接受了抗血栓预防治疗,在根据美国胸科医师学会2004年指南建议应接受预防治疗的患者中,这一比例为58.7%。是否进行血栓预防的选择在质量上似乎符合随机临床试验和国际指南的指征,卧床休息是预防用药的最强决定因素。我们这项真实世界研究的数据证实,VTE是内科住院患者的一种相关并发症,推荐的血栓预防措施仍未得到充分应用,尤其是在一些患者群体中。需要进一步努力,以更好地确定风险特征,并在内科住院患者这种异质性环境中优化预防措施。

相似文献

1
In-hospital symptomatic venous thromboembolism and antithrombotic prophylaxis in Internal Medicine. Findings from a multicenter, prospective study.内科住院患者的症状性静脉血栓栓塞及抗栓预防。一项多中心前瞻性研究的结果
Thromb Haemost. 2009 May;101(5):893-901.
2
Incidence and predictors of venous thromboembolism in post-acute care patients. A prospective cohort study.急性后期护理患者静脉血栓栓塞症的发生率及预测因素。一项前瞻性队列研究。
Thromb Haemost. 2010 Oct;104(4):734-40. doi: 10.1160/TH10-03-0169. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
3
Real-world economic burden of venous thromboembolism and antithrombotic prophylaxis in medical inpatients.真实世界中医疗住院患者静脉血栓栓塞症与抗栓预防的经济负担。
Thromb Res. 2013 Jan;131(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.10.008. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
4
A retrospective review of the use of thromboprophylaxis in patients who subsequently developed a venous thromboembolism after discharge from hospital.对出院后发生静脉血栓栓塞症的患者进行血栓预防治疗的回顾性研究。
N Z Med J. 2010 Feb 19;123(1309):37-49.
5
Prevalence of renal failure and use of antithrombotic prophylaxis among medical inpatients at increased risk of venous thromboembolic events.静脉血栓栓塞事件风险增加的内科住院患者中肾衰竭的患病率及抗血栓预防措施的使用情况。
Thromb Res. 2008;123(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.01.009. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
6
Optimal dosing of bemiparin as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in surgery for cancer: an audit of practice.贝米肝素在癌症手术中预防静脉血栓栓塞的最佳剂量:实践审核
Int J Surg. 2007 Apr;5(2):114-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.07.005. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
7
Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in hospitalised medically ill patients. The ENDORSE Global Survey.静脉血栓栓塞风险与住院内科患者的预防。ENDORSE 全球调查。
Thromb Haemost. 2010 Apr;103(4):736-48. doi: 10.1160/TH09-09-0667. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
8
[Thromboembolic risk and prophylaxis in hospitalized surgical and internal medicine patients. German results of the international ENDORSE study].[住院手术及内科患者的血栓栓塞风险与预防。国际ENDORSE研究的德国结果]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009 Oct;134(43):2163-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1241924. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
9
[Thromboembolic prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients].[住院内科患者的血栓栓塞预防]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007 May 3;127(9):1177-80.
10
Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute care hospital setting (ENDORSE survey): findings in surgical patients.急性医疗机构静脉血栓栓塞风险与预防(ENDORSE 调查):外科患者的调查结果。
Ann Surg. 2010 Feb;251(2):330-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c0e58f.

引用本文的文献

1
The Use of Risk Scores for Thromboprophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients-Rationale and Design of the RICO trial.内科疾病患者血栓预防风险评分的应用——RICO试验的原理与设计
TH Open. 2024 Jan 12;8(1):e55-e60. doi: 10.1055/a-2209-4708. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
The prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in medical outpatients: results of a survey among italian general practitioners.静脉血栓栓塞症预防在医疗门诊患者中的应用:意大利全科医生调查结果。
Acta Biomed. 2020 Mar 19;91(1):7-14. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i1.8275.
3
Assessing the Risk for Development of Deep Vein Thrombosis among Chinese Patients using the 2010 Caprini Risk Assessment Model: A Prospective Multicenter Study.
使用 2010 年 Caprini 风险评估模型评估中国患者发生深静脉血栓的风险:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2020 Aug 1;27(8):801-808. doi: 10.5551/jat.51359. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
4
Clinical impact of application of risk assessment models (Padua Prediction Score and Improve Bleeding Score) on venous thromboembolism, major hemorrhage and health expenditure associated with pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis: a "real life" prospective and retrospective observational study on patients hospitalized in a Single Internal Medicine Unit (the STIME study).风险评估模型(Padua 预测评分和改善出血评分)在静脉血栓栓塞症、大出血和与药物预防 VTE 相关的卫生支出方面的临床影响:一项在单个内科病房住院患者中进行的“真实生活”前瞻性和回顾性观察研究(STIME 研究)。
Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;13(4):527-534. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1808-z. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
5
Prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients after the results of recent trials with the new oral anticoagulants.基于近期新型口服抗凝剂试验结果的急性内科疾病患者静脉血栓栓塞的预防
Intern Emerg Med. 2013 Dec;8(8):667-72. doi: 10.1007/s11739-013-0979-x. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
6
Benefits versus risks of pharmacological prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in unselected medical patients revisited. Meta-analysis of the medical literature.重新审视非选择性内科患者药物预防有症状静脉血栓栓塞症的获益与风险。医学文献的荟萃分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2012 Jul;34(1):11-9. doi: 10.1007/s11239-012-0730-x.