Codsi Michael J, Bennetts Craig, Gordiev Katherine, Boeck Daniel M, Kwon Young, Brems John, Powell Kimerly, Iannotti Joseph P
Department of Orthopaedics, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 May-Jun;17(3):471-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.08.010. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
Current glenoid implants are designed to be secured to the articular surface. When the articular surface is compromised, a glenoid component could be implanted if it obtained fixation from the endosteal surface of the glenoid vault. The first step for designing such a glenoid implant is to define the normal three-dimensional anatomy of the glenoid vault. The purpose of this study was to define the variations in glenoid vault shape in a large group of cadaver scapula. Computed tomographic (CT) scans of 61 normal scapulae (mean, 25-34 years) from the Haman-Todd Osteological Collection, with a wide range of sizes, were examined to define the normal glenoid vault anatomy. A custom software program was used to manipulate and measure the scans to determine the morphologic variations among the different glenoid vaults. From these data, we defined a unique glenoid vault shape and empirically developed 5 sizes to represent the study population of the 61 scapulae. A second group of 11 cadaver scapulae were used to validate the shape defined using the other 61. Prototype implants were placed into the real 11 scapulae using standard surgical techniques and then CT-scanned to analyze the shape of the glenoid vault. In the 61 scapulae, 85% of the points defining the endosteal surfaces vary among scapulae by less than 2 mm. For each of the 11 cadaver scapulae, the implant size used in the virtual computer implantation was the same size used for the plastic components placed into the cadaver scapulae. Fifty percent of the measured distances between the outer dimensions of the plastic models was within 2.4 mm of the glenoid endosteal surface. Eighty percent of the surface area of the plastic models was within 3.1 mm of the glenoid endosteal surface. Five percent of the dimensions were less than 1 mm and were considered to be areas of point contact. Before designing implants that can be used in pathologic glenoids, the shape of the normal glenoid vault must first be defined. This study defined a normal glenoid vault shape that can accommodate different sized scapula with 5 sizes. This glenoid shape may be used as a template to design a glenoid implant that obtains fixation within the glenoid vault.
当前的关节盂植入物设计用于固定在关节表面。当关节表面受损时,如果关节盂组件能够从关节盂穹窿的骨内膜表面获得固定,就可以植入。设计这种关节盂植入物的第一步是确定关节盂穹窿的正常三维解剖结构。本研究的目的是确定一大组尸体肩胛骨中关节盂穹窿形状的变异情况。对来自哈曼 - 托德骨学收藏馆的61具正常肩胛骨(平均年龄25 - 34岁)进行计算机断层扫描(CT),这些肩胛骨大小各异,以确定正常关节盂穹窿的解剖结构。使用定制软件程序对扫描图像进行处理和测量,以确定不同关节盂穹窿之间的形态变异。根据这些数据,我们定义了一种独特的关节盂穹窿形状,并根据经验开发了5种尺寸来代表61具肩胛骨的研究群体。使用另外11具尸体肩胛骨来验证用其他61具所定义的形状。使用标准手术技术将原型植入物放入这11具真实的肩胛骨中,然后进行CT扫描以分析关节盂穹窿的形状。在61具肩胛骨中,定义骨内膜表面的点有85%在不同肩胛骨之间的差异小于2毫米。对于11具尸体肩胛骨中的每一具,虚拟计算机植入中使用的植入物尺寸与放入尸体肩胛骨中的塑料组件尺寸相同。塑料模型外部尺寸之间测量距离的50%在距关节盂骨内膜表面2.4毫米范围内。塑料模型表面积的80%在距关节盂骨内膜表面3.1毫米范围内。5%的尺寸小于1毫米,被认为是点接触区域。在设计可用于病理性关节盂的植入物之前,必须首先确定正常关节盂穹窿的形状。本研究定义了一种正常的关节盂穹窿形状,它可以通过5种尺寸适应不同大小的肩胛骨。这种关节盂形状可作为模板来设计一种能在关节盂穹窿内获得固定的关节盂植入物。