• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创脊柱手术的多重益处:经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与后路腰椎融合术的比较结果

The multiple benefits of minimally invasive spinal surgery: results comparing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar fusion.

作者信息

Starkweather Angela R, Witek-Janusek Linda, Nockels Russ P, Peterson Jonna, Mathews Herb L

机构信息

Intercollegiate College of Nursing, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosci Nurs. 2008 Feb;40(1):32-9.

PMID:18330408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3714401/
Abstract

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) offers equivalent postoperative fusion rates compared to posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) and minimizes the amount of iatrogenic injury to the spinal muscles. The objective of this study was to examine the difference in pain perception, stress, mood disturbance, quality of life, and immunological indices throughout the perioperative course among patients undergoing TLIF and PLF. A prospective, nonrandomized descriptive design was used to evaluate these measures among patients undergoing TLIF (n = 17) or PLF (n = 18) at 1 week prior to surgery (T1), the day of surgery (T2), 24 hours postoperatively (T3), and 6 weeks postoperatively (T4). Among TLIF patients, pain, stress, fatigue, and mood disturbance were significantly decreased at the 6-week followup visit (T4) compared to patients who underwent PLF. The TLIF group also demonstrated significantly higher levels (near baseline) of CD8 cells at T4 than the PLF group. Interleukin-6 levels were significantly higher in the TLIF group as well, which may be an indicator of ongoing nerve regeneration and healing. Knowledge concerning the effect of pain and the psychological experience on immunity among individuals undergoing spinal fusion can help nurses tailor interventions to improve outcomes, regardless of the approach used.

摘要

与后路腰椎融合术(PLF)相比,微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)术后融合率相当,且能将对脊柱肌肉的医源性损伤降至最低。本研究的目的是探讨接受TLIF和PLF的患者在围手术期疼痛感知、压力、情绪障碍、生活质量和免疫指标的差异。采用前瞻性、非随机描述性设计,在手术前1周(T1)、手术当天(T2)、术后24小时(T3)和术后6周(T4)对接受TLIF(n = 17)或PLF(n = 18)的患者进行这些指标的评估。与接受PLF的患者相比,TLIF患者在6周随访(T4)时疼痛、压力、疲劳和情绪障碍显著减轻。TLIF组在T4时的CD8细胞水平也显著高于PLF组(接近基线水平)。TLIF组的白细胞介素-6水平也显著更高,这可能是神经持续再生和愈合的一个指标。了解脊柱融合患者疼痛和心理体验对免疫的影响,有助于护士制定干预措施以改善预后,无论采用何种手术方式。

相似文献

1
The multiple benefits of minimally invasive spinal surgery: results comparing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar fusion.微创脊柱手术的多重益处:经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与后路腰椎融合术的比较结果
J Neurosci Nurs. 2008 Feb;40(1):32-9.
2
Posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.后路融合术(PLF)与经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(TLIF)治疗腰椎滑脱症的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Spine J. 2018 Jun;18(6):1088-1098. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.028. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
3
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of Blood Loss, Surgical Complications, and Hospital Course.微创与开放腰椎融合术:失血、手术并发症及住院过程的比较
Iowa Orthop J. 2015;35:130-4.
4
Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone.腰椎滑脱症的后外侧融合联合椎间融合术与单纯后外侧融合术相比,再次手术的发生率更低。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;138:117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.08.014. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
5
Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease.融合技术不会影响腰椎退行性疾病患者的短期报告结局。
Spine J. 2019 Dec;19(12):1960-1968. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.07.014. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
6
Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术中及围手术期并发症:513例患者的回顾性研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 May;22(5):487-95. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14129. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
7
A Novel Inextensible Endoscopic Tube Versus Traditional Extensible Retractor System in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Observation Study.新型不可伸缩内镜管与传统可伸缩牵开器系统在单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术中的应用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Pain Physician. 2019 Nov;22(6):E587-E599.
8
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗肥胖患者的临床疗效比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jun;20(6):644-52. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.SPINE13794. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
9
Perioperative complications related to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion: evaluation of 204 operations on lumbar instability at single center.与微创经椎间孔腰椎融合术相关的围手术期并发症:单中心204例腰椎不稳手术的评估
Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):2078-84. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.12.016. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
10
The cost-effectiveness of interbody fusions versus posterolateral fusions in 137 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.137例腰椎滑脱症患者行椎间融合术与后外侧融合术的成本效益分析
Spine J. 2015 Mar 1;15(3):492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.10.007. Epub 2014 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations of overweight/obesity with patient-reported outcome measures after oblique lumbar interbody fusion.斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术后超重/肥胖与患者报告结局指标的相关性
Front Surg. 2024 Jun 20;11:1360982. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1360982. eCollection 2024.
2
Awake Spinal Fusion Is Associated with Reduced Length of Stay, Opioid Use, and Time to Ambulation Compared to General Anesthesia: A Matched Cohort Study.与全身麻醉相比,清醒脊柱融合术与住院时间缩短、阿片类药物使用减少和下床活动时间提前相关:一项匹配队列研究。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Aug;176:e91-e100. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 May 8.
3
Factors contributing to the utilization of robotic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.导致机器人结直肠手术应用的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3306-3320. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09793-8. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
4
Clinical Effect of Minimally Invasive Microendoscopic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation.微创经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间融合术治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec;14(12):3300-3312. doi: 10.1111/os.13443. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
5
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective, controlled observational study of short-term outcome.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术:短期疗效的前瞻性对照观察研究。
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Oct;45(5):3417-3426. doi: 10.1007/s10143-022-01845-w. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
6
Postoperative Anemia Predicts Length of Stay for Geriatric Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery.术后贫血可预测接受微创腰椎融合手术的老年患者的住院时间。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2020 Mar 31;11:2151459320911874. doi: 10.1177/2151459320911874. eCollection 2020.
7
Outcomes of direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) in an Australian cohort.澳大利亚队列中直接外侧椎间融合术(DLIF)的治疗结果。
J Spine Surg. 2019 Mar;5(1):1-12. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.01.08.
8
Cost-utility analysis of posterior minimally invasive fusion compared with conventional open fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis.腰椎滑脱症后路微创融合术与传统开放融合术的成本效用分析
SAS J. 2011 Jun 1;5(2):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2011.02.001. eCollection 2011.
9
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis grades 1-2: patient-reported clinical outcomes and cost-utility analysis.1-2级退行性腰椎滑脱的微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术:患者报告的临床结果及成本效益分析
Ochsner J. 2014 Spring;14(1):32-7.
10
Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review.微创后路腰椎融合术的比较结果:系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1727-37. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3465-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Biologic markers and disc degeneration.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Apr;88 Suppl 2:72-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01326.
2
Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences.腰椎间盘疾病与腰痛:社会经济因素及后果
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Apr;88 Suppl 2:21-4. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01273.
3
Surgery-induced immunosuppression and postoperative pain management.
AACN Clin Issues. 2005 Jul-Sep;16(3):302-9; quiz 416-8. doi: 10.1097/00044067-200507000-00004.
4
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术:100例连续患者的临床、影像学结果及并发症
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Aug;18(4):337-46. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000166642.69189.45.
5
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF):技术可行性及初步结果
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Feb;18 Suppl:S1-6. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000132291.50455.d0.
6
Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation.多裂肌萎缩与躯干伸展肌力的比较:经皮与开放椎弓根螺钉固定
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jan 1;30(1):123-9.
7
Breast cancer patients have improved immune and neuroendocrine functions following massage therapy.乳腺癌患者在接受按摩治疗后,免疫功能和神经内分泌功能得到改善。
J Psychosom Res. 2004 Jul;57(1):45-52. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00500-2.
8
Cytokines and wound healing: the role of cytokine and anticytokine therapy in the repair response.细胞因子与伤口愈合:细胞因子及抗细胞因子疗法在修复反应中的作用
J Burn Care Rehabil. 2004 Mar-Apr;25(2):149-60. doi: 10.1097/01.bcr.0000111766.97335.34.
9
Postoperative epidural anesthesia preserves lymphocyte, but not monocyte, immune function after major spine surgery.脊柱大手术后,术后硬膜外麻醉可保留淋巴细胞免疫功能,但不能保留单核细胞免疫功能。
Anesth Analg. 2004 Apr;98(4):1086-1092. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000104586.12700.3A.
10
The effects of therapeutic back massage on psychophysiologic variables and immune function in spouses of patients with cancer.治疗性背部按摩对癌症患者配偶心理生理变量和免疫功能的影响。
Nurs Res. 2003 Sep-Oct;52(5):318-28. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200309000-00006.