Kelsen D, Hudis C, Niedzwiecki D, Dougherty J, Casper E, Botet J, Vinciguerra V, Rosenbluth R
Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Cornell University Medical College, New York, New York.
Cancer. 1991 Sep 1;68(5):965-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910901)68:5<965::aid-cncr2820680509>3.0.co;2-2.
Conventional chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas has had little effect on palliation or survival. Almost all studies of systemic therapy have involved empiric use of a variety of Phase II or conventional agents alone or in combination. On the basis of recent studies using a human tumor pancreatic cancer (PC) xenograft in nude mice, a Phase I clinical trial of cisplatin, high-dose cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C), and caffeine (CAC) was performed in patients with advanced incurable PC. A tolerable dose and schedule of the three agents were developed. Seven of 18 patients with measurable disease in this Phase I trial had partial responses to CAC. A Phase III comparison of CAC versus standard treatment using streptozotocin, mitomycin, and 5-fluorouracil (SMF) was performed. Eighty-two patients with advanced PC were entered into this random assignment trial. The two treatment arms were well balanced for the usual prognostic factors. Although the acute (e.g., nausea and vomiting) toxicities of CAC were greater than those of SMF, both groups of patients tolerated treatment resonably well. Ninety percent of patients were evaluable for response. Two patients (5.5%) on the CAC treatment arm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0% to 15%) and four patients (10.2%) on the SMF treatment arm (95% CI, 1% to 22%) had objective responses (partial response in measurable disease or improvement in evaluable disease). No complete remissions were observed. The 95% confidence limits of response for CAC and SMF overlapped. The median duration of survival for all patients on the SMF treatment arm was 10 months, although it was 5 months on the CAC treatment arm (P = 0.008). In this Phase III comparison, CAC was not superior to conventional therapy with SMF in terms of response and was inferior for survival. Neither regimen is effective treatment for advanced PC.
对于无法切除或转移性胰腺癌的传统化疗,在缓解症状或延长生存期方面效果甚微。几乎所有关于全身治疗的研究都涉及经验性地单独或联合使用各种II期药物或传统药物。基于最近在裸鼠中使用人胰腺肿瘤胰腺癌(PC)异种移植的研究,对晚期无法治愈的PC患者进行了顺铂、高剂量阿糖胞苷(Ara-C)和咖啡因(CAC)的I期临床试验。确定了这三种药物的可耐受剂量和给药方案。在这项I期试验中,18例可测量疾病的患者中有7例对CAC有部分反应。进行了CAC与使用链脲佐菌素、丝裂霉素和5-氟尿嘧啶(SMF)的标准治疗的III期比较。82例晚期PC患者进入了这项随机分配试验。两个治疗组在常见的预后因素方面平衡良好。尽管CAC的急性毒性(如恶心和呕吐)大于SMF,但两组患者对治疗的耐受性都还算可以。90%的患者可评估反应。CAC治疗组有2例患者(5.5%)(95%置信区间[CI],0%至15%),SMF治疗组有4例患者(10.2%)(95%CI,1%至22%)有客观反应(可测量疾病的部分反应或可评估疾病的改善)。未观察到完全缓解。CAC和SMF反应的95%置信区间重叠。SMF治疗组所有患者的中位生存期为10个月,而CAC治疗组为5个月(P = 0.008)。在这项III期比较中,CAC在反应方面并不优于SMF的传统治疗,在生存期方面则较差。两种方案都不是晚期PC的有效治疗方法。