• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人与儿童人群超声引导下中心静脉置管的比较。

Comparison of ultrasonography-guided central venous catheterization between adult and pediatric populations.

作者信息

Tercan Fahri, Oguzkurt Levent, Ozkan Ugur, Eker Hatice Evren

机构信息

Baskent Universitesi, Adana Arastirma ve Uygulama Merkezi, Radyoloji Bölümü, Dadaloglu Mah. 39 Sok No. 6, Yuregir, Adana 01250, Turkey.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008 May-Jun;31(3):575-80. doi: 10.1007/s00270-008-9315-7. Epub 2008 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00270-008-9315-7
PMID:18330631
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the technical success and complication rates of ultrasonography-guided central venous catheterization between adult and pediatric patients which have not been reported previously. In a 4-year period, 859 ultrasonography-guided central vein catheterizations in 688 adult patients and 247 catheterizations in 156 pediatric patients were retrospectively evaluated. Mean age was 56.3 years (range, 18 to 95 years) for adults and 3.3 years (range, 0.1 to 16.3 years) for children. The preferred catheterization site was internal jugular vein in 97% of adults and 85% of children. The technical success rate, mean number of punctures, and rate of single wall puncture were 99.4%, 1.04 (range, 1-3), and 83% for adults and 90.3%, 1.25 (range, 1-5), and 49% for children, respectively. All the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Complication rates were 2.3% and 2.4% for adults and children, respectively (p > 0.05). Major complications such as pneumothorax and hemothorax were not seen in any group. In conclusion, ultrasonography-guided central venous catheterization has a high technical success rate, lower puncture attempt rate, and higher single wall puncture rate in adults compared to children. Complication rates are comparable in the two groups.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较成人和儿童患者超声引导下中心静脉置管的技术成功率和并发症发生率,此前尚无相关报道。在4年的时间里,对688例成年患者的859次超声引导下中心静脉置管和156例儿科患者的247次置管进行了回顾性评估。成人的平均年龄为56.3岁(范围18至95岁),儿童为3.3岁(范围0.1至16.3岁)。97%的成人和85%的儿童首选的置管部位是颈内静脉。成人的技术成功率、平均穿刺次数和单壁穿刺率分别为99.4%、1.04(范围1 - 3)和83%,儿童分别为90.3%、1.25(范围1 - 5)和49%。所有差异均具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。成人和儿童的并发症发生率分别为2.3%和2.4%(p > 0.05)。两组均未出现气胸和血胸等严重并发症。总之,与儿童相比,超声引导下中心静脉置管在成人中具有较高的技术成功率、较低的穿刺尝试率和较高的单壁穿刺率。两组的并发症发生率相当。

相似文献

1
Comparison of ultrasonography-guided central venous catheterization between adult and pediatric populations.成人与儿童人群超声引导下中心静脉置管的比较。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008 May-Jun;31(3):575-80. doi: 10.1007/s00270-008-9315-7. Epub 2008 Mar 11.
2
US-guided placement of temporary internal jugular vein catheters: immediate technical success and complications in normal and high-risk patients.超声引导下临时颈内静脉导管置入术:正常及高危患者的即刻技术成功率与并发症情况
Eur J Radiol. 2005 Jul;55(1):125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.10.004. Epub 2004 Nov 18.
3
Effect of the bevel direction of puncture needle on success rate and complications during internal jugular vein catheterization.穿刺针斜面方向对内颈静脉置管成功率和并发症的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):491-4. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da48.
4
Complications in internal jugular vs subclavian ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization: a comparative randomized trial.超声引导下颈内静脉与锁骨下静脉置管术的并发症:一项比较随机试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jul;45(7):968-976. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05651-9. Epub 2019 May 29.
5
Real-time ultrasound guided placement of temporary internal jugular vein catheters: assessment of technical success and complication rates in nephrology practice.实时超声引导下临时颈内静脉置管术:肾内科实践中的技术成功率和并发症发生率评估。
Nephrology (Carlton). 2012 Sep;17(7):603-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2012.01637.x.
6
Comparative Analysis of Ultrasound Guided Central Venous Catheterization Compared to Blind Catheterization.超声引导下中心静脉置管与盲穿置管的对比分析
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2017 Sep 1;38(2):107-114. doi: 10.1515/prilozi-2017-0028.
7
[Ultrasound-guided puncture of the jugular vein using a posterior approach].[超声引导下经后路颈静脉穿刺]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2008 Dec;55(10):616-20. doi: 10.1016/s0034-9356(08)70673-x.
8
Ultrasound-guided vascular access in adults and children: beyond the internal jugular vein puncture.成人及儿童的超声引导下血管通路:超越颈内静脉穿刺
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2008;59(3):157-66.
9
Jugular versus subclavian totally implantable access ports: catheter position, complications and intrainterventional pain perception.颈静脉与锁骨下完全植入式输液港:导管位置、并发症和介入治疗中的疼痛感知。
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Sep;79(3):338-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.12.010. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
10
Evaluation of an ultrasound-guided technique for central venous access via the internal jugular vein in 493 patients.对493例患者采用超声引导技术经颈内静脉进行中心静脉置管的评估。
Support Care Cancer. 2003 Mar;11(3):148-55. doi: 10.1007/s00520-002-0399-3. Epub 2002 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Different axis approaches for ultrasound-guided centrally inserted central catheterization in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.儿童超声引导下中心静脉置管的不同进针路径:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2025 Feb 24;12:1481975. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1481975. eCollection 2025.
2
Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial.超声引导下经皮中心静脉置管在婴儿和幼儿中采用短轴平面外与长轴平面内联合入路与长轴平面内入路的随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 30;17(9):e0275453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275453. eCollection 2022.
3
Ultrasound guidance for Port-A-Cath insertion in children; a comparative study.儿童植入输液港的超声引导;一项对比研究。
Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2021 Sep;8(3):181-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpam.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
4
Ultrasonographic Assessment of Anatomic Relationship Between the Internal Jugular Vein and the Common Carotid Artery in Infants and Children After ETT or LMA Insertion: A Prospective Observational Study.气管插管或喉罩置入术后婴幼儿颈内静脉与颈总动脉解剖关系的超声评估:一项前瞻性观察研究
Front Pediatr. 2020 Oct 29;8:605762. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.605762. eCollection 2020.
5
Long-Term Follow-Up Examination of the Internal Jugular Vein After Vessel-Sparing Implantation of a Hickman Catheter or Port Catheter.希克曼导管或端口导管保留血管植入术后颈内静脉的长期随访检查
Front Pediatr. 2019 Mar 13;7:58. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00058. eCollection 2019.
6
The effects of the Trendelenburg position and the Valsalva manoeuvre on internal jugular vein diameter and placement in children.特伦德伦伯格体位和瓦尔萨尔瓦动作对儿童颈内静脉直径及位置的影响。
Singapore Med J. 2015 Aug;56(8):468-71. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2015020.
7
Ultrasound guided vascular access in pediatric cardiac critical care.小儿心脏重症监护中超声引导下的血管通路建立
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2014 Oct;26(4):199-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 May 4.
8
Comparison between radiation exposure levels using an image intensifier and a flat-panel detector-based system in image-guided central venous catheter placement in children weighing less than 10 kg.体重小于10公斤儿童在影像引导下进行中心静脉导管置入时,使用影像增强器和基于平板探测器的系统的辐射暴露水平比较。
Pediatr Radiol. 2015 Feb;45(2):235-40. doi: 10.1007/s00247-014-3119-5. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
9
The simultaneous application of positive-end expiratory pressure with the Trendelenburg position minimizes respiratory fluctuations in internal jugular vein size.仰卧位时同时应用呼气末正压通气可使颈内静脉内径的呼吸波动最小化。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 May;66(5):346-51. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2014.66.5.346. Epub 2014 May 26.
10
Guidewire malposition during central venous catheterization despite the use of ultrasound guidance.尽管使用了超声引导,但在中心静脉置管过程中导丝位置不当。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 May;64(5):469-71. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.5.469.