Suppr超能文献

在研究幸福感和心理困扰水平时使用SF-12和RAND-12的后果。

Consequences of using SF-12 and RAND-12 when examining levels of well-being and psychological distress.

作者信息

Lee Adeline, Browne Mark Oakley, Villanueva Elmer

机构信息

Department of Rural and Indigenous Health, Monash University, Moe, Vic., Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;42(4):315-23. doi: 10.1080/00048670701881579.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the consequences of using the Short-Forum Health Survey (SF-12) and the RAND-12 Health Status Inventory (RAND-12) for estimation of associations between its component scores and the levels of well-being and psychological distress.

METHODS

Data from a rural community mental health survey of 5641 participants were analysed. Physical and mental health component scores of the SF-12 and RAND-12 were compared between participants with different rating on the Satisfaction with Life Scale and the Kessler-10. Descriptive graphical methods were utilized to explore the relationship between SF-12 and RAND-12 components scores against well-being and psychological distress. Proportional odds model was utilized to estimate the quantitative relationship between component scores of the SF-12 and RAND-12 against categories of well-being and psychological distress.

RESULTS

Both SF-12 and RAND-12 component scores were generally positively associated with well-being and negatively associated with psychological distress. Median scores were similar despite scoring techniques used. However, distribution of scores differed whereby the RAND-12 yielded wider spread of scores in measures of well-being and psychological distressed when compared to the SF-12. A larger proportion of participants was classified as having moderate and severe disability under the RAND-12 compared to the SF-12.

CONCLUSION

It is recommended that users of the SF-12 and the RAND-12 are aware of the implications of utilizing either of the scoring techniques. Scoring techniques used should ideally be based on the theoretical basis of the study with consideration of the target population. Researchers may wish to use the SF-12 if distinct uncorrelated physical and mental constructs are required and for studies on clinical populations. In contrast, RAND-12 should be used if correlated physical and mental constructs are required and if the study is on community or general populations.

摘要

目的

探讨使用简短健康调查量表(SF - 12)和兰德12项健康状况量表(RAND - 12)来估计其分量表得分与幸福感及心理困扰水平之间关联的结果。

方法

对来自一项针对5641名参与者的农村社区心理健康调查的数据进行分析。比较了在生活满意度量表和凯斯勒10项心理困扰量表上有不同评分的参与者之间SF - 12和RAND - 12的生理和心理健康分量表得分。运用描述性图形方法来探究SF - 12和RAND - 12分量表得分与幸福感及心理困扰之间的关系。采用比例优势模型来估计SF - 12和RAND - 12分量表得分与幸福感及心理困扰类别之间的定量关系。

结果

SF - 12和RAND - 12的分量表得分总体上均与幸福感呈正相关,与心理困扰呈负相关。尽管使用的评分技术不同,但中位数得分相似。然而,得分分布有所不同,与SF - 12相比,RAND - 12在幸福感和心理困扰测量中得分分布更广泛。与SF - 12相比,在RAND - 12下被归类为有中度和重度残疾的参与者比例更大。

结论

建议SF - 12和RAND - 12的使用者了解使用这两种评分技术的影响。理想情况下,所使用的评分技术应基于研究的理论基础并考虑目标人群。如果需要明确不相关的生理和心理结构以及用于临床人群的研究,研究人员可能希望使用SF - 12。相反,如果需要相关的生理和心理结构并且研究针对社区或普通人群,则应使用RAND - 12。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验