• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钝性脾损伤:我们观察得够久了吗?

Blunt splenic injuries: have we watched long enough?

作者信息

Smith Jason, Armen Scott, Cook Charles H, Martin Larry C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2008 Mar;64(3):656-63; discussion 663-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181650fb4.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181650fb4
PMID:18332805
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injuries (BSIs) has been used with increasing frequency in adult patients. There are currently no definitive guidelines established for how long BSI patients should be monitored for failure of NOM after injury.

METHODS

This study was performed to ascertain the length of inpatient observation needed to capture most failures, and to identify factors associated with failure of NOM. We utilized the National Trauma Data Bank to determine time to failure after BSI.

RESULTS

During the 5-year study period, 23,532 patients were identified with BSI, of which 2,366 (10% overall) were taken directly to surgery (within 2 hours of arrival). Of 21,166 patients initially managed nonoperatively, 18,506 were successful (79% of all-comers). Patients with isolated BSI are currently monitored approximately 5 days as inpatients. Of patients failing NOM, 95% failed during the first 72 hours, and monitoring 2 additional days saw only 1.5% more failures. Factors influencing success of NOM included computed tomographic injury grade, severity of patient injury, and American College of Surgeons designation of trauma center. Importantly, patients who failed NOM did not seem to have detrimental outcomes when compared with patients with successful NOM. No statistically significant predictive variables could be identified that would help predict patients who would go on to fail NOM.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that at least 80% of BSI can be managed successfully with NOM, and that patients should be monitored as inpatients for failure after BSI for 3 to 5 days.

摘要

背景

钝性脾损伤(BSIs)的非手术治疗(NOM)在成年患者中的应用频率越来越高。目前尚无关于BSI患者受伤后应监测多长时间以确定非手术治疗失败的明确指南。

方法

本研究旨在确定捕获大多数治疗失败所需的住院观察时间,并确定与非手术治疗失败相关的因素。我们利用国家创伤数据库来确定BSI后治疗失败的时间。

结果

在为期5年的研究期间,共识别出23,532例BSI患者,其中2,366例(占总数的10%)直接接受手术治疗(到达后2小时内)。在最初接受非手术治疗的21,166例患者中,18,506例治疗成功(占所有患者的79%)。目前,单纯BSI患者住院观察约5天。在非手术治疗失败的患者中,95%在最初72小时内失败,再额外监测2天仅多发现1.5%的失败病例。影响非手术治疗成功的因素包括计算机断层扫描损伤分级、患者损伤严重程度以及美国外科医师学会指定的创伤中心。重要的是,与非手术治疗成功的患者相比,非手术治疗失败的患者似乎并未出现不良后果。未发现有统计学意义的预测变量可帮助预测哪些患者会出现非手术治疗失败。

结论

我们得出结论,至少80%的BSI可以通过非手术治疗成功处理,并且BSI患者受伤后应住院监测3至5天以确定治疗失败情况。

相似文献

1
Blunt splenic injuries: have we watched long enough?钝性脾损伤:我们观察得够久了吗?
J Trauma. 2008 Mar;64(3):656-63; discussion 663-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181650fb4.
2
Liver cirrhosis: an unfavorable factor for nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury.肝硬化:钝性脾损伤非手术治疗的不利因素。
J Trauma. 2003 Jun;54(6):1131-6; discussion 1136. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000066123.32997.BB.
3
Nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma in the elderly: does age play a role?老年人钝性脾外伤的非手术治疗:年龄起作用吗?
Am Surg. 2007 Jun;73(6):585-9; discussion 590.
4
Blunt assault is associated with failure of nonoperative management of the spleen independent of organ injury grade and despite lower overall injury severity.钝性攻击与脾脏非手术治疗失败相关,这与器官损伤分级无关,且尽管总体损伤严重程度较低。
J Trauma. 2009 Mar;66(3):630-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181991aed.
5
Nonoperative treatment of multiple intra-abdominal solid organ injury after blunt abdominal trauma.钝性腹部创伤后腹腔内多个实性器官损伤的非手术治疗
J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4):943-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3180342023.
6
Nonoperative treatment of blunt injury to solid abdominal organs: a prospective study.腹部实性脏器钝性损伤的非手术治疗:一项前瞻性研究。
Arch Surg. 2003 Aug;138(8):844-51. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.8.844.
7
Observation for nonoperative management of the spleen: how long is long enough?脾脏非手术治疗的观察:多长时间才算足够?
J Trauma. 2008 Dec;65(6):1354-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31818e8fde.
8
Management of the most severely injured spleen: a multicenter study of the Research Consortium of New England Centers for Trauma (ReCONECT).最严重损伤脾脏的管理:新英格兰创伤中心研究联盟(ReCONECT)的多中心研究
Arch Surg. 2010 May;145(5):456-60. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.58.
9
Failure of observation of blunt splenic injury in adults: variability in practice and adverse consequences.成人钝性脾损伤漏诊情况:实践中的变异性及不良后果
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Aug;201(2):179-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.03.037.
10
Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in adults: age over 55 years as a powerful indicator for failure.成人钝性脾损伤的非手术治疗:55岁以上是治疗失败的有力指标。
J Am Coll Surg. 1996 Aug;183(2):133-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Splenic lacerations: a retrospective analysis of management strategies and clinical outcomes.脾破裂:管理策略与临床结果的回顾性分析
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025 Jul;31(7):644-650. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2025.74616.
2
Are interventional radiology techniques ideal for nonpenetrating splenic injury management: Robust statistical analysis of the Trauma Quality Program database.介入放射学技术是否是处理非穿透性脾损伤的理想方法:创伤质量项目数据库的稳健统计分析
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0315544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315544. eCollection 2024.
3
Treatment of blunt splenic injury in children in China.
中国儿童钝性脾损伤的治疗
Front Surg. 2024 Dec 3;11:1502557. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1502557. eCollection 2024.
4
The Management of Splenic Injuries.脾损伤的处理
Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama). 2023 Aug 11;9(3):149-155. doi: 10.22575/interventionalradiology.2022-0003. eCollection 2024 Nov 1.
5
The predictive value of CTSI scoring system in non-operative management of patients with splenic blunt trauma: The experience of a level 1 trauma center.CTSI评分系统在脾钝性创伤患者非手术治疗中的预测价值:一级创伤中心的经验
Eur J Radiol Open. 2023 Sep 23;11:100525. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100525. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
[Treatment recommendation and care in traumatic rupture of the spleen].[脾外伤性破裂的治疗建议与护理]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Aug;94(8):682-687. doi: 10.1007/s00104-023-01873-2. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
7
Variation in the utilization of angioembolization for splenic injury in hospitals: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan.日本医院间脾损伤血管栓塞术使用情况的差异:一项全国性横断面研究
Acute Med Surg. 2023 Apr 12;10(1):e837. doi: 10.1002/ams2.837. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
8
Successful non-operative management of multiple intra-abdominal solid organ injury after blunt abdominal trauma: a case report.多发腹部实质脏器损伤的钝性腹部创伤后成功非手术治疗:1 例报告
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Oct 3;43:54. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.43.54.35671. eCollection 2022.
9
Abdominal pain is a main manifestation of delayed bleeding after splenic injury in patients receiving non-operative management.腹痛是脾损伤非手术治疗患者延迟性出血的主要表现。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 18;12(1):19871. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24399-9.
10
Follow-up strategies for patients with splenic trauma managed non-operatively: the 2022 World Society of Emergency Surgery consensus document.非手术治疗脾外伤患者的随访策略:2022 年世界急诊外科学会共识文件。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct 12;17(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00457-5.