• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国防医疗服务医务人员对医学培训申请服务的体验评估

An Evaluation of the Medical Training Application Service as experienced by Defence Medical Service Medical Officers.

作者信息

Owen J P

出版信息

J R Nav Med Serv. 2007;93(3):117-24.

PMID:18333572
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In 2007 Defence Medical Service (DMS) Medical Officers (MOs) applying to train within hospital based specialities were selected using the Medical Training Application Service (MTAS). Recognising the problems being reported about MTAS, the Defence Postgraduate Medical Deanery (DPMD) conducted an evaluation in order to assess whether DMS MOs had also experienced problems with the MTAS process.

METHODS

DMS MO applicants were sent an email questionnaire, requesting both graded (Likert scale) and narrative responses, to gauge their opinion about the application service. The questionnaire covered the technical aspects of the process, the support available and the ability to demonstrate appropriate knowledge and skills.

RESULTS

Only 42 responses (32%) were received. However, having considered areas of potential bias, the graded questionnaire results and thematic analysis of the narrative responses showed a clear consensus amongst the applicants in many areas. More than three quarters (78%) of DMS applicants criticised the opportunity to record their abilities and achievements, and 91% recorded that the questions were unable to differentiate between candidates. These views were mirrored in the narrative responses, with more than 130 statements covering five topic areas highlighting areas for improvement. Strong support was recorded for the work and advice provided by DPMD in support of the candidates.

CONCLUSIONS

DMS MOs presented very negative opinions of their experiences of MTAS, highlighting their perceptions that they were unable to record their particular skills and experiences and that the questions were unable to discriminate between specialties. Particular difficulties were reported in presenting non-NHS experiences and skills.

摘要

目标

2007年,国防医疗服务(DMS)的医务人员(MOs)通过医疗培训申请服务(MTAS)申请医院专科培训。鉴于有报告称MTAS存在问题,国防研究生医学教务处(DPMD)进行了一项评估,以确定DMS的医务人员在MTAS流程中是否也遇到了问题。

方法

向DMS的申请人发送了一份电子邮件调查问卷,要求他们给出分级(李克特量表)和叙述性回答,以了解他们对申请服务的看法。问卷涵盖了流程的技术方面、可获得的支持以及展示适当知识和技能的能力。

结果

仅收到42份回复(32%)。然而,在考虑了潜在偏差的领域后,分级问卷结果和叙述性回答的主题分析显示,申请人在许多领域达成了明显的共识。超过四分之三(78%)的DMS申请人批评了记录自身能力和成就的机会,91%的申请人表示这些问题无法区分候选人。这些观点在叙述性回答中也有体现,超过130条陈述涵盖五个主题领域,突出了需要改进的方面。受访者对DPMD为支持候选人所做的工作和提供的建议给予了大力支持。

结论

DMS的医务人员对他们在MTAS中的经历给出了非常负面的评价,强调他们认为自己无法记录自己的特殊技能和经历,而且这些问题无法区分不同专科。在陈述非国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的经历和技能方面,报告了特别的困难。

相似文献

1
An Evaluation of the Medical Training Application Service as experienced by Defence Medical Service Medical Officers.国防医疗服务医务人员对医学培训申请服务的体验评估
J R Nav Med Serv. 2007;93(3):117-24.
2
An evaluation of the medical training application service as experienced by defence medical service medical officers.对国防医疗服务医务人员所体验的医学培训申请服务的评估。
J R Army Med Corps. 2007 Sep;153(3):175-80. doi: 10.1136/jramc-153-03-09.
3
Audit of annual medical appraisal and revalidation activity across the UK Defence Medical Services 2013-2014.2013 - 2014年英国国防医疗服务年度医学评估与再认证活动审计
J R Army Med Corps. 2017 Feb;163(1):23-26. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2015-000556. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
4
Preparing applications for specialty and general practice training in the Defence Medical Services.准备国防医疗服务专业及全科培训的申请。
J R Nav Med Serv. 2014;100(3):344-7.
5
10 steps to success at the Defence Medical Postgraduate Deanery (DPMD) overseas fellowship board.在国防医学研究生学院(DPMD)海外奖学金委员会取得成功的十个步骤。
J R Nav Med Serv. 2013;99(3):154-5.
6
Is the British Army medical grading functional assessment tool effective?英国陆军医疗分级功能评估工具是否有效?
J R Army Med Corps. 2015 Dec;161 Suppl 1:i23-i25. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2015-000553.
7
Stress, lies and red tape: the views, success rates and stress levels of the MTAS cohort.压力、谎言与繁文缛节:MTAS队列人群的观点、成功率及压力水平
J R Soc Med. 2008 Jun;101(6):313-8. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2008.070449.
8
Does recruitment lead to retention? Rural Clinical School training experiences and subsequent intern choices.招募是否会带来留用?农村临床医学院的培训经历及后续实习选择。
Rural Remote Health. 2006 Jan-Mar;6(1):511. Epub 2006 Feb 3.
9
The value of a general practitioner completed pre-employment medical questionnaire in recruit selection.全科医生填写的入职前医学调查问卷在招聘选拔中的价值。
J R Army Med Corps. 1994 Feb;140(1):13-7. doi: 10.1136/jramc-140-01-03.
10
Selection into specialty training in public health: performance of the Medical Training Application Service shortlisting.公共卫生专业培训的选拔:医学培训申请服务入围情况
J Public Health (Oxf). 2007 Dec;29(4):331-7. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdm060. Epub 2007 Sep 19.