Swancutt D R, Luesley D M, Eastaugh J L, Wilson S
Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
BJOG. 2008 Apr;115(5):646-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01664.x.
Current guidelines recommend that less than 20% of treatments in colposcopy clinics should be under general anaesthetic. The objective of this study was to increase the evidence base for guidelines by establishing the proportion of women receiving general anaesthesia for treatment, determining the predictors of and reasons recorded for general anaesthetic use.
Retrospective analysis of routinely collected data.
NHS Trust in the West Midlands.
Colposcopy patients; January 2003 to March 2005.
Logistic regression of factors associated with general anaesthetic choice.
Proportion of women treated under general anaesthesia, factors associated with anaesthetic choice and reasons recorded for general anaesthetic use.
About 5.4% (204/3777) of new appointments for colposcopy received treatment under general anaesthetic. Of women requiring treatment, 20% (204/1003) received general anaesthetic. General anaesthetic was more likely to be used when the woman required loop excision (OR = 3.63, 95% CI 2.11-6.24) and less likely when directed biopsy was performed (OR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.01-0.80), when the patient appointment date was after introduction of new guidelines (OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.24-0.56) or when the assessment visit was with a nonconsultant status doctor rather than nurse or consultant (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.97). General anaesthetic use varied between colposcopists ranging from 0 to 16.5% of new patients seen. Woman's choice was the most commonly specified reason for the use of general anaesthetic.
The proportion of colposcopy patients treated under general anaesthetic is 20%, within guideline limits. Substantial variation in general anaesthetic rates between colposcopists was observed, and further investigation is required to discover the reason for this.
当前指南建议阴道镜检查诊所中接受全身麻醉治疗的比例应低于20%。本研究的目的是通过确定接受全身麻醉治疗的女性比例、全身麻醉使用的预测因素及记录的原因,为指南增加证据基础。
对常规收集的数据进行回顾性分析。
西米德兰兹郡的国民保健服务信托基金。
2003年1月至2005年3月期间的阴道镜检查患者。
对与全身麻醉选择相关的因素进行逻辑回归分析。
接受全身麻醉治疗的女性比例、与麻醉选择相关的因素以及记录的全身麻醉使用原因。
约5.4%(204/3777)的阴道镜检查新预约患者接受了全身麻醉治疗。在需要治疗的女性中,20%(204/1003)接受了全身麻醉。当女性需要环形切除时更可能使用全身麻醉(比值比=3.63,95%置信区间2.11-6.24),而进行直接活检时则不太可能使用(比值比=0.11,95%置信区间0.01-0.80),当患者预约日期在新指南出台之后(比值比=0.37,95%置信区间0.24-0.56),或者评估就诊时是由非顾问级医生而非护士或顾问进行时(比值比=0.70,95%置信区间0.50-0.97)。不同阴道镜检查医生之间全身麻醉的使用率有所不同,范围为新就诊患者的0%至16.5%。女性的选择是使用全身麻醉最常提及的原因。
接受全身麻醉治疗的阴道镜检查患者比例为20%,在指南规定范围内。观察到不同阴道镜检查医生之间全身麻醉率存在显著差异,需要进一步调查其原因。