Eger R R, Peipert J F
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women & Infants' Hospital, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
J Reprod Med. 1996 Sep;41(9):671-4.
To evaluate demographic characteristics as risk factors for noncompliance with colposcopy clinic follow-up.
A retrospective, case-control study was performed on patients evaluated in the Women & Infants' Hospital colposcopy clinic between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1993. Data extracted from chart review included demographic characteristics, insurance status, smoking status, cytologic and histologic grade treatment received, number of appointments kept and missed, number of attempts to contact the patient and degree of compliance with colposcopy follow-up. A scoring system was created to assess a patient's level of compliance by evaluating the number of appointments kept and missed.
After review of the first 80 patients, a noncompliance rate of 23% was determined based on our scoring system. A total of 86 noncompliant patients were then compared to 93 compliant patients. Women who were noncompliant with follow-up were more likely to be on Medicaid or to have no insurance when compared to compliant patients (odds ratio [OR] = 2.4, confidence interval [CI] .85, 6.7), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .07). Noncompliant patients were less likely to have high grade lesions than compliant patients (OR = .34; CI .13, .85; P = .01).
Patients with lower grade lesions may be more likely to be noncompliant with recommended follow-up than patients with high grade lesions. This association may be due to a reduced emphasis on follow-up and patient education in women with low grade lesions. Increased educational efforts should be made to attempt to reduce high rates of noncompliance in this group of women.
评估人口统计学特征作为阴道镜门诊随访不依从的风险因素。
对1992年1月1日至1993年12月31日期间在妇女与婴儿医院阴道镜门诊接受评估的患者进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究。从病历审查中提取的数据包括人口统计学特征、保险状况、吸烟状况、接受的细胞学和组织学分级治疗、预约就诊和未就诊的次数、联系患者的尝试次数以及阴道镜随访的依从程度。创建了一个评分系统,通过评估预约就诊和未就诊的次数来评估患者的依从水平。
在对前80名患者进行审查后,根据我们的评分系统确定不依从率为23%。然后将86名不依从患者与93名依从患者进行比较。与依从患者相比,不依从随访的女性更有可能参加医疗补助计划或没有保险(优势比[OR]=2.4,置信区间[CI].85,6.7),但这种差异未达到统计学意义(P=.07)。与依从患者相比,不依从患者发生高级别病变的可能性较小(OR=.34;CI.13,.85;P=.01)。
与高级别病变患者相比,低级别病变患者可能更有可能不依从推荐的随访。这种关联可能是由于对低级别病变女性的随访和患者教育不够重视。应加大教育力度,试图降低这组女性的高不依从率。