Suppr超能文献

我们是否应该摒弃阵发性心房颤动时停用口服抗凝药的常规做法?

Should we abandon the common practice of withholding oral anticoagulation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?

作者信息

Nieuwlaat Robby, Dinh Trang, Olsson S Bertil, Camm A John, Capucci Alessandro, Tieleman Robert G, Lip Gregory Y H, Crijns Harry J G M

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, Maastricht 6221AZ, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2008 Apr;29(7):915-22. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn101. Epub 2008 Mar 10.

Abstract

AIMS

To assess the relation between the atrial fibrillation (AF) subtype and thrombo-embolic events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The observational Euro Heart Survey on AF (2003-04) enrolled 1509 paroxysmal, 1109 persistent, and 1515 permanent AF patients, according to the 2001 American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and the European Society of Cardiology guidelines definitions. A 1 year follow-up was performed. Permanent AF patients had at baseline a worse stroke risk profile than paroxysmal and persistent AF patients. In paroxysmal AF, the risk for stroke, any thrombo-embolism, major bleeding and the combined endpoint of cardiovascular mortality, any thrombo-embolism, and major bleeding was comparable with persistent and permanent AF, in both univariable and multivariable analyses. Compared with AF patients without stroke, patients suffering from a stroke had a comparable frequency and duration of AF attacks, but tended to have a worse stroke risk profile at baseline. During 1 year following cardioversion, paroxysmal AF patients had a higher risk for stroke (P = 0.029) and any thrombo-embolism (P = 0.001) than persistent AF patients.

CONCLUSION

In the Euro Heart Survey, paroxysmal AF had a comparable risk for thrombo-embolic events as persistent and permanent AF. This observation strengthens the guideline recommendation not to consider the clinical AF subtype when deciding on anticoagulation.

摘要

目的

评估心房颤动(AF)亚型与血栓栓塞事件之间的关系。

方法与结果

根据2001年美国心脏病学会、美国心脏协会及欧洲心脏病学会的指南定义,欧洲心房颤动观察性调查(2003 - 2004年)纳入了1509例阵发性房颤、1109例持续性房颤和1515例永久性房颤患者。进行了为期1年的随访。永久性房颤患者在基线时的卒中风险状况比阵发性和持续性房颤患者更差。在阵发性房颤中,无论是单变量分析还是多变量分析,卒中、任何血栓栓塞、大出血以及心血管死亡、任何血栓栓塞和大出血的联合终点事件的风险与持续性和永久性房颤相当。与无卒中的房颤患者相比,发生卒中的患者房颤发作的频率和持续时间相当,但在基线时往往具有更差的卒中风险状况。在复律后的1年中,阵发性房颤患者发生卒中(P = 0.029)和任何血栓栓塞(P = 0.001)的风险高于持续性房颤患者。

结论

在欧洲心房颤动观察性调查中,阵发性房颤发生血栓栓塞事件的风险与持续性和永久性房颤相当。这一观察结果强化了指南中关于在决定抗凝治疗时不考虑临床房颤亚型的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验