Chemical reaction: the U.S. response to REACH.
作者信息
Black Harvey
出版信息
Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Mar;116(3):A124-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.116-a124.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Chemical reaction: the U.S. response to REACH.化学反应：美国对化学品注册、评估、授权和限制制度的回应。
Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Mar;116(3):A124-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.116-a124.
2
Toxicology. Europe whittles down plans for massive chemical testing program.
Science. 2003 Nov 7;302(5647):969. doi: 10.1126/science.302.5647.969b.
3
[Safe usage of chemicals in European Union countries].[欧盟国家化学品的安全使用]
Med Pr. 2010;61(3):333-40.
4
Public health. E.U. starts a chemical reaction.
Science. 2003 Apr 18;300(5618):405. doi: 10.1126/science.300.5618.405a.
5
Cradle-to-grave management.
Occup Health Saf. 2007 Jan;76(1):73-5.
6
Science and regulation. New science for chemicals policy.科学与监管。化学品政策的新科学。
Science. 2009 Nov 20;326(5956):1065-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1177537.
7
Reforming state-level chemicals management policies in the United States: status, challenges, and opportunities.美国国家级化学品管理政策改革：现状、挑战与机遇
New Solut. 2009;19(1):9-29. doi: 10.2190/NS.19.1.c.
8
EPA focuses on off-site consequences but overlap exists with process safety.美国环境保护局关注场外后果，但与过程安全存在重叠。
Occup Health Saf. 1994 Dec;63(12):20-5.
9
GHS adoption in the face of Daubert.面对多伯特标准时全球化学品统一分类和标签制度的采用情况
Occup Health Saf. 2014 May;83(5):47-9.
10
The implementation of REACH: initial perspectives from government, industry, and civil society.《化学品注册、评估、授权和限制法规》（REACH）的实施：来自政府、行业和民间社会的初步观点。
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2011 Jan-Mar;17(1):57-62. doi: 10.1179/107735211799031130.
引用本文的文献
1
Toward a new U.S. chemicals policy: rebuilding the foundation to advance new science, green chemistry, and environmental health.迈向新的美国化学品政策：重建基础以推动新科学、绿色化学和环境健康。
Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Aug;117(8):1202-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0800404. Epub 2009 Feb 9.
Zotero 插件