Currow David C, Ward Alicia M, Plummer John L, Bruera Eduardo, Abernethy Amy P
Department of Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Daw Park, Adelaide, South Australia.
Support Care Cancer. 2008 Nov;16(11):1255-63. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0424-2. Epub 2008 Mar 12.
Specialised palliative care services (SPCS) aim to address the needs of patients and caregivers confronting life-limiting illnesses but only half of the potential cohort are referred. Randomised controlled trials of SPCS provision can no longer be ethically justified so there is a need to develop new methods to evaluate the net impact of SPCS for the whole community, not just for those who access SPCS. The aim of this study was to assess whether perceived comfort in the last 2 weeks of life was associated with accessing SPCS.
This study utilised a whole-of-population random survey (n = 4,366) in South Australia. A total of 802 respondents had someone close to them die within the last 5 years due to a terminal illness, and they had the complete data. A subsequent question was asked whether SPCS had been accessed. Perceived comfort levels for those who had used SPCS were compared with those who did not by using stereotype logistic regression, weighted to a standardised population.
Higher levels of comfort of the deceased having been assessed 'very comfortable' was associated with the use of SPCS (p = 0.04; odds ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.08). For people who accessed SPCS, 13.3% were reported as 'very comfortable' compared with 8.0% without SPCS. Almost one half of respondents (48.4%) reported that the deceased was considered 'uncomfortable' or 'very uncomfortable', irrespective of SPCS access.
While this study provides further incremental evidence of benefit from access to SPCS, there is much that still needs to be done to improve care for the whole community at the end of life.
专业姑息治疗服务(SPCS)旨在满足面临生命有限疾病的患者及其护理人员的需求,但只有一半的潜在人群得到了转诊。提供SPCS的随机对照试验在伦理上已不再合理,因此有必要开发新的方法来评估SPCS对整个社区的净影响,而不仅仅是对那些获得SPCS的人。本研究的目的是评估在生命的最后两周所感受到的舒适感是否与获得SPCS有关。
本研究在南澳大利亚进行了一项全人群随机调查(n = 4366)。共有802名受访者在过去5年内有亲近的人因绝症去世,且他们拥有完整的数据。随后询问了他们是否获得过SPCS。通过使用定型逻辑回归,将使用SPCS者与未使用者的感知舒适水平进行比较,并加权至标准化人群。
被评估为“非常舒适”的死者的较高舒适水平与使用SPCS有关(p = 0.04;优势比,1.78;95%置信区间,1.02 - 3.08)。对于获得SPCS的人,报告为“非常舒适”的比例为13.3%,而未获得SPCS的人这一比例为8.0%。几乎一半的受访者(48.4%)报告称死者被认为“不舒服”或“非常不舒服”,无论是否获得SPCS。
虽然本研究进一步提供了获得SPCS有益的渐进性证据,但在改善临终时对整个社区的护理方面仍有许多工作要做。