Blaskewitz Nina, Merten Thomas, Kathmann Norbert
Humboldt University, Institute of Psychology, Germany.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Jul;23(4):379-91. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 11.
Symptom validity testing is a major topic in the field of neuropsychological research, but until now, few studies focus on effort testing in children. Three symptom validity tests (SVTs), the Medical Symptom Validity Test, the Test of Memory Malingering, and the Fifteen Item Test plus several standard neuropsychological tests were administered to 73 German-language school children from 6 to 11 years. Participants were either instructed to give full effort or to follow a malingering scenario. It could be demonstrated that, except for one child, all participants with a basic reading level of grade 2 were able to pass all administered SVTs according to established cutoffs for poor effort (i.e., earned a score higher than the cutoff). For the experimental malingerers, however, it was fairly difficult to act according to the scenario throughout the session. While they scored worse in the neuropsychological tests, all but one of them failed at least one SVT. The results support the use of SVTs in childhood age. More elaborate experimental designs and studies with bona-fide patients and suspected malingerers are needed in order to evaluate both the appropriateness of available effort tests and the capabilities of children to fake poor performance.
症状效度测试是神经心理学研究领域的一个主要课题,但到目前为止,很少有研究关注儿童的努力程度测试。对73名6至11岁说德语的在校儿童进行了三项症状效度测试(SVT)、医学症状效度测试、记忆伪装测试和十五项测试,以及几项标准的神经心理学测试。参与者要么被要求全力以赴,要么按照伪装情境进行测试。结果表明,除一名儿童外,所有二年级基本阅读水平的参与者都能够根据既定的低努力程度临界值通过所有进行的SVT测试(即得分高于临界值)。然而,对于实验性伪装者来说,在整个测试过程中按照情境行事相当困难。虽然他们在神经心理学测试中的得分较低,但除一人外,其他人至少有一项SVT测试未通过。研究结果支持在儿童时期使用SVT测试。为了评估现有努力程度测试的适用性以及儿童伪装成绩不佳的能力,需要更精心设计的实验以及针对真正患者和疑似伪装者的研究。