Wattal Suman, Dhariwal A C, Ralhan P K, Tripathi V C, Regu K, Kamal S, Lal Shiv
National Institute of Communicable Diseases, Delhi.
J Commun Dis. 2007 Jun;39(2):75-84.
Diagnosis of Lymphatic Filariasis by microscopic examination of thick blood films (TBF) collected between 8.30 pm to 12 midnight, though highly specific is operationally problematic. We evaluated the TropBio Og4C3 serum ELISA as a tool for detection of W. bancrofti microfilaria carriers using Dried Blood Spots (DBS). The study was carried out in two parts (i) to test the sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA test for detection of circulating filarial antigen (CFA) in microfilaria (Mf) carriers vis-à-vis the conventional thick blood film (TBF) microscopy and its persistence in different categories of individuals during the course of disease viz., Endemic normals (n=51), microfilaria (Mf) carriers (n=27), acute cases (n=27), chronic cases (n=50) and a control group of non-endemic normals (n=48) using sera samples and ii) to study the utility of finger prick Dried Blood Spots (DBS) collected on filter paper for detection of Mf carriers and its comparison with another antigen detection assay, the Immunochromatographic test (ICT). Considering the non-endemic normals and microfilaria carriers, the ELISA test was found to have 100% sensitivity and 94.12% specificity for detection of Mf carriers in sera samples. The CFA was absent in majority of the subjects tested under other categories with a positivity of 7.8% among endemic normals, 11.12% among acute cases, 7.84% among chronic cases and 6.25% among nonendemic normals. Comparison of finger prick DBS and sera samples by ELISA vis-à-vis the ICT, carried out on Mf carriers (n=91) and endemic normals (n=97), showed a positivity of 88 (96.7%) in DBS as against 86 (94.5%) in sera samples and 88 (96.7%) by ICT, amongst Mf carriers, with a statistically significant correlation in antigen units between sera and DBS samples (r = 0.959, p = 0.000) amongst the microfilaria carriers. Out of 97 endemic normals, 19 (19.6%) sera and 17 (17.5%) DBS samples tested positive by ELISA while as 12(12.4%) tested positive by ICT, again with a statistically significant correlation between the antigen units in sera and DBS samples (r = 0.942, p = 0.000). DBS prepared from 25 microl of blood were found to be as sensitive as 50 microl for antigen detection. Antigen positivity detected from DBS collected during day and night from known microfilaria carriers (n=27) showed a statistically insignificant difference (p = 0.125) and a significant correlation in antigen units (r = 0.820 and p = 0.013). In view of the comparable results of ELISA, ICT and TBF microscopy, it is concluded that the TropBio Og4C3 ELISA using finger prick DBS can be used as an alternate to TBF microscopy for detection of bancroftian Filariasis under the LFE programme.
通过显微镜检查晚上8点30分至午夜12点采集的厚血膜(TBF)来诊断淋巴丝虫病,尽管特异性很高,但在实际操作中存在问题。我们评估了TropBio Og4C3血清ELISA作为一种使用干血斑(DBS)检测班氏吴策线虫微丝蚴携带者的工具。该研究分两部分进行:(i)相对于传统的厚血膜(TBF)显微镜检查,测试ELISA检测微丝蚴(Mf)携带者循环丝虫抗原(CFA)的敏感性和特异性,以及在疾病过程中其在不同类别的个体中的持续性,即地方性正常人(n = 51)、微丝蚴(Mf)携带者(n = 27)、急性病例(n = 27)、慢性病例(n = 50)和非地方性正常人对照组(n = 48),使用血清样本;(ii)研究滤纸采集的手指刺血干血斑(DBS)用于检测Mf携带者的效用,并将其与另一种抗原检测方法免疫层析试验(ICT)进行比较。考虑到非地方性正常人和微丝蚴携带者,ELISA检测血清样本中Mf携带者的敏感性为100%,特异性为94.12%。在其他类别测试的大多数受试者中未检测到CFA,地方性正常人中的阳性率为7.8%,急性病例中为11.12%,慢性病例中为7.84%,非地方性正常人中为6.25%。对Mf携带者(n = 91)和地方性正常人(n = 97)进行ELISA检测手指刺血DBS和血清样本并与ICT进行比较,结果显示Mf携带者中,DBS的阳性率为88(96.7%),血清样本为86(94.5%),ICT为88(96.7%),微丝蚴携带者中血清和DBS样本的抗原单位具有统计学显著相关性(r = 0.959,p = 0.000)。在97名地方性正常人中,ELISA检测19份(19.6%)血清和17份(17.5%)DBS样本呈阳性,而ICT检测12份(12.4%)呈阳性,血清和DBS样本中的抗原单位再次具有统计学显著相关性(r = 0.942,p = 0.000)。发现由25微升血液制备的DBS与50微升血液制备的DBS在抗原检测方面一样敏感。从已知微丝蚴携带者(n = 27)白天和晚上采集的DBS中检测到的抗原阳性率显示差异无统计学意义(p = 0.125),抗原单位具有显著相关性(r = 0.820,p = 0.013)。鉴于ELISA、ICT和TBF显微镜检查的可比结果,得出结论:在淋巴丝虫病消除计划(LFE)下,使用手指刺血DBS的TropBio Og4C3 ELISA可作为TBF显微镜检查的替代方法用于检测班氏丝虫病。