Scott Sheryl A, Proescholdbell Scott
University of Minnesota School of Public Health, MN, USA.
Health Promot Pract. 2009 Jan;10(1):102-10. doi: 10.1177/1524839907307677. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
Health promotion professionals are increasingly encouraged to implement evidence-based programs in health departments, communities, and schools. Yet translating evidence-based research into practice is challenging, especially for complex initiatives that emphasize environmental strategies to create community change. The purpose of this article is to provide health promotion practitioners with a method to evaluate the community change process and document successful applications of environmental strategies. The community change chronicle method uses a five-step process: first, develop a logic model; second, select outcomes of interest; third, review programmatic data for these outcomes; fourth, collect and analyze relevant materials; and, fifth, disseminate stories. From 2001 to 2003, the authors validated the use of a youth empowerment model and developed eight community change chronicles that documented the creation of tobacco-free schools policies (n = 2), voluntary policies to reduce secondhand smoke in youth hangouts (n = 3), and policy and program changes in diverse communities (n = 3).
健康促进专业人员越来越多地被鼓励在卫生部门、社区和学校实施循证项目。然而,将循证研究转化为实践具有挑战性,特别是对于强调环境策略以实现社区变革的复杂举措而言。本文的目的是为健康促进从业者提供一种评估社区变革过程并记录环境策略成功应用的方法。社区变革纪事法采用五步流程:首先,制定逻辑模型;其次,选择感兴趣的结果;第三,审查这些结果的项目数据;第四,收集和分析相关材料;第五,传播故事。从2001年到2003年,作者验证了青年赋权模型的使用,并编写了八篇社区变革纪事,记录了无烟学校政策的制定(n = 2)、减少青少年聚集场所二手烟的自愿政策(n = 3)以及不同社区的政策和项目变化(n = 3)。