Kugelmass Aaron D, Sadanandan Saihari, Lakkis Nasser, Dibattiste Peter M, Robertson Debbie H, Demopoulos Laura A, Gibson C Michael, Weintraub William S, Murphy Sabina A, Cannon Christopher P
Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA.
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2006 Sep;5(3):167-72. doi: 10.1097/01.hpc.0000236218.07432.a6.
Patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) have been classified as a high-risk subset of patients who experience non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Recent studies suggest that an early invasive strategy is beneficial in moderate- and high-risk patients with non-ST elevation ACS. We hypothesized that an early invasive strategy is associated with improved outcomes in patients with non-ST elevation ACS with prior CABG.
In the Treat Angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 18 trial (TACTICS-TIMI 18), 2220 patients with non-ST segment elevation ACS were randomized to an early invasive or conservative (selectively invasive) strategy. All patients were treated with aspirin, heparin, and tirofiban. Four hundred eighty-four (22%) of these patients had undergone CABG before enrollment. We analyzed whether patients with previous CABG had different 6-month outcomes and whether an early invasive strategy was associated with an improvement in long-term outcomes. Prior CABG was associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes by 6 months, including a higher rate of readmission for ACS (17.4% vs 11.0%, P < 0.001) and a higher incidence of the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, or rehospitalization for ACS (22.3% vs 16.4%, P = 0.002). There was a trend toward a higher incidence of myocardial infarction (7.1% vs 5.3%, P = 0.051). An early invasive strategy was associated with a reduction in the composite of death or myocardial infarction (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-1.0; P = 0.089) and a significant reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction at 6 months (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.93; P=0.032).
Patients with non-ST segment elevation ACS who have had previous CABG are a high-risk subset. An early invasive strategy reduces risk of myocardial infarction in this high-risk group.
既往接受过冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者被归类为非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的高危亚组患者。近期研究表明,早期侵入性策略对中度和高危非ST段抬高型ACS患者有益。我们假设,早期侵入性策略与既往接受过CABG的非ST段抬高型ACS患者的预后改善相关。
在替罗非班治疗心绞痛并确定侵入性或保守性策略治疗成本-心肌梗死溶栓治疗18试验(TACTICS-TIMI 18)中,2220例非ST段抬高型ACS患者被随机分配至早期侵入性或保守(选择性侵入)策略组。所有患者均接受阿司匹林、肝素和替罗非班治疗。其中484例(22%)患者在入组前接受过CABG。我们分析了既往接受过CABG的患者6个月的预后是否不同,以及早期侵入性策略是否与长期预后改善相关。既往CABG与6个月时不良预后风险较高相关,包括ACS再入院率较高(17.4%对11.0%,P<0.001)以及死亡、心肌梗死或ACS再住院复合终点发生率较高(22.3%对16.4%,P = 0.002)。心肌梗死发生率有升高趋势(7.1%对5.3%,P = 0.051)。早期侵入性策略与死亡或心肌梗死复合终点降低相关(优势比[OR],0.58;95%置信区间[CI],0.31 - 1.0;P = 0.089),且6个月时心肌梗死发生率显著降低(OR,0.44;95%CI,0.21 - 0.93;P = 0.032)。
既往接受过CABG的非ST段抬高型ACS患者是高危亚组。早期侵入性策略可降低该高危组心肌梗死风险。