细胞外钆造影剂:稳定性差异

Extracellular gadolinium contrast agents: differences in stability.

作者信息

Morcos S K

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2008 May;66(2):175-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.025. Epub 2008 Mar 14.

Abstract

Extracellular gadolinium contrast agents (Gd-CA) are either linear or macrocyclic chelates available as ionic or non-ionic preparations. The molecular structure whether cyclic or linear and ionicity determines the stability of Gd-CA. Linear chelates are flexible open chains which do not offer a strong binding to Gd(3+). In contrast, the macrocyclic chelates offer a strong binding to Gd(3+) by the virtue of being preorganized rigid rings of almost optimal size to cage the gadolinium atom. Non-ionic preparations are also less stable in comparison to the ionic ones as the binding between Gd(3+) with the negatively charged carboxyl groups is stronger in comparison to that with amides or alcohol in the non-ionic preparations. According to stability constants and kinetic measurements, the most stable Gd-CM is the ionic-macrocyclic chelate Gd-DOTA and the least stable agents are the non-ionic linear chelates gadodiamide and gadoversetamide. In vivo data confirmed the low stability of non-ionic linear chelates but no significant difference was observed amongst the macrocyclic agents whether ionic (Gd-DOTA) or non-ionic such as Gd-HP-DO3A and Gd-BT-DO3A. The stability of Gd-CA seems to be an important factor in the pathogenesis of the serious complication of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Gd-CA of low stability are likely to undergo transmetallation and release free Gd ions that deposit in tissue and attract circulating fibrocytes to initiate the process of fibrosis. No cases of NSF have been observed so far after the exclusive use of the stable macrocyclic Gd-CA.

摘要

细胞外钆造影剂(Gd-CA)为线性或大环螯合物,有离子型和非离子型制剂。分子结构(无论是环状还是线性以及离子性)决定了Gd-CA的稳定性。线性螯合物是柔性开链,对Gd(3+)的结合力不强。相比之下,大环螯合物凭借其预先形成的几乎最佳尺寸的刚性环来包围钆原子,从而对Gd(3+)有很强的结合力。与离子型制剂相比,非离子型制剂的稳定性也较低,因为Gd(3+)与带负电荷的羧基之间的结合比与非离子型制剂中的酰胺或醇的结合更强。根据稳定性常数和动力学测量,最稳定的Gd-CM是离子型大环螯合物Gd-DOTA,最不稳定的制剂是非离子型线性螯合物钆双胺和钆布醇胺。体内数据证实了非离子型线性螯合物的低稳定性,但在大环制剂中未观察到显著差异,无论是离子型(Gd-DOTA)还是非离子型,如Gd-HP-DO3A和Gd-BT-DO3A。Gd-CA的稳定性似乎是导致肾源性系统性纤维化严重并发症发病机制中的一个重要因素。低稳定性的Gd-CA可能会发生金属离子转移并释放游离的Gd离子,这些离子沉积在组织中并吸引循环中的纤维细胞引发纤维化过程。到目前为止,在仅使用稳定的大环Gd-CA后尚未观察到NSF病例。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索