Grajek Stefan, Lesiak Maciej, Araszkiewicz Aleksander, Pyda Małgorzata, Skorupski Włodzimierz, Grygier Marek, Mitkowski Przemysław, Prech Marek, Baszko Artur, Janus Magdalena, Breborowicz Piotr, Rzeźniczak Janusz, Tarchalski Janusz, Główka Andrzej, Cieśliński Andrzej
1st Department of Cardiology, Pozan University of Medical Science, Poznan, Poland.
Kardiol Pol. 2008 Feb;66(2):154-63; discussion 164-5.
Although primary coronary angioplasty seems to be the best treatment in acute myocardial infarction (MI), thrombolytic therapy still remains the most common reperfusion strategy particularly in smaller centers. Nowadays, different regional networks are developed to improve the treatment of patients with MI.
To analyse the effects of different therapeutic strategies on 30-day and long-term mortality (median time 18.3 months) after ST-elevation MI (STEMI) in a population of 3 350 000 people from the Wielkopolska Region.
In 2002, 3780 patients with STEMI entered the registry. Complete data were available for 3564 (94.3%) patients. Depending on therapeutic strategies, patients were divided into five groups: the PCI group--direct percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) in small cathlab, 'selected patients', n=381 (10.7%); the PA group--aged <70, treated with tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) up to 4 hours from the onset of chest pain, n=479 (13.4%); the IS group - invasive strategy in every patient, 24-hour duty, setting of unselected patients with STEMI, n=989 (27.7%); the SK group--patients receiving standard streptokinase treatment up to 12 hours from the onset of chest pain, n=584 (16.4%); the NR group--no reperfusion therapy, n=1131 (31.7%).
The 30-day mortality rate in the groups above was: 3.15, 4.38, 4.54, 9.25, and 12.5% respectively (p <0.001). Long-term mortality rate was: 4.2, 9.4, 9.4, 14.4, and 18.50% respectively (p <0.001). The rate of urgent PCI in the PA group was 25% and in the SK group--11% (p <0.001).
Treatment with rt-PA in patients under 70 years of age and up to 4 hours from pain onset may be an alternative to an invasive strategy. However, a quarter of those patients require urgent PCI. In long-term observation the mortality benefit can be clearly seen only in patients with early PCI.
尽管直接冠状动脉血管成形术似乎是急性心肌梗死(MI)的最佳治疗方法,但溶栓治疗仍然是最常用的再灌注策略,尤其是在较小的医疗中心。如今,不同的区域网络已建立起来以改善MI患者的治疗。
分析不同治疗策略对大波兰地区335万人群中ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者30天及长期死亡率(中位时间18.3个月)的影响。
2002年,3780例STEMI患者进入登记系统。3564例(94.3%)患者有完整数据。根据治疗策略,患者被分为五组:PCI组——在小型导管室对“选定患者”进行直接经皮冠状动脉血管成形术(PCI),n = 381例(10.7%);PA组——年龄<70岁,胸痛发作4小时内接受组织纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)治疗,n = 479例(13.4%);IS组——对所有患者采用侵入性策略,24小时值班,针对未选定的STEMI患者,n = 989例(27.7%);SK组——胸痛发作12小时内接受标准链激酶治疗的患者,n = 584例(16.4%);NR组——未进行再灌注治疗,n = 1131例(31.7%)。
上述各组的30天死亡率分别为:3.15%、4.38%、4.54%、9.25%和12.5%(p<0.001)。长期死亡率分别为:4.2%、9.4%、9.4%、14.4%和18.50%(p<0.001)。PA组的紧急PCI率为25%,SK组为11%(p<0.001)。
70岁以下且胸痛发作4小时内的患者使用rt-PA治疗可能是侵入性策略的替代方法。然而,这些患者中有四分之一需要紧急PCI。在长期观察中,仅早期接受PCI的患者死亡率获益明显。