van Dijk Paul, Hogervorst Wouter, ter Riet Gerben, van Dijk Frank
Division of Clinical Methods and Public Health, Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Occup Med (Lond). 2008 Jun;58(4):257-62. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqn017. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
If general practitioners (GPs) were better informed about patients' risks of long-term sickness absence (LTSA), they could incorporate these risk assessments into their patient management plans and cooperate more with occupational physicians to prevent LTSA.
To evaluate the effectiveness of a protocol helping GPs in recording risks of LTSA and in co-operating with occupational physicians (OPs).
Twenty-six GPs (co-operating in four groups) in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, participated in a controlled intervention study. Fourteen GPs were the protocol-supported intervention group and twelve GPs were the reference group. Outcome measures were consultations containing work-related information, information about two risk factors for LTSA, referrals to OPs and contacts of OPs with GPs and patients. Outcomes were identified through an electronic search in the GPs' information systems. Entries containing information were independently scored by two investigators. The proportions of patients with consultations documenting LTSA-pertinent items were compared between the groups, accounting for differences at baseline.
There was no increase in consultations containing work-related information. Recording of risk factor information increased in the intervention group; the difference was 4.5% [95% CI 1.5-7.6] and 1.8% (95% CI -0.8 to 4.4) for the two risk factors. The referral rate to the OP increased by 2.9% (95% CI 1.2-4.5). There was no effect on contacts of OPs with GPs or with patients.
Protocol-supported consultations may lead to a modest increase in information regarding two risk factors for LTSA in GPs' electronic records and to more referrals to OPs.
如果全科医生(GP)能更好地了解患者长期病假(LTSA)的风险,他们就能将这些风险评估纳入患者管理计划,并与职业医生更多地合作以预防LTSA。
评估一项帮助全科医生记录LTSA风险并与职业医生(OP)合作的方案的有效性。
荷兰阿姆斯特丹的26名全科医生(分四组合作)参与了一项对照干预研究。14名全科医生为方案支持干预组,12名全科医生为参照组。结果指标包括包含工作相关信息的会诊、关于LTSA两个风险因素的信息、转介给职业医生以及职业医生与全科医生和患者的联系。通过在全科医生信息系统中进行电子搜索来确定结果。两名研究者对包含信息的条目进行独立评分。比较两组之间记录有LTSA相关项目会诊的患者比例,并考虑基线差异。
包含工作相关信息的会诊没有增加。干预组中风险因素信息的记录有所增加;两个风险因素的差异分别为4.5% [95%可信区间1.5 - 7.6]和1.8%(95%可信区间 - 0.8至4.4)。转介给职业医生的比例增加了2.9%(95%可信区间1.2 - 4.5)。对职业医生与全科医生或患者的联系没有影响。
方案支持的会诊可能会使全科医生电子记录中关于LTSA两个风险因素的信息略有增加,并导致更多患者被转介给职业医生。