Haddock Geoffrey, Maio Gregory R, Arnold Karin, Huskinson Thomas
School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jun;34(6):769-78. doi: 10.1177/0146167208314871. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
Three experiments tested the hypothesis that need for affect and need for cognition influence receptivity to affect- and cognition-based persuasive messages. Experiment 1 found that an affective message elicited more positive attitudes among individuals high in need for affect and low in need for cognition, whereas a cognitive message elicited more positive attitudes among individuals low in need for affect and high in need for cognition. Experiment 2 found that individual differences in need for affect influenced receptivity to an affect-based (but not cognition-based) message, whereas individual differences in need for cognition influenced receptivity to a cognition-based (but not affect-based) message. Experiment 3 found that individual differences in need for affect were associated with increased recognition of information from an affect-based (but not cognition-based) message, whereas individual differences in need for cognition were associated with increased recognition of information from a cognition-based (but not affect-based) message. Overall, the studies point to the importance of individual differences in need for affect and need for cognition in understanding how individuals respond to different types of persuasive messages.
三项实验对“情感需求和认知需求会影响对基于情感和基于认知的说服性信息的接受度”这一假设进行了检验。实验1发现,情感信息在情感需求高而认知需求低的个体中引发了更积极的态度,而认知信息在情感需求低而认知需求高的个体中引发了更积极的态度。实验2发现,情感需求的个体差异影响了对基于情感(而非基于认知)信息的接受度,而认知需求的个体差异影响了对基于认知(而非基于情感)信息的接受度。实验3发现,情感需求的个体差异与对基于情感(而非基于认知)信息的信息识别增加有关,而认知需求的个体差异与对基于认知(而非基于情感)信息的信息识别增加有关。总体而言,这些研究指出了情感需求和认知需求的个体差异在理解个体如何回应不同类型的说服性信息方面的重要性。