Suppr超能文献

双侧胫股内侧关节在完全伸直和膝关节屈曲20度时僵硬。

Bilateral medial tibiofemoral joint stiffness in full extension and 20 degrees of knee flexion.

作者信息

Aronson Patricia A, Rijke Arie M, Ingersoll Christopher D

机构信息

Lynchburg College, Lynchburg, VA 24501, USA.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 2008 Apr-Jun;43(2):157-63. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.157.

Abstract

CONTEXT

The valgus stress test is used clinically to assess injury to the medial knee structures in 2 positions: full extension and some degree of flexion. The amount of flexion used to "isolate" the medial collateral ligament is not consistent in the literature, but most studies have shown that stiffness of the ligaments was consistent between the limbs.

OBJECTIVE

To determine (1) if the stiffness of the medial knee structures was the same bilaterally, and (2) if the stiffness was different in full extension compared with 20 degrees of knee flexion.

DESIGN

Criterion standard, before-after design.

SETTING

University research laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Both knees of 45 healthy and active volunteers (26 females, 19 males; age = 23.2 +/- 3.96 years, height = 170.6 +/- 7.75 cm, mass = 74.2 +/- 15.14 kg) were studied.

INTERVENTION(S): A valgus force of 60 N was applied to the lateral aspect of both knees in full extension and in 20 degrees of flexion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The slope of the force-strain line of the medial knee during a valgus force was calculated using the LigMaster arthrometer.

RESULTS

Slope means in full extension were 16.1 +/- 3.3 (right knee) and 15.8 +/- 3.1(left knee). Means for 20 degrees of flexion were 12.2 +/- 3.1 (right) and 11.7 +/- 2.8 (left). Stiffness was greater when the knee was in full extension versus 20 degrees of flexion (t(44) = 12.04, P < .001). No difference was noted between the slopes of the 2 knees in extension (t(44) = 0.74, P = .46) or in flexion (t(44) = 1.2, P = .27).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the use of the contralateral knee as a control. Further, the valgus stress test should be performed in full extension and in some degree of flexion to assess the different restraining structures of the medial tibiofemoral joint.

摘要

背景

外翻应力试验在临床上用于评估膝关节内侧结构在两个位置的损伤情况:完全伸直位和一定程度的屈曲位。文献中用于“分离”内侧副韧带的屈曲角度并不一致,但大多数研究表明,两侧韧带的刚度是一致的。

目的

确定(1)膝关节内侧结构的刚度两侧是否相同,以及(2)与膝关节屈曲20度相比,完全伸直位时刚度是否不同。

设计

标准对照、前后设计。

地点

大学研究实验室。

患者或其他参与者

对45名健康且活跃的志愿者(26名女性,19名男性;年龄 = 23.2±3.96岁,身高 = 170.6±7.75厘米,体重 = 74.2±15.14千克)的双膝进行研究。

干预措施

在完全伸直位和屈曲20度时,对双膝外侧施加60牛的外翻力。

主要观察指标

使用LigMaster关节测量仪计算外翻力作用下膝关节内侧的力 - 应变线斜率。

结果

完全伸直位时,右侧膝关节斜率均值为16.1±3.3,左侧膝关节为15.8±3.1。屈曲20度时,右侧均值为12.2±3.1,左侧为11.7±2.8。膝关节完全伸直时的刚度大于屈曲20度时(t(44) = 12.04,P <.001)。伸直位时两侧膝关节斜率无差异(t(44) = 0.74,P =.46),屈曲位时也无差异(t(44) = 1.2,P =.27)。

结论

这些发现支持将对侧膝关节作为对照。此外,应在完全伸直位和一定程度的屈曲位进行外翻应力试验,以评估胫股内侧关节不同的限制结构。

相似文献

2
Tibiofemoral joint positioning for the valgus stress test.髌股关节定位用于外翻应力试验。
J Athl Train. 2010 Jul-Aug;45(4):357-63. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-45.4.357.
8
Collateral ligament laxity in knees: what is normal?膝关节侧副韧带松弛:正常情况是怎样的?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Nov;472(11):3426-31. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3865-6. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

本文引用的文献

6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验