• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过动脉张力测量法估算的心内膜下存活比率:对主动脉僵硬度增加的老年高血压患者的关键评估

Subendocardial viability ratio estimated by arterial tonometry: a critical evaluation in elderly hypertensive patients with increased aortic stiffness.

作者信息

Chemla Denis, Nitenberg Alain, Teboul Jean-Louis, Richard Christian, Monnet Xavier, le Clesiau Hervé, Valensi Paul, Brahimi Mabrouk

机构信息

Paris-Sud University, Research Team EA4046, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.

出版信息

Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2008 Aug;35(8):909-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2008.04927.x. Epub 2008 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1681.2008.04927.x
PMID:18346166
Abstract
  1. Increased aortic stiffness predisposes to myocardial ischaemia by increasing the systolic tension-time index and by decreasing aortic pressure throughout diastole. The tonometric subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR) is a non-invasive estimate of myocardial perfusion relative to cardiac workload. The hypothesis that SEVR is impaired in elderly hypertensives with high aortic pulse pressure (PP) was tested in the present study. 2. The SEVR was calculated by radial applanation tonometry in 203 subjects. In addition, diastolic time (DT), systolic time (ST) and mean diastolic and systolic aortic pressures (Pd and Ps, respectively) were calculated. First, 60 subjects matched for age and gender were analysed (20 controls, 20 hypertensives with pulse pressure (PP) < or = 60 mmHg, 20 hypertensives with PP > 60 mmHg; mean (+/-SD) age 64 +/- 9 years; 24 women, 36 men). The remaining 143 subjects, aged 53 +/- 10 years, were analysed subsequently. 3. The SEVR was similar in the three elderly groups (1.39 +/- 0.34, 1.39 +/- 0.28 and 1.35 +/- 0.25, in controls and hypertensive patients with PP < or = 60 and > 60 mmHg, respectively). The SEVR was positively related to DT/ST (r(2) = 0.89) and to DT (r(2) = 0.73) and was negatively related to heart rate (r(2) = 0.56; P < 0.001 each). However, SEVR was not related to ST, PP, mean Pd or mean Ps. At a given DT/ST, SEVR tended to be lower in hypertensives with PP > 60 mmHg than in hypertensives with normal PP. The positive linear relationship between SEVR and DT/ST was confirmed in the remaining 143 subjects (r(2) = 0.90), with no influence of aortic pressure. 4. The tonometric SEVR was not impaired in elderly hypertensive patients with increased aortic stiffness. In resting elderly and middle-aged individuals, the tonometric SEVR was mainly related to DT/ST ratio, not to aortic pressure.
摘要
  1. 主动脉僵硬度增加会通过提高收缩期张力 - 时间指数以及降低整个舒张期的主动脉压力,从而易引发心肌缺血。眼压式心内膜下存活比率(SEVR)是对心肌灌注相对于心脏工作量的一种无创评估。本研究检验了这样一个假设:在具有高主动脉脉压(PP)的老年高血压患者中,SEVR会受损。2. 通过桡动脉压平式眼压测量法对203名受试者计算SEVR。此外,还计算了舒张期时间(DT)、收缩期时间(ST)以及平均舒张期和收缩期主动脉压力(分别为Pd和Ps)。首先,对60名年龄和性别匹配的受试者进行分析(20名对照组,20名脉压(PP)≤60 mmHg的高血压患者,20名PP>60 mmHg的高血压患者;平均(±标准差)年龄64±9岁;女性24名,男性36名)。随后对其余143名年龄为53±10岁的受试者进行分析。3. 三组老年人群的SEVR相似(对照组以及PP≤60 mmHg和>60 mmHg的高血压患者中,分别为1.39±0.34、1.39±0.28和1.35±0.25)。SEVR与DT/ST呈正相关(r² = 0.89),与DT呈正相关(r² = 0.73),与心率呈负相关(r² = 0.56;P均<0.001)。然而,SEVR与ST、PP、平均Pd或平均Ps无关。在给定的DT/ST时,PP>60 mmHg的高血压患者的SEVR往往低于PP正常者。在其余143名受试者中也证实了SEVR与DT/ST之间的正线性关系(r² = 0.90),且不受主动脉压力影响。4. 在主动脉僵硬度增加的老年高血压患者中,眼压式SEVR并未受损。在静息状态的老年人和中年人中,眼压式SEVR主要与DT/ST比值有关,而非与主动脉压力有关。

相似文献

1
Subendocardial viability ratio estimated by arterial tonometry: a critical evaluation in elderly hypertensive patients with increased aortic stiffness.通过动脉张力测量法估算的心内膜下存活比率:对主动脉僵硬度增加的老年高血压患者的关键评估
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2008 Aug;35(8):909-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2008.04927.x. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
2
Subendocardial viability index is related to the diastolic/systolic time ratio and left ventricular filling pressure, not to aortic pressure: an invasive study in resting humans.心内膜下心肌存活指数与舒张/收缩时间比值及左心室充盈压有关,而与主动脉压力无关:一项针对静息状态下人体的有创研究。
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2009 Apr;36(4):413-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2008.05084.x. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
3
Determinants of isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly.老年人单纯收缩期高血压的决定因素。
J Hypertens Suppl. 1992 Aug;10(6):S73-7.
4
Subendocardial viability ratio as an index of impaired coronary flow reserve in hypertensives without significant coronary artery stenoses.心内膜下存活比值作为高血压患者无明显冠状动脉狭窄时冠状动脉血流储备受损的指标。
J Hum Hypertens. 2012 Jan;26(1):64-70. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2010.127. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
5
Mean aortic pressure is the geometric mean of systolic and diastolic aortic pressure in resting humans.平均主动脉压是静息状态下人体收缩期和舒张期主动脉压的几何平均值。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Dec;99(6):2278-84. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00713.2005. Epub 2005 Jul 28.
6
Arterial stiffness, central blood pressures, and wave reflections in cardiomyopathy-implications for risk stratification.心肌病中的动脉僵硬度、中心血压和波反射——对风险分层的意义
J Card Fail. 2007 Jun;13(5):353-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2007.02.008.
7
The study of aortic stiffness in different hypertension subtypes in dialysis patients.透析患者不同高血压亚型的主动脉僵硬度研究。
Hypertens Res. 2008 Apr;31(4):593-9. doi: 10.1291/hypres.31.593.
8
Towards new indices of arterial stiffness using systolic pulse contour analysis: a theoretical point of view.从理论角度探讨基于收缩期脉搏轮廓分析的动脉僵硬度新指标
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2008 Feb;51(2):111-7. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e318163a977.
9
[Comparison of central pulse pressure estimated from pulse wave propagation velocity and carotid pulse pressure measured by applantation tonometry].基于脉搏波传播速度估算的中心脉压与应用压平式眼压计测量的颈动脉脉压的比较
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2002 Jul-Aug;95(7-8):637-40.
10
Aortic stiffness and distensibility among hypertensives.高血压患者的主动脉僵硬度和扩张性
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Sep;1173 Suppl 1:E68-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04958.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Lower estimates of myocardial perfusion are associated with greater aortic perivascular adipose tissue density in humans independent of aortic stiffness.与主动脉僵硬度无关,较低的心肌灌注估计值与人类主动脉周围脂肪组织密度的增加有关。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2024 Oct 1;327(4):H927-H934. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00436.2024. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
2
Resonance sonomanometry for noninvasive, continuous monitoring of blood pressure.用于无创、连续监测血压的共振测压法。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jul 30;3(7):pgae252. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae252. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Research Progress and Clinical Value of Subendocardial Viability Ratio.
心内膜下存活心肌比的研究进展及临床价值。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Mar 19;13(6):e032614. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032614. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
4
Subendocardial Viability Ratio Predictive Value for Cardiovascular Risk in Hypertensive Patients.心肌下存活比对高血压患者心血管风险的预测价值。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 22;59(1):24. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010024.
5
Acute Effects of Dietary Nitrate on Central Pressure and Endothelial Function in Hypertensive Patients: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study.膳食硝酸盐对高血压患者中心压和内皮功能的急性影响:一项随机、安慰剂对照交叉研究。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Jan 9;120(1):e20220209. doi: 10.36660/abc.20220209. eCollection 2023.
6
Exercise in Water Provides Better Cardiac Energy Efficiency Than on Land.水中运动比陆上运动能提供更好的心脏能量效率。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 13;8:747841. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.747841. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparison Between Invasive and Noninvasive Methods to Estimate Subendocardial Oxygen Supply and Demand Imbalance.比较评估心内膜下氧供和需失衡的有创和无创方法。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Sep 7;10(17):e021207. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021207. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
8
Arterial stiffness and subendocardial viability ratio in patients with peripheral arterial disease.外周动脉疾病患者的动脉僵硬度和心内膜下存活比值。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Mar;20(3):478-484. doi: 10.1111/jch.13213. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
9
Effect of CPAP on arterial stiffness in severely obese patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.持续气道正压通气对重度肥胖阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者动脉僵硬度的影响。
Sleep Breath. 2015 Dec;19(4):1155-65. doi: 10.1007/s11325-015-1131-0. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
10
Eight weeks of stretching training reduces aortic wave reflection magnitude and blood pressure in obese postmenopausal women.为期八周的伸展训练可降低肥胖绝经后女性的主动脉波反射幅度和血压。
J Hum Hypertens. 2014 Apr;28(4):246-50. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2013.98. Epub 2013 Oct 17.