• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Close correspondence between quantitative- and molecular-genetic divergence times for Neandertals and modern humans.尼安德特人与现代人类在定量遗传学和分子遗传学分歧时间上的密切对应关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 25;105(12):4645-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709079105. Epub 2008 Mar 17.
2
Were neandertal and modern human cranial differences produced by natural selection or genetic drift?尼安德特人与现代人类的颅骨差异是由自然选择还是基因漂变产生的?
J Hum Evol. 2007 Aug;53(2):135-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.03.001. Epub 2007 May 23.
3
Unconstrained cranial evolution in Neandertals and modern humans compared to common chimpanzees.与普通黑猩猩相比,尼安德特人和现代人类颅骨的无限制进化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Oct 22;282(1817):20151519. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1519.
4
Do modern humans and Neandertals have different patterns of cranial integration?现代人种和尼安德特人是否具有不同的颅骨整合模式?
J Hum Evol. 2011 Jun;60(6):684-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.04.010. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
5
Hominoid intraspecific cranial variation mirrors neutral genetic diversity.人科种内颅骨变异反映中性遗传多样性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 6;115(45):11501-11506. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802651115. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
6
Brief communication: paleoanthropology and the population genetics of ancient genes.简短通讯:古人类学与古代基因的群体遗传学
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001 Mar;114(3):269-72. doi: 10.1002/1096-8644(200103)114:3<269::AID-AJPA1025>3.0.CO;2-R.
7
Unique ramus anatomy for Neandertals?尼安德特人独特的支骨解剖结构?
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005 Oct;128(2):245-51. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.10432.
8
An evolutionary medicine perspective on Neandertal extinction.从进化医学角度看尼安德特人的灭绝。
J Hum Evol. 2017 Jul;108:62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 May 16.
9
Targeted retrieval and analysis of five Neandertal mtDNA genomes.对五个尼安德特人线粒体DNA基因组进行靶向检索与分析。
Science. 2009 Jul 17;325(5938):318-21. doi: 10.1126/science.1174462.
10
[Progresses on Neandertal genomics].[尼安德特人基因组学研究进展]
Yi Chuan. 2012 Jun;34(6):659-65. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1005.2012.00659.

引用本文的文献

1
Human population dynamics in Upper Paleolithic Europe inferred from fossil dental phenotypes.从更新世晚期欧洲古人类牙齿表型推断的人类种群动态。
Sci Adv. 2024 Aug 16;10(33):eadn8129. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn8129.
2
Rules of teeth development align microevolution with macroevolution in extant and extinct primates.牙齿发育规律使现存和已灭绝灵长类动物的微观进化与宏观进化保持一致。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2023 Oct;7(10):1729-1739. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02167-w. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
3
A weakly structured stem for human origins in Africa.人类起源于非洲的弱结构主干。
Nature. 2023 May;617(7962):755-763. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06055-y. Epub 2023 May 17.
4
No Country for Oldowan Men: Emerging Factors in Language Evolution.奥杜威峡谷人无立足之地:语言进化中的新出现因素
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 19;10:1448. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01448. eCollection 2019.
5
Dental evolutionary rates and its implications for the Neanderthal-modern human divergence.牙齿演化速率及其对尼安德特人与现代人分歧的意义。
Sci Adv. 2019 May 15;5(5):eaaw1268. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw1268. eCollection 2019 May.
6
Human bony labyrinth is an indicator of population history and dispersal from Africa.人类骨性迷路是人口历史和从非洲扩散的指标。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 17;115(16):4128-4133. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1717873115. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
7
Island Rule, quantitative genetics and brain-body size evolution in .岛屿法则、数量遗传学与……中的脑体大小进化
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Jun 28;284(1857). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1065.
8
Brain enlargement and dental reduction were not linked in hominin evolution.在人类进化过程中,脑部增大与牙齿缩小并无关联。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 17;114(3):468-473. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608798114. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
9
The origin and evolution of Homo sapiens.智人的起源与进化。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Jul 5;371(1698). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0237.
10
Unconstrained cranial evolution in Neandertals and modern humans compared to common chimpanzees.与普通黑猩猩相比,尼安德特人和现代人类颅骨的无限制进化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Oct 22;282(1817):20151519. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1519.

本文引用的文献

1
RATE TESTS FOR SELECTION ON QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS DURING MACROEVOLUTION AND MICROEVOLUTION.宏观进化和微观进化过程中定量性状选择的速率测试
Evolution. 1988 Sep;42(5):1085-1089. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb02526.x.
2
PHYLOGENETIC HYPOTHESES UNDER THE ASSUMPTION OF NEUTRAL QUANTITATIVE-GENETIC VARIATION.基于中性数量遗传变异假设的系统发育假说
Evolution. 1989 Jan;43(1):1-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04203.x.
3
QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY.多变量进化的定量遗传分析,应用于脑体大小异速生长
Evolution. 1979 Mar;33(1Part2):402-416. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04694.x.
4
STATISTICAL TESTS FOR NATURAL SELECTION ON QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS.对数量性状自然选择的统计检验
Evolution. 1977 Jun;31(2):442-444. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1977.tb01025.x.
5
NATURAL SELECTION AND RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT IN PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION.表型进化中的自然选择与随机遗传漂变
Evolution. 1976 Jun;30(2):314-334. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1976.tb00911.x.
6
PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION BY NEUTRAL MUTATION.中性突变导致的表型进化
Evolution. 1986 Sep;40(5):915-935. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00561.x.
7
The effect of ancient population bottlenecks on human phenotypic variation.古代人口瓶颈对人类表型变异的影响。
Nature. 2007 Jul 19;448(7151):346-8. doi: 10.1038/nature05951.
8
Were neandertal and modern human cranial differences produced by natural selection or genetic drift?尼安德特人与现代人类的颅骨差异是由自然选择还是基因漂变产生的?
J Hum Evol. 2007 Aug;53(2):135-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.03.001. Epub 2007 May 23.
9
Sequencing and analysis of Neanderthal genomic DNA.尼安德特人基因组DNA的测序与分析。
Science. 2006 Nov 17;314(5802):1113-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1131412.
10
Analysis of one million base pairs of Neanderthal DNA.对一百万个碱基对的尼安德特人DNA进行分析。
Nature. 2006 Nov 16;444(7117):330-6. doi: 10.1038/nature05336.

尼安德特人与现代人类在定量遗传学和分子遗传学分歧时间上的密切对应关系。

Close correspondence between quantitative- and molecular-genetic divergence times for Neandertals and modern humans.

作者信息

Weaver Timothy D, Roseman Charles C, Stringer Chris B

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 25;105(12):4645-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709079105. Epub 2008 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.0709079105
PMID:18347337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2290803/
Abstract

Recent research has shown that genetic drift may have produced many cranial differences between Neandertals and modern humans. If this is the case, then it should be possible to estimate population genetic parameters from Neandertal and modern human cranial measurements in a manner analogous to how estimates are made from DNA sequences. Building on previous work in evolutionary quantitative genetics and on microsatellites, we present a divergence time estimator for neutrally evolving morphological measurements. We then apply this estimator to 37 standard cranial measurements collected on 2,524 modern humans from 30 globally distributed populations and 20 Neandertal specimens. We calculate that the lineages leading to Neandertals and modern humans split approximately 311,000 (95% C.I.: 182,000 to 466,000) or 435,000 (95% C.I.: 308,000 to 592,000) years ago, depending on assumptions about changes in within-population variation. These dates are quite similar to those recently derived from ancient Neandertal and extant human DNA sequences. Close correspondence between cranial and DNA-sequence results implies that both datasets largely, although not necessarily exclusively, reflect neutral divergence, causing them to track population history or phylogeny rather than the action of diversifying natural selection. The cranial dataset covers only aspects of cranial anatomy that can be readily quantified with standard osteometric tools, so future research will be needed to determine whether these results are representative. Nonetheless, for the measurements we consider here, we find no conflict between molecules and morphology.

摘要

近期研究表明,基因漂变可能导致了尼安德特人与现代人类在颅骨方面的诸多差异。倘若如此,那么就应当能够以类似于从DNA序列进行估计的方式,从尼安德特人和现代人类的颅骨测量数据中估算群体遗传参数。基于进化数量遗传学和微卫星方面的先前研究,我们提出了一种用于中性进化形态测量的分歧时间估计方法。接着,我们将此估计方法应用于从全球30个分布群体的2524名现代人类以及20个尼安德特人标本上收集到的37项标准颅骨测量数据。我们计算得出,导致尼安德特人和现代人类的谱系大约在311,000(95%置信区间:182,000至466,000)或435,000(95%置信区间:308,000至592,000)年前分化,这取决于关于群体内部变异变化的假设。这些日期与最近从古代尼安德特人和现存人类DNA序列得出的日期颇为相似。颅骨和DNA序列结果之间的密切对应意味着,这两个数据集在很大程度上(尽管不一定完全)反映了中性分歧,使得它们能够追踪群体历史或系统发育,而非多样化自然选择的作用。颅骨数据集仅涵盖了能够用标准骨测量工具轻松量化的颅骨解剖学方面,因此未来还需要开展研究以确定这些结果是否具有代表性。尽管如此,对于我们在此所考虑的测量数据,我们并未发现分子与形态之间存在冲突。