Suppr超能文献

尼安德特人与现代人类在定量遗传学和分子遗传学分歧时间上的密切对应关系。

Close correspondence between quantitative- and molecular-genetic divergence times for Neandertals and modern humans.

作者信息

Weaver Timothy D, Roseman Charles C, Stringer Chris B

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 25;105(12):4645-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709079105. Epub 2008 Mar 17.

Abstract

Recent research has shown that genetic drift may have produced many cranial differences between Neandertals and modern humans. If this is the case, then it should be possible to estimate population genetic parameters from Neandertal and modern human cranial measurements in a manner analogous to how estimates are made from DNA sequences. Building on previous work in evolutionary quantitative genetics and on microsatellites, we present a divergence time estimator for neutrally evolving morphological measurements. We then apply this estimator to 37 standard cranial measurements collected on 2,524 modern humans from 30 globally distributed populations and 20 Neandertal specimens. We calculate that the lineages leading to Neandertals and modern humans split approximately 311,000 (95% C.I.: 182,000 to 466,000) or 435,000 (95% C.I.: 308,000 to 592,000) years ago, depending on assumptions about changes in within-population variation. These dates are quite similar to those recently derived from ancient Neandertal and extant human DNA sequences. Close correspondence between cranial and DNA-sequence results implies that both datasets largely, although not necessarily exclusively, reflect neutral divergence, causing them to track population history or phylogeny rather than the action of diversifying natural selection. The cranial dataset covers only aspects of cranial anatomy that can be readily quantified with standard osteometric tools, so future research will be needed to determine whether these results are representative. Nonetheless, for the measurements we consider here, we find no conflict between molecules and morphology.

摘要

近期研究表明,基因漂变可能导致了尼安德特人与现代人类在颅骨方面的诸多差异。倘若如此,那么就应当能够以类似于从DNA序列进行估计的方式,从尼安德特人和现代人类的颅骨测量数据中估算群体遗传参数。基于进化数量遗传学和微卫星方面的先前研究,我们提出了一种用于中性进化形态测量的分歧时间估计方法。接着,我们将此估计方法应用于从全球30个分布群体的2524名现代人类以及20个尼安德特人标本上收集到的37项标准颅骨测量数据。我们计算得出,导致尼安德特人和现代人类的谱系大约在311,000(95%置信区间:182,000至466,000)或435,000(95%置信区间:308,000至592,000)年前分化,这取决于关于群体内部变异变化的假设。这些日期与最近从古代尼安德特人和现存人类DNA序列得出的日期颇为相似。颅骨和DNA序列结果之间的密切对应意味着,这两个数据集在很大程度上(尽管不一定完全)反映了中性分歧,使得它们能够追踪群体历史或系统发育,而非多样化自然选择的作用。颅骨数据集仅涵盖了能够用标准骨测量工具轻松量化的颅骨解剖学方面,因此未来还需要开展研究以确定这些结果是否具有代表性。尽管如此,对于我们在此所考虑的测量数据,我们并未发现分子与形态之间存在冲突。

相似文献

5
Hominoid intraspecific cranial variation mirrors neutral genetic diversity.人科种内颅骨变异反映中性遗传多样性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 6;115(45):11501-11506. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802651115. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
6
Brief communication: paleoanthropology and the population genetics of ancient genes.简短通讯:古人类学与古代基因的群体遗传学
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001 Mar;114(3):269-72. doi: 10.1002/1096-8644(200103)114:3<269::AID-AJPA1025>3.0.CO;2-R.
7
Unique ramus anatomy for Neandertals?尼安德特人独特的支骨解剖结构?
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005 Oct;128(2):245-51. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.10432.
8
An evolutionary medicine perspective on Neandertal extinction.从进化医学角度看尼安德特人的灭绝。
J Hum Evol. 2017 Jul;108:62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 May 16.
10
[Progresses on Neandertal genomics].[尼安德特人基因组学研究进展]
Yi Chuan. 2012 Jun;34(6):659-65. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1005.2012.00659.

引用本文的文献

3
A weakly structured stem for human origins in Africa.人类起源于非洲的弱结构主干。
Nature. 2023 May;617(7962):755-763. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06055-y. Epub 2023 May 17.
6
Human bony labyrinth is an indicator of population history and dispersal from Africa.人类骨性迷路是人口历史和从非洲扩散的指标。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 17;115(16):4128-4133. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1717873115. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
8
Brain enlargement and dental reduction were not linked in hominin evolution.在人类进化过程中,脑部增大与牙齿缩小并无关联。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 17;114(3):468-473. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608798114. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
9
The origin and evolution of Homo sapiens.智人的起源与进化。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Jul 5;371(1698). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0237.

本文引用的文献

4
STATISTICAL TESTS FOR NATURAL SELECTION ON QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS.对数量性状自然选择的统计检验
Evolution. 1977 Jun;31(2):442-444. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1977.tb01025.x.
6
PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION BY NEUTRAL MUTATION.中性突变导致的表型进化
Evolution. 1986 Sep;40(5):915-935. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00561.x.
9
Sequencing and analysis of Neanderthal genomic DNA.尼安德特人基因组DNA的测序与分析。
Science. 2006 Nov 17;314(5802):1113-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1131412.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验