Sakata Koh-ichi, Sakurai Hideyuki, Suzuki Yoshiyuki, Katoh Shingo, Ohno Tatsuya, Toita Takafumi, Kataoka Masaaki, Tanaka Eiichi, Kaneyasu Yuuko, Uno Takashi, Harima Yoko, Nakano Takashi
Department of Radiology, Sapporo Medical University, School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Acta Oncol. 2008;47(3):434-41. doi: 10.1080/02841860701666048.
The purpose of this study was to clarify outcome for concurrent chemoradiation (CT-RT) in locally advanced cervix cancer in Japan. This is a non-randomized retrospective analysis of 226 patients treated with definitive CT-RT or radiotherapy alone (RT alone) in nine institutions between 2001 and 2003. External irradiation consisted of whole pelvic irradiation and pelvic side wall boost irradiation, using a central shield during the latter half of the treatment with the anteroposterior parallel opposing technique. The external beam irradiation was performed with 1.8 or 2 Gy per fraction. High-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR) was performed in all cases. In chemotherapy, platinum based drugs were used alone or in combination with other drugs such as 5FU. Grade of late complications was scaled retrospectively with CTCv2.0. Overall survival rate at 50 months of stage Ib, II and III, IV was 82% and 66% in CR-RT and 81% and 43% in R alone, respectively. Disease-free survival rate at 50 months of stage Ib, II and III, IV was 74% and 59% in CR-RT and 76% and 52% in R alone, respectively. There was no significant difference between CT-RT and RT for overall survival and disease free survival. Univariate analysis suggested that loco-regional control was better with CT-RT, but multivariate analysis could not confirm this finding. Compared to RT alone, CT-RT caused significantly more acute and late complications. Thus, late complication (grade 3-4) free survival rate at 50 month was 69% for CT-RT and 86% for RT alone (p<0.01). The therapeutic window with concomitant radiochemotherapy and HDR brachytherapy may be narrow, necessitating a close control of dose volume parameters and adherence to systems for dose prescription.
本研究的目的是阐明日本局部晚期宫颈癌同步放化疗(CT-RT)的治疗结果。这是一项对2001年至2003年间在9家机构接受根治性CT-RT或单纯放疗(单纯RT)的226例患者进行的非随机回顾性分析。体外照射包括全盆腔照射和盆腔侧壁增强照射,在后半程治疗中使用中央屏蔽,采用前后平行对置技术。体外照射每次分割剂量为1.8或2 Gy。所有病例均进行了高剂量率腔内近距离放疗(HDR)。化疗中,铂类药物单独使用或与其他药物如5FU联合使用。晚期并发症的分级采用CTCv2.0进行回顾性评估。Ib期、II期、III期和IV期患者在50个月时的总生存率,CT-RT组分别为82%和66%,单纯RT组分别为81%和43%。Ib期、II期、III期和IV期患者在50个月时的无病生存率,CT-RT组分别为74%和59%,单纯RT组分别为76%和52%。CT-RT与单纯RT在总生存率和无病生存率方面无显著差异。单因素分析表明CT-RT的局部区域控制更好,但多因素分析未能证实这一发现。与单纯RT相比,CT-RT引起的急性和晚期并发症明显更多。因此,CT-RT组在50个月时的晚期并发症(3-4级)无病生存率为69%,单纯RT组为86%(p<0.01)。同步放化疗和HDR近距离放疗的治疗窗口可能较窄,需要密切控制剂量体积参数并严格遵守剂量处方系统。