Hides Julie A, Stanton Warren R, McMahon Shaun, Sims Kevin, Richardson Carolyn A
Division of Physiotherapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Mar;38(3):101-8. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2658. Epub 2007 Dec 7.
A single-blinded, pretreatment-posttreatment assessment.
To investigate, using ultrasound imaging, the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the lumbar multifidus muscle at 4 vertebral levels (L2, L3, L4, L5) in elite cricketers with and without low back pain (LBP) and (2) to document the effect of a staged stabilization training program on multifidus muscle CSA.
Despite high fitness levels and often intensive strength training programs, athletes still suffer LBP. The incidence of LBP among Australian cricketers is 8% and as high as 14% among fast bowlers. Previous researchers have found that the multifidus muscle contributes to segmental stability of the lumbopelvic region; however, the CSA of this muscle has not been previously assessed in elite cricketers.
CSAs of the multifidus muscles were assessed at rest on the left and right sides for 4 vertebral levels at the start and completion of a 13-week cricket training camp. Participants who reported current or previous LBP were placed in a rehabilitation group. The stabilization program involved voluntary contraction of the multifidus, transversus abdominis, and pelvic floor muscles, with real-time feedback from rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI), progressed from non-weight-bearing to weight-bearing positions and movement training. Pain scores (using a visual analogue scale) were also collected from those with LBP.
The CSAs of the multifidus muscles at the L5 vertebral level increased for the 7 cricketers with LBP who received the stabilization training, compared with the 14 cricketers without LBP who did not receive rehabilitation (P = .004). In addition, the amount of muscle asymmetry among those with LBP significantly decreased (P = .029) and became comparable to cricketers without LBP. These effects were not evident for the L2, L3, and L4 vertebral levels. There was also a 50% decrease in the mean reported pain level among the cricketers with LBP.
Multifidus muscle atrophy can exist in highly active, elite athletes with LBP. Specific retraining resulted in an improvement in multifidus muscle CSA and this was concomitant with a decrease in pain.
Therapy, level 2b.
单盲、治疗前-治疗后评估。
(1)运用超声成像技术,研究有和无下背痛(LBP)的精英板球运动员在4个椎体水平(L2、L3、L4、L5)的腰多裂肌横截面积(CSA);(2)记录分阶段稳定训练计划对多裂肌CSA的影响。
尽管运动员体能水平高且经常进行高强度力量训练,但仍会遭受下背痛。澳大利亚板球运动员中下背痛的发生率为8%,快速投球手中高达14%。此前研究人员发现,多裂肌有助于腰骶部区域的节段稳定性;然而,此前尚未对精英板球运动员的该肌肉CSA进行评估。
在为期13周的板球训练营开始和结束时,对4个椎体水平左右两侧的多裂肌CSA进行静息评估。报告有当前或既往下背痛的参与者被纳入康复组。稳定训练计划包括多裂肌、腹横肌和盆底肌的自主收缩,并通过康复超声成像(RUSI)进行实时反馈,训练从非负重姿势进展到负重姿势和运动训练。还从有下背痛的参与者中收集疼痛评分(使用视觉模拟量表)。
与14名未接受康复治疗的无下背痛板球运动员相比,7名接受稳定训练的有下背痛板球运动员在L5椎体水平的多裂肌CSA增加(P = 0.004)。此外,有下背痛者的肌肉不对称程度显著降低(P = 0.029),并与无下背痛的板球运动员相当。这些效应在L2、L3和L4椎体水平不明显。有下背痛的板球运动员报告的平均疼痛水平也降低了50%。
有下背痛的高活跃度精英运动员可能存在多裂肌萎缩。特定的再训练可改善多裂肌CSA,且这与疼痛减轻同时出现。
治疗,2b级。