Suppr超能文献

糖尿病患者皮下胰岛素持续输注与多次每日胰岛素注射的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin injections in patients with diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Jeitler K, Horvath K, Berghold A, Gratzer T W, Neeser K, Pieber T R, Siebenhofer A

机构信息

Diabetes and Metabolism Outpatient Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036 Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Diabetologia. 2008 Jun;51(6):941-51. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-0974-3. Epub 2008 Mar 20.

Abstract

AIMS

We compared the effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with those of multiple daily insulin (MDI) injections on glycaemic control, risk of hypoglycaemic episodes, insulin requirements and adverse events in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were systematically searched for randomised controlled trials up to March 2007. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 22 studies were included (17 on type 1 diabetes mellitus, two on type 2 diabetes mellitus, three on children). With regard to adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus, our meta-analysis found a between-treatment difference of -0.4% HbA(1c) (six studies) in favour of CSII therapy. Available median rates of mild or overall hypoglycaemic events were comparable between the different interventions (1.9 [0.9-3.1] [CSII] vs 1.7 [1.1-3.3] [MDI] events per patient per week). Total daily insulin requirements were lower with CSII than with MDI therapy. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, CSII and MDI treatment showed no statistically significant difference for HbA(1c). The incidence of mild hypoglycaemic events was comparable between the treatment groups. In adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus, glycated haemoglobin and insulin requirements were significantly lower in the CSII groups; no data were available on hypoglycaemic events. The only study performed in younger children did not provide enough data for conclusive inferences. No overall conclusions were possible for severe hypoglycaemia and adverse events for any of the different patient groups due to rareness of such events, different definitions and insufficient reporting.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: CSII therapy in adults and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus resulted in a greater reduction of glycated haemoglobin, in adult patients without a higher rate of hypoglycaemia. No beneficial effect of CSII therapy could be detected for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

摘要

目的

我们比较了持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)与多次皮下胰岛素注射(MDI)对1型和2型糖尿病患者血糖控制、低血糖发作风险、胰岛素需求量及不良事件的影响。

方法

系统检索电子数据库MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL中截至2007年3月的随机对照试验。进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

结果

共纳入22项研究(17项针对1型糖尿病,2项针对2型糖尿病,3项针对儿童)。对于成年1型糖尿病患者,我们的荟萃分析发现CSII治疗组的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)较MDI治疗组降低了0.4%(6项研究)。不同干预措施之间轻度或总体低血糖事件的可用中位数发生率相当(CSII组为每周每位患者1.9[0.9 - 3.1]次,MDI组为每周每位患者1.7[1.1 - 3.3]次)。CSII治疗组的每日胰岛素总需求量低于MDI治疗组。对于2型糖尿病患者,CSII和MDI治疗在HbA1c方面无统计学显著差异。治疗组之间轻度低血糖事件的发生率相当。在1型糖尿病青少年患者中,CSII组的糖化血红蛋白和胰岛素需求量显著更低;未获得低血糖事件的数据。在年幼儿童中进行的唯一一项研究未提供足够数据以得出确定性推论。由于此类事件罕见、定义不同且报告不足,无法对任何不同患者组的严重低血糖和不良事件得出总体结论。

结论/解读:对于成年和青少年1型糖尿病患者,CSII治疗可使糖化血红蛋白有更大程度降低,且成年患者低血糖发生率未升高。未检测到CSII治疗对2型糖尿病患者有有益效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验