Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Sep;17(5):1337-1363. doi: 10.1177/19322968231186626. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
The use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy in pregnancies affected by pregestational diabetes mellitus (DM) has generated mixed outcome data worthy of further investigation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate clinical outcomes associated with CSII versus multiple daily injections (MDIs) in pregnant persons with pregestational DM.
A predefined, systematic, librarian-assisted search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (published from 2010 to 2022) yielded 3003 studies describing pregnancy outcomes associated with CSII and/or MDI for pregestational DM. The primary exposure was mode of insulin administration, with cesarean delivery and neonatal hypoglycemia as the primary maternal and neonatal outcomes, respectively. Secondary outcomes included hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, first and third-trimester glycemic control, large-for-gestational age (LGA) neonate, preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, need for respiratory support, hyperbilirubinemia, 5-minute Apgar <7, shoulder dystocia, and perinatal mortality. We calculated pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects models.
Among 39 eligible studies, 39% of the 5518 pregnancies included were exposed to CSII. Odds of cesarean delivery were higher with CSII (20 studies: 63% vs 56%, odds ratio [OR] 1.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-1.5]), but we did not identify a difference in the odds of neonatal hypoglycemia (23 studies: 31% vs 34%, OR 1.1 [95% CI 0.9-1.5]). Among secondary outcomes, only the odds of LGA (20 studies: 47% vs 38%, OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.2-1.6]) were higher in individuals using CSII versus MDI.
Use of CSII (vs MDI) for pregestational DM in pregnancy is associated with higher odds of cesarean delivery and delivery of an LGA neonate. Further evaluation of how CSII use may influence neonatal size and delivery route is warranted.
在患有孕前糖尿病的妊娠中使用持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)治疗产生了值得进一步研究的混合结果数据。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估 CSII 与多次皮下注射(MDI)在患有孕前糖尿病的孕妇中的临床结局。
通过预定义的、系统的、由图书馆员协助的 MEDLINE(PubMed)、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Scopus、ClinicalTrials.gov 和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(从 2010 年到 2022 年发布)的搜索共产生了 3003 项描述 CSII 和/或 MDI 与孕前糖尿病相关的妊娠结局的研究。主要暴露是胰岛素给药方式,剖宫产分娩和新生儿低血糖分别是主要的母婴结局。次要结局包括妊娠高血压疾病、第一和第三孕期血糖控制、巨大儿、早产、新生儿重症监护病房入院、需要呼吸支持、高胆红素血症、5 分钟 Apgar<7、肩难产和围产儿死亡率。我们使用随机效应模型计算了汇总优势比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。
在 39 项符合条件的研究中,5518 例妊娠中有 39%暴露于 CSII。CSII 组剖宫产分娩的几率更高(20 项研究:63%比 56%,优势比[OR]1.3[95%CI 1.2-1.5]),但我们没有发现 CSII 组新生儿低血糖的几率有差异(23 项研究:31%比 34%,OR 1.1[95%CI 0.9-1.5])。在次要结局中,只有 CSII 组(20 项研究:47%比 38%,OR 1.4[95%CI 1.2-1.6])巨大儿的几率更高。
在患有孕前糖尿病的妊娠中使用 CSII(与 MDI 相比)与剖宫产分娩和分娩巨大儿的几率增加相关。需要进一步评估 CSII 的使用如何影响新生儿的大小和分娩方式。