• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用戈尔TAG装置进行血管内治疗与胸主动脉瘤开放修复的五年结果比较。

Five-year results of endovascular treatment with the Gore TAG device compared with open repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms.

作者信息

Makaroun Michel S, Dillavou Ellen D, Wheatley Grayson H, Cambria Richard P

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2008 May;47(5):912-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.12.006. Epub 2008 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2007.12.006
PMID:18353605
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Report the results of a phase II multicenter, prospective trial comparing endovascular treatment of descending thoracic aneurysm (TEVAR) with the TAG device to surgical controls after 5 years of follow-up.

METHODS

The Gore TAG trial compared the TAG endograft patients (n = 140) with standard open surgical controls (n = 94) with enrollment from September of 1999 to May of 2001. An additional 51 patients were enrolled in 2003 after revision of the endograft. Follow-up consisted of patient visits, computed tomography (CT) scans and x-rays at 1, 6, and 12 months and yearly. Significant sac size change was defined as >or=5 mm increase or decrease from the 1 month baseline measurement. Migration was defined as >or=10 mm cranial or caudal movement of the device inside the aorta. Significance was determined as P <or= .05.

RESULTS

At 5 years, aneurysm-related mortality was lower for TAG patients at 2.8% compared with open controls at 11.7% (P = .008). No differences in all-cause mortality were noted, with 68% of TAG patients and 67% of open controls surviving to 5 years (P = .43). Major adverse events at 5 years were significantly reduced in the TAG group; 57.9% vs 78.7% (P = .001). Endoleaks in the TAG group decreased from 8.1% at 1 month to 4.3% at 5 years. Five TAG patients have undergone major aneurysm-related re-interventions at 5 years (3.6%), including one arch aneurysm repair for type 1 endoleak and migration, one open conversion and five endovascular procedures for endoleaks in three patients. There were fewer secondary procedures not directly related to aneurysm repair in the TAG vs the open repair group at 5 years, 15.0% vs 31.9%, (P = .01). For TAG patients, sac size at 60 months decreased in 50% and increased in 19% compared with the 1-month baseline. Comparison with the modified low-porosity device at 24 months showed sac increase in 12.9% of original vs 2.9% in modified grafts (P = .11). At 5 years, there have been no ruptures, one migration, no collapse, and 20 instances of fracture in 19 patients, all before the revision of the TAG graft.

CONCLUSIONS

In anatomically suitable patients, TAG treatment of thoracic aneurysms is superior to surgical repair at 5 years. Although sac enlargement is concerning, early modified device results indicate this issue may be resolved.

摘要

目的

报告一项II期多中心前瞻性试验的结果,该试验比较了使用TAG装置进行胸降主动脉瘤腔内治疗(TEVAR)与手术对照组在5年随访后的情况。

方法

戈尔TAG试验将TAG血管内支架移植物患者(n = 140)与标准开放手术对照组(n = 94)进行比较,入组时间为1999年9月至2001年5月。2003年血管内支架移植物修订后又纳入了51例患者。随访包括患者就诊、在1、6和12个月以及每年进行的计算机断层扫描(CT)和X线检查。显著的瘤体大小变化定义为与1个月基线测量值相比增加或减少≥5 mm。移位定义为装置在主动脉内向上或向下移动≥10 mm。显著性判定为P≤0.05。

结果

5年时,TAG患者的动脉瘤相关死亡率为2.8%,低于开放手术对照组的11.7%(P = 0.008)。全因死亡率无差异,68%的TAG患者和67%的开放手术对照组患者存活至5年(P = 0.43)。TAG组5年时的主要不良事件显著减少;分别为57.9%和78.7%(P = 0.001)。TAG组的内漏从1个月时的8.1%降至5年时的4.3%。5年时有5例TAG患者因动脉瘤相关进行了重大再次干预(3.6%),包括1例因I型内漏和移位进行的弓部动脉瘤修复、1例开放手术转换以及3例患者因内漏进行的5次血管内手术。5年时,与开放修复组相比,TAG组中与动脉瘤修复无直接关系的二次手术较少,分别为15.0%和31.9%(P = 0.01)。对于TAG患者,与1个月基线相比,60个月时瘤体大小减小的占50%,增大的占19%。与24个月时的改良低孔隙率装置相比,原始装置组瘤体增大的占12.9%,改良移植物组为2.9%(P = 0.11)。5年时,未发生破裂,1例移位,无塌陷,19例患者中有20例发生骨折,均在TAG移植物修订前。

结论

在解剖结构合适的患者中,TAG治疗胸主动脉瘤5年时优于手术修复。尽管瘤体增大令人担忧,但早期改良装置的结果表明这个问题可能会得到解决。

相似文献

1
Five-year results of endovascular treatment with the Gore TAG device compared with open repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms.使用戈尔TAG装置进行血管内治疗与胸主动脉瘤开放修复的五年结果比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 May;47(5):912-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.12.006. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
2
International controlled clinical trial of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair with the Zenith TX2 endovascular graft: 1-year results.使用Zenith TX2血管内移植物进行胸主动脉瘤腔内修复的国际对照临床试验:1年结果
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Feb;47(2):247-257; discussion 257. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.10.032.
3
Results of a prospective multicenter trial of CTAG thoracic endograft.CTAG胸主动脉内移植物前瞻性多中心试验结果
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Mar;61(3):589-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.09.033.
4
Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms: results of the phase II multicenter trial of the GORE TAG thoracic endoprosthesis.胸主动脉瘤的血管内治疗:GORE TAG胸主动脉腔内移植物II期多中心试验结果
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Jan;41(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.10.046.
5
Pivotal results of the Medtronic Vascular Talent Thoracic Stent Graft System: the VALOR trial.美敦力血管Talent胸主动脉覆膜支架系统的关键结果:VALOR试验
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Sep;48(3):546-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.03.061. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
6
Long-term outcomes of the conformable TAG thoracic endoprosthesis in a prospective multicenter trial.前瞻性多中心试验中可塑形 TAG 胸主动脉覆膜支架的长期结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Nov;74(5):1491-1498. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.063. Epub 2021 May 20.
7
Endovascular stent grafting versus open surgical repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms in low-risk patients: a multicenter comparative trial.低风险患者降主动脉瘤腔内支架植入术与开放手术修复的多中心对比试验
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Feb;133(2):369-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.07.040. Epub 2007 Jan 8.
8
Propensity-matched cohort validates findings of the VALOR trial.倾向评分匹配队列验证了 VALOR 试验的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jul;54(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.12.052. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
9
Outcome of the pivotal study of the Aptus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysms repair system.Aptus 血管内腹主动脉瘤修复系统关键研究结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Aug;60(2):275-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.02.017.
10
New-generation stent grafts for endovascular management of thoracic pseudoaneurysms after aortic coarctation repair.新一代支架移植物在主动脉缩窄修复后胸主动脉假性动脉瘤的血管内治疗中的应用。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Aug;60(2):330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.02.050. Epub 2014 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Advanced age is significantly associated with poor outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高龄与胸主动脉腔内修复术的不良预后显著相关:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02990-x.
2
Comparison of short-and long-term outcomes between endovascular and open repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胸降主动脉瘤血管内修复与开放修复的短期和长期结果比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2025 Mar 1;111(3):2662-2674. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002230.
3
Thoracic vertebral body erosion due to a perianeurysmal outpouching lesion after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a case report and literature review.
胸主动脉腔内修复术后因动脉瘤周围憩室样病变导致的胸椎椎体侵蚀:一例报告及文献复习
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jan 7;26(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08265-5.
4
Endovascular Repair of Zone 0 Ascending Aortic Aneurysm: A Review of Current Knowledge and Developing Technology.0区升主动脉瘤的血管内修复:当前知识与技术发展综述
Aorta (Stamford). 2024 Feb;12(1):13-19. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791670. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
5
Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Repair of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms.胸主动脉瘤血管内修复的长期结果
Int J Angiol. 2024 May 30;33(4):237-249. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787304. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
The Value of Aortic Volume and Intraluminal Thrombus Quantification for Predicting Aortic Events after Endovascular Thoracic Aneurysm Repair.主动脉容积和腔内血栓定量对预测胸主动脉腔内修复术后主动脉事件的价值
J Clin Med. 2024 May 18;13(10):2981. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102981.
7
Endovascular Repair in Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury: A 10-Year Single Center Experience.钝性胸主动脉损伤的血管腔内修复:一项为期10年的单中心经验
Cureus. 2024 Mar 1;16(3):e55327. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55327. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
Animal Models, Pathogenesis, and Potential Treatment of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm.动物模型、发病机制和胸主动脉瘤的潜在治疗方法。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jan 11;25(2):901. doi: 10.3390/ijms25020901.
9
2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022 ACC/AHA 血管疾病诊断与管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会联合委员会临床实践指南的报告。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Nov;166(5):e182-e331. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.04.023. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
10
Clinical outcomes of Najuta thoracic stent graft system for arch aneurysms.Najuta胸主动脉覆膜支架系统治疗主动脉弓部动脉瘤的临床疗效
Front Surg. 2023 May 16;10:1167714. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1167714. eCollection 2023.