Wang Tracy Y, Chen Anita Y, Peterson Eric D, Becker Richard C, Gibler W Brian, Ohman E Magnus, Roe Matthew T
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 2400 Pratt Street, Room 0311, Terrace Level, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Eur Heart J. 2008 May;29(9):1103-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn126. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
To examine treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE ACS) receiving long-term warfarin anticoagulation.
We examined acute medication and invasive cardiac procedure use and in-hospital outcomes among 101,078 patients with NSTE ACS included in the CRUSADE registry. On admission, 7201 patients (7%) were on home warfarin therapy. Compared with non-anticoagulated patients, these patients were older and had more comorbidities, but were less likely to receive acute antiplatelet and antithrombin medications. Patients on warfarin were also less likely to undergo coronary angiography (adjusted OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.70-0.86) and percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.75-0.86), and had longer waiting times for these procedures when performed. Although patients on warfarin had higher rates of death and major bleeding compared with non-anticoagulated patients, these differences were no longer significant after multivariable adjustment [ORs 0.90 (95% CI 0.80-1.02) and 1.02 (95% CI 0.93-1.11)]. Among patients on warfarin, however, early use of antiplatelet medications was associated with increased transfusion risk.
Despite higher-risk characteristics, warfarin-anticoagulated patients are often more conservatively managed, as early use of antithrombotic therapies may be associated with increased bleeding. Further investigation is needed to determine the optimal choice of therapies for this population.
研究接受长期华法林抗凝治疗的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE ACS)患者的治疗模式及预后。
我们在CRUSADE注册研究纳入的101,078例NSTE ACS患者中,研究了急性药物使用、侵入性心脏手术情况及住院期间的预后。入院时,7201例患者(7%)正在接受家庭华法林治疗。与未抗凝患者相比,这些患者年龄更大,合并症更多,但接受急性抗血小板和抗凝血酶药物治疗的可能性较小。服用华法林的患者接受冠状动脉造影(校正OR 0.77,95% CI 0.70 - 0.86)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(校正OR 0.80,95% CI 0.75 - 0.86)的可能性也较小,且进行这些手术时等待时间更长。尽管服用华法林的患者与未抗凝患者相比死亡和大出血发生率更高,但多变量调整后这些差异不再显著[OR分别为0.90(95% CI 0.80 - 1.02)和1.02(95% CI 0.93 - 1.11)]。然而,在服用华法林的患者中,早期使用抗血小板药物与输血风险增加相关。
尽管具有较高风险特征,但华法林抗凝患者的治疗往往更为保守,因为早期使用抗血栓治疗可能会增加出血风险。需要进一步研究以确定该人群治疗的最佳选择。