• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

海色宽视场传感器转移至轨道实验

SeaWiFS transfer-to-orbit experiment.

作者信息

Barnes R A, Eplee R E, Biggar S F, Thome K J, Zalewski E F, Slater P N, Holmes A W

机构信息

General Sciences Corporation, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA.

出版信息

Appl Opt. 2000 Oct 20;39(30):5620-31. doi: 10.1364/ao.39.005620.

DOI:10.1364/ao.39.005620
PMID:18354559
Abstract

We present the results of an experiment designed to measure the changes in the radiometric calibration of the Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) from the time of its manufacture to the time of the start of on-orbit operations. The experiment uses measurements of the Sun at the manufacturer's facility to predict the instrument outputs during solar measurements immediately after launch. Because an onboard diffuser plate is required for these measurements, the experiment measures changes in the instrument-diffuser system. There is no mechanism in this experiment to separate changes in the diffuser from changes in the instrument. For the eight SeaWiFS bands, the initial instrument outputs on orbit averaged 0.8% higher than predicted with a standard deviation of 0.9%. The greatest difference was 2.1% (actual output higher than predicted) for band 3. The estimated uncertainty for the experiment is 3%. Thus the transfer-to-orbit experiment shows no changes in the radiometric sensitivities of the SeaWiFS bands--at the 3% level--from the completion of the instrument's manufacture to its insertion into orbit.

摘要

我们展示了一项实验的结果,该实验旨在测量海景宽视场传感器(SeaWiFS)从制造之时到在轨运行开始之时辐射定标的变化。该实验利用在制造商工厂对太阳的测量来预测发射后立即进行太阳测量期间仪器的输出。由于这些测量需要一块机载漫射板,因此该实验测量仪器 - 漫射板系统的变化。在这个实验中没有机制将漫射板的变化与仪器的变化区分开来。对于SeaWiFS的八个波段,在轨初始仪器输出平均比预测值高0.8%,标准差为0.9%。最大差异出现在3波段,为2.1%(实际输出高于预测值)。该实验的估计不确定度为3%。因此,从仪器制造完成到其进入轨道,在轨转移实验表明在3%的水平上,SeaWiFS各波段的辐射灵敏度没有变化。

相似文献

1
SeaWiFS transfer-to-orbit experiment.海色宽视场传感器转移至轨道实验
Appl Opt. 2000 Oct 20;39(30):5620-31. doi: 10.1364/ao.39.005620.
2
Calibration of SeaWiFS. I. Direct techniques.SeaWiFS的校准。一、直接技术。
Appl Opt. 2001 Dec 20;40(36):6682-700. doi: 10.1364/ao.40.006682.
3
Reflectance-based calibration of SeaWiFS. I. Calibration coefficients.基于反射率的海色宽视场传感器(SeaWiFS)校准。I. 校准系数。
Appl Opt. 2003 Mar 20;42(9):1629-47. doi: 10.1364/ao.42.001629.
4
Changes in the Radiometric sensitivity of SeaWiFS determined from lunar and solar-based measurements.通过基于月球和太阳的测量确定的SeaWiFS辐射测量灵敏度的变化。
Appl Opt. 1999 Jul 20;38(21):4649-64. doi: 10.1364/ao.38.004649.
5
Reflectance-based calibration of SeaWiFS. II. Conversion to radiance.基于反射率的海色宽视场传感器(SeaWiFS)校准。II. 转换为辐亮度。
Appl Opt. 2003 Mar 20;42(9):1648-60. doi: 10.1364/ao.42.001648.
6
SeaWiFS long-term solar diffuser reflectance and sensor noise analyses.海色宽视场传感器(SeaWiFS)长期太阳漫射器反射率及传感器噪声分析
Appl Opt. 2007 Feb 10;46(5):762-73. doi: 10.1364/ao.46.000762.
7
On-orbit calibration of SeaWiFS.海色宽视场传感器(SeaWiFS)的在轨校准
Appl Opt. 2012 Dec 20;51(36):8702-30. doi: 10.1364/AO.51.008702.
8
Comparison of SeaWiFS measurements of the Moon with the U.S. Geological Survey lunar model.SeaWiFS对月球的测量结果与美国地质调查局月球模型的比较。
Appl Opt. 2004 Nov 1;43(31):5838-54. doi: 10.1364/ao.43.005838.
9
On-orbit calibration of the Suomi National Polar-Orbiting Partnership Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite for ocean color applications.用于海洋颜色应用的苏梅国家极轨伙伴关系可见红外成像辐射计组的在轨校准。
Appl Opt. 2015 Mar 10;54(8):1984-2006. doi: 10.1364/AO.54.001984.
10
SeaWiFS on-orbit gain and detector calibrations: effect on ocean products.SeaWiFS在轨增益和探测器校准:对海洋产品的影响。
Appl Opt. 2007 Sep 20;46(27):6733-50. doi: 10.1364/ao.46.006733.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultra-portable field transfer radiometer for vicarious calibration of earth imaging sensors.用于对地成像传感器替代定标的超便携式现场传输辐射计。
Metrologia. 2018 Jun;55(3):S104-S117. doi: 10.1088/1681-7575/aab311. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
2
Comparison of two methodologies for calibrating satellite instruments in the visible and near-infrared.两种用于校准可见和近红外卫星仪器的方法的比较。
Appl Opt. 2015 Dec 10;54(35):10376-96. doi: 10.1364/AO.54.010376.