Scherbaum W A, Schweizer A, Mari A, Nilsson P M, Lalanne G, Wang Y, Dunning B E, Foley J E
Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Rheumatology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008 Nov;10(11):1114-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00875.x. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
To assess the 2-year efficacy and tolerability of vildagliptin (50 mg once daily) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and mild hyperglycaemia.
This was a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comprising a 52-week core study with a 4-week, active treatment-free washout followed by a 52-week extension study with another washout period conducted in 131 drug-naïve patients with T2DM and mild hyperglycaemia [glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) 6.2-7.2%]. All patients received lifestyle counselling at each study visit. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed during visits at weeks 0 (core study baseline), 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52 of active treatment; at week 56 (i.e. after the first washout period); at weeks 68, 80, 96 and 108 and at week 112 (i.e. after the second washout period). Standard meal tests were also performed at weeks 0, 24, 52, 56, 80, 108 and 112 to assess postprandial glycaemia and beta-cell function, which was quantified by glucose area under the curve (AUC(0-2) (h))/insulin secretory rate (ISR) AUC(0-2) (h) (ISR/G). Changes from baseline and between-treatment differences (placebo-adjusted changes from baseline during vildagliptin treatment) were analysed by ancova.
The placebo-adjusted change from week 0 in HbA(1c) was -0.3 +/- 0.1% after 1 year of vildagliptin treatment (p < 0.001) and -0.5 +/- 0.2% after 2 years (p = 0.008). The placebo-adjusted change from core study baseline in fasting plasma glucose, in glucose AUC(0-2) (h) and in the beta-cell function parameter, ISR/G, tended to be greater after 2 years than after 1 year of treatment with vildagliptin. Even after a 4-week washout, the placebo-adjusted change from week 0 to week 112 in ISR/G was 3.2 +/- 1.6 pmol/min/m(2)/mM (p = 0.058) and the placebo-adjusted difference in the change from week 0 to week 112 in HbA(1c) was -0.3 +/- 0.1% (p = 0.051). The incidences of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and discontinuations because of AEs were similar in the two treatment groups, and hypoglycaemic episodes were reported by no patient receiving vildagliptin and by two patients receiving placebo.
In drug-naïve patients with mild hyperglycaemia, 2-year treatment with vildagliptin 50 mg once daily attenuated the progressive loss of glycaemic control seen in patients receiving only lifestyle counselling (and placebo). This appears to be because of a corresponding attenuation of the deterioration of beta-cell function as assessed by ISR/G.
评估维格列汀(每日一次,每次50毫克)对2型糖尿病(T2DM)合并轻度高血糖患者的两年疗效及耐受性。
这是一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,纳入131例初治的T2DM合并轻度高血糖患者[糖化血红蛋白(HbA(1c))为6.2 - 7.2%],包括一项为期52周的核心研究,随后是4周的无活性治疗洗脱期,接着是另一项52周的延长期研究及另一个洗脱期。每次研究访视时所有患者均接受生活方式咨询。在活性治疗的第0周(核心研究基线)、第4、8、12、16、24、32、40和52周的访视期间评估疗效和耐受性;在第56周(即第一个洗脱期后);在第68、80、96和108周以及第112周(即第二个洗脱期后)进行评估。在第0、24、52、56、80、108和112周还进行标准餐试验,以评估餐后血糖和β细胞功能,通过曲线下葡萄糖面积(AUC(0 - 2)(h))/胰岛素分泌率(ISR)AUC(0 - 2)(h)(ISR/G)进行量化。通过协方差分析(ancova)分析与基线的变化以及治疗组间差异(维格列汀治疗期间相对于基线的安慰剂调整变化)。
维格列汀治疗1年后,相对于第0周,安慰剂调整后的HbA(1c)变化为 -0.3±0.1%(p < 0.001),治疗2年后为 -0.5±0.2%(p = 0.008)。与核心研究基线相比,维格列汀治疗2年后,空腹血糖、葡萄糖AUC(0 - 2)(h)以及β细胞功能参数ISR/G的安慰剂调整变化相较于治疗1年后往往更大。即使经过4周的洗脱期,从第0周到第112周,ISR/G的安慰剂调整变化为3.2±1.6 pmol/min/m(2)/mM(p = 0.058),从第0周到第112周HbA(1c)变化的安慰剂调整差异为 -0.3±0.1%(p = 0.051)。两个治疗组的不良事件(AE)、严重AE以及因AE导致停药的发生率相似,接受维格列汀治疗的患者未报告低血糖发作,接受安慰剂治疗的患者有2例报告低血糖发作。
在初治的轻度高血糖患者中,每日一次服用50毫克维格列汀进行2年治疗,可减轻仅接受生活方式咨询(及安慰剂)患者中出现的血糖控制逐渐丧失情况。这似乎是由于通过ISR/G评估的β细胞功能恶化得到相应减轻。