Gu Shuyan, Hu Xiaoqian, Shi Lizheng, Zhen Xuemei, Sun Xueshan, Huang Minzhuo, Gu Yuxuan, Dong Hengjin
Center for Health Policy and Management Studies, School of Government, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.
College of Politics and Public Administration, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China.
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 30;11(23):7094. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237094.
There are multiple glucose-lowering drugs available as alternative initial monotherapy for type 2 diabetes patients with contraindications or intolerance to metformin. However, little comparative and systematic data are available for them as initial monotherapy. This study estimated and compared the treatment effects of glucose-lowering drugs as initial monotherapy for type 2 diabetes.
PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, Chongqing VIP, and WanFang Data from 1 January 1990 until 31 December 2020 were searched for randomized controlled trials which compared a glucose-lowering drug with placebo/lifestyle-intervention for type 2 diabetes. Drug classes included metformin, sulfonylureas (SUs), thiazolidinediones (TZDs), glinides (NIDEs), α-glucosidase inhibitors (AGIs), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), insulins (INSs), and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs).
A total of 185 trials were included, identifying 38,376 patients from 56 countries across six continents. When choosing an initial drug monotherapy alternative to metformin, SUs were most efficacious in reducing HbA1c (-1.39%; 95% CI -1.63, -1.16) and FPG (-2.70 mmol/L; 95% CI -3.18, -2.23), but increased hypoglycemia risks (5.44; 95% CI 2.11, 14.02). GLP-1RAs were most efficacious in reducing BMI (-1.05 kg/m; 95% CI -1.81, -0.29) and TC (-0.42 mmol/L; 95% CI -0.61, -0.22). TZDs were most efficacious in increasing HDL-C (0.12 mmol/L; 95% CI 0.07, 0.17). SGLT2is were most efficacious in lowering SBP (-4.18 mmHg; 95% CI -4.84, -3.53). While AGIs conferred higher risk of AE-induced discontinuations (2.57; 95% CI 1.64, 4.03). Overall, only GLP-1RAs showed an integrated beneficial effect on all outcomes. Our results also confirmed the intraclass differences in treatment effects across drugs. Most trials were short-term, and no significant differences in mortality, total vascular events, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, or diabetic nephropathy were observed across drug classes.
Our results suggest a potential treatment hierarchy for decision-makers, with GLP-1RAs being the preferred alternative therapy to metformin regarding their favorable efficacy and safety profiles.
对于有二甲双胍禁忌证或不耐受的2型糖尿病患者,有多种降糖药物可作为替代初始单药治疗。然而,关于它们作为初始单药治疗的比较性和系统性数据很少。本研究评估并比较了降糖药物作为2型糖尿病初始单药治疗的效果。
检索了1990年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间的PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、中国知网、重庆维普和万方数据,查找比较降糖药物与安慰剂/生活方式干预用于2型糖尿病的随机对照试验。药物类别包括二甲双胍、磺脲类(SUs)、噻唑烷二酮类(TZDs)、格列奈类(NIDEs)、α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂(AGIs)、二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4is)、钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2is)、胰岛素(INSs)和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)。
共纳入185项试验,确定了来自六大洲56个国家的38376名患者。在选择替代二甲双胍的初始药物单药治疗时,SUs在降低糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)(-1.39%;95%CI -1.63,-1.16)和空腹血糖(FPG)(-2.70 mmol/L;95%CI -3.18,-2.23)方面最有效,但低血糖风险增加(5.44;95%CI 2.11,14.02)。GLP-1RAs在降低体重指数(BMI)(-1.05 kg/m;95%CI -1.81,-0.29)和总胆固醇(TC)(-0.42 mmol/L;95%CI -0.61,-0.22)方面最有效。TZDs在升高高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)(0.12 mmol/L;95%CI 0.07,0.17)方面最有效。SGLT2is在降低收缩压(SBP)(-4.18 mmHg;95%CI -4.84,-3.53)方面最有效。而AGIs导致因不良事件停药的风险更高(2.57;95%CI 1.64,4.03)。总体而言,只有GLP-1RAs对所有结局显示出综合有益效果。我们的结果也证实了不同药物在治疗效果上的类内差异。大多数试验是短期的,各药物类别在死亡率、总血管事件、心肌梗死、心力衰竭、中风或糖尿病肾病方面未观察到显著差异。
我们的结果为决策者提供了一个潜在的治疗分级,就其良好的疗效和安全性而言,GLP-1RAs是二甲双胍的首选替代疗法。