• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切除基底细胞癌:比较全科医生、医院皮肤科专家及其他医院专科医生的表现。

Excising basal cell carcinomas: comparing the performance of general practitioners, hospital skin specialists and other hospital specialists.

作者信息

Murchie P, Delaney E K, Thompson W D, Lee A J

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

Clin Exp Dermatol. 2008 Aug;33(5):565-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2008.02710.x. Epub 2008 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2230.2008.02710.x
PMID:18355357
Abstract

BACKGROUND

General practitioners (GPs) are not encouraged to excise basal cell carcinomas (BCCs). Despite this, as many of 10% of BCCs may be excised by GPs. GPs may be able to have a greater role in the diagnosis and management of BCC, but much needs to be learnt before this can be advocated.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the practice of GPs, skin specialists (dermatologists and plastic surgeons) and other hospital specialists in excising BCCs.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all BCCs excised in the Grampian region between 1 January and 31 December 2005 was carried out In total, 1087 reports were rated for source, quality of clinical information provided and extent of excision.

RESULTS

GPs perform significantly less well than skin specialists when diagnosing and excising BCCs, but appear equal in diagnostic skill and better at excision than other hospital specialists. Non-specialized GPs appear to perform as well as GPs with special interest (GPwSI) in adequately excising BCCs. In 18.7% of all cases, the information supplied to the pathologist with the biopsy sample was inadequate to draw a conclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

GPs compare unfavourably with skin specialists in diagnosing and excising BCCs. The performance of nonspecialized GPs does not appear to differ markedly from that of GPwSI. There is considerable room to optimize current GP performance, particularly with lesions of the head and neck, and it may be that novel approaches to GP training are required to achieve this. Structured request forms may improve the quality of clinical information provided when skin biopsies are submitted for pathological examination.

摘要

背景

一般不鼓励全科医生(GP)切除基底细胞癌(BCC)。尽管如此,仍有多达10%的基底细胞癌可能由全科医生切除。全科医生在基底细胞癌的诊断和管理中或许能发挥更大作用,但在提倡这点之前还有很多需要了解的。

目的

比较全科医生、皮肤专科医生(皮肤科医生和整形外科医生)以及其他医院专科医生切除基底细胞癌的做法。

方法

对2005年1月1日至12月31日在格兰扁地区切除的所有基底细胞癌进行回顾性分析。总共对1087份报告的来源、提供的临床信息质量和切除范围进行了评级。

结果

在诊断和切除基底细胞癌方面,全科医生的表现明显不如皮肤专科医生,但在诊断技能方面似乎相当,且在切除方面比其他医院专科医生更好。非专科全科医生在充分切除基底细胞癌方面的表现似乎与有特殊兴趣的全科医生(GPwSI)相当。在所有病例的18.7%中,随活检样本提供给病理学家的信息不足以得出结论。

结论

在诊断和切除基底细胞癌方面,全科医生与皮肤专科医生相比处于劣势。非专科全科医生的表现与有特殊兴趣的全科医生似乎没有明显差异。目前全科医生的表现有很大的优化空间,特别是对于头颈部病变,可能需要新的全科医生培训方法来实现这一点。结构化申请表可能会提高提交皮肤活检进行病理检查时提供的临床信息质量。

相似文献

1
Excising basal cell carcinomas: comparing the performance of general practitioners, hospital skin specialists and other hospital specialists.切除基底细胞癌:比较全科医生、医院皮肤科专家及其他医院专科医生的表现。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2008 Aug;33(5):565-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2008.02710.x. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
2
Excising squamous cell carcinomas: comparing the performance of GPs, hospital skin specialists and other hospital specialists.切除鳞状细胞癌:比较全科医生、医院皮肤科专家和其他医院专家的表现。
Fam Pract. 2012 Oct;29(5):541-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms007. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
3
Factors contributing to incomplete excision of nonmelanoma skin cancer by Australian general practitioners.澳大利亚全科医生导致非黑色素瘤皮肤癌切除不完全的因素。
Arch Dermatol. 2009 Nov;145(11):1253-60. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.270.
4
Management of basal cell carcinoma by surveyed dermatologists in Scotland.苏格兰皮肤科医生对基底细胞癌的治疗
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2006 Sep;31(5):648-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2006.02199.x.
5
Skin cancer excision performance in Scottish primary and secondary care: a retrospective analysis.苏格兰初级和二级医疗保健中皮肤癌切除手术的实施情况:一项回顾性分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Aug;64(625):e465-70. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X680929.
6
A comparison of dermatologists', surgeons' and general practitioners' surgical management of cutaneous melanoma.皮肤科医生、外科医生和全科医生对皮肤黑色素瘤手术治疗的比较。
Br J Dermatol. 2004 Sep;151(3):636-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06065.x.
7
Skin cancer in general practice in South Australia. A five year study.南澳大利亚州全科医疗中的皮肤癌。一项为期五年的研究。
Aust Fam Physician. 1999 Jan;28 Suppl 1:S28-31.
8
Are there sufficient numbers of low-risk basal cell carcinomas to justify general practitioners (family physicians) carrying out basal cell carcinoma surgery?是否有足够数量的低风险基底细胞癌病例,足以证明全科医生(家庭医生)开展基底细胞癌手术的合理性?
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2016 Mar;41(2):138-41. doi: 10.1111/ced.12718. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
9
Rate of incomplete excision of basal cell carcinomas by General Practitioners with Special Interest.具有特殊兴趣的全科医生对基底细胞癌的不完全切除率。
Br J Dermatol. 2009 Jul;161(1):187. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09129.x. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
10
Differences in Rate of Complete Excision of Basal Cell Carcinoma by Dermatologists, Plastic Surgeons and General Practitioners: A Large Cross-Sectional Study.皮肤科医生、整形外科医生和全科医生切除基底细胞癌完全切除率的差异:一项大型横断面研究。
Dermatology. 2018;234(3-4):86-91. doi: 10.1159/000490344. Epub 2018 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring the quality of skin cancer management in primary care: A scoping review.测量初级保健中皮肤癌管理的质量:范围综述。
Australas J Dermatol. 2023 May;64(2):177-193. doi: 10.1111/ajd.14023. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
2
Clinico-Pathological Correlation in Dermatological Disorders: A Retrospective Audit of 332 Skin Biopsies from a Tertiary Care Center.皮肤病的临床病理相关性:对一家三级医疗中心332例皮肤活检的回顾性审计
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2022 Dec 14;14(1):61-66. doi: 10.4103/idoj.idoj_241_22. eCollection 2023 Jan-Feb.
3
Clinicopathological Factors Associated with Incomplete Excision of High-risk Basal Cell Carcinoma.
与高危基底细胞癌不完全切除相关的临床病理因素。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2021 Jul 13;101(7):adv00496. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3856.
4
Surgery for Bowen Disease: Clinicopathological Factors Associated With Incomplete Excision.鲍恩病的手术治疗:与切除不完全相关的临床病理因素
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2021 Apr 12;11(2):e2021046. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1102a46. eCollection 2021 Mar.
5
Incomplete Excisions of Melanocytic Lesions: Rates and Risk Factors.黑素细胞病变不完全切除:发生率及危险因素。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2021 Mar 23;101(3):adv00421. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3784.
6
Basal Cell Carcinoma Surgery in general practice: Is there a role for the local General Practitioner?基层医疗中的基底细胞癌手术:当地全科医生能发挥作用吗?
Malays Fam Physician. 2020 Nov 10;15(3):10-21. eCollection 2020.
7
Minor surgery in general practice in Ireland- a report of workload and safety.爱尔兰全科医学中的小手术——工作量和安全性报告。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jun 23;21(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01186-x.
8
Clinicopathological concordance in the diagnosis of skin diseases: a retrospective analysis of 5000 histopathology reports.皮肤疾病诊断中的临床病理一致性:对5000份组织病理学报告的回顾性分析
Ann Saudi Med. 2019 Nov-Dec;39(6):388-394. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2019.388. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
9
Who Should Carry Out Skin Cancer Excisions? A Systematic Review.谁应该进行皮肤癌切除术?一项系统评价。
J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2019 Jul-Sep;12(3):153-157. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_174_18.
10
Substitution of low-risk skin cancer hospital care towards primary care: A qualitative study on views of general practitioners and dermatologists.低危皮肤癌的医院护理向初级保健的替代:全科医生和皮肤科医生观点的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 19;14(3):e0213595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213595. eCollection 2019.