Takeda M, Nakajima H, Zhang M, Hiratsuka T
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
J Contam Hydrol. 2008 Apr 28;97(3-4):117-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
To obtain reliable diffusion parameters for diffusion testing, multiple experiments should not only be cross-checked but the internal consistency of each experiment should also be verified. In the through- and in-diffusion tests with solution reservoirs, test interpretation of different phases often makes use of simplified analytical solutions. This study explores the feasibility of steady, quasi-steady, equilibrium and transient-state analyses using simplified analytical solutions with respect to (i) valid conditions for each analytical solution, (ii) potential error, and (iii) experimental time. For increased generality, a series of numerical analyses are performed using unified dimensionless parameters and the results are all related to dimensionless reservoir volume (DRV) which includes only the sorptive parameter as an unknown. This means the above factors can be investigated on the basis of the sorption properties of the testing material and/or tracer. The main findings are that steady, quasi-steady and equilibrium-state analyses are applicable when the tracer is not highly sorptive. However, quasi-steady and equilibrium-state analyses become inefficient or impractical compared to steady state analysis when the tracer is non-sorbing and material porosity is significantly low. Systematic and comprehensive reformulation of analytical models enables the comparison of experimental times between different test methods. The applicability and potential error of each test interpretation can also be studied. These can be applied in designing, performing, and interpreting diffusion experiments by deducing DRV from the available information for the target material and tracer, combined with the results of this study.
为了获得可靠的扩散测试参数,不仅应对多个实验进行交叉核对,还应验证每个实验的内部一致性。在使用溶液储库的透扩散和内扩散测试中,不同阶段的测试解释通常使用简化的解析解。本研究探讨了使用简化解析解进行稳态、准稳态、平衡态和瞬态分析的可行性,涉及(i)每个解析解的有效条件,(ii)潜在误差,以及(iii)实验时间。为了提高通用性,使用统一的无量纲参数进行了一系列数值分析,结果均与无量纲储库体积(DRV)相关,其中仅将吸附参数作为未知量。这意味着上述因素可以基于测试材料和/或示踪剂的吸附特性进行研究。主要发现是,当示踪剂吸附性不强时,稳态、准稳态和平衡态分析适用。然而,当示踪剂不吸附且材料孔隙率显著较低时,与稳态分析相比,准稳态和平衡态分析变得效率低下或不切实际。对解析模型进行系统而全面的重新表述,可以比较不同测试方法之间的实验时间。还可以研究每种测试解释的适用性和潜在误差。通过从目标材料和示踪剂的可用信息中推导DRV,并结合本研究结果,这些可应用于扩散实验的设计、实施和解释。