Marschner N W, Adler M, Nagel G A, Christmann D, Fenzl E, Upadhyaya B
Universitätsklinikum, Göttingen, Germany.
Eur J Cancer. 1991;27(9):1137-40. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90311-z.
Ondansetron was compared with metoclopramide for antiemetic efficacy in a randomised double-blind trial in 122 patients with advanced breast cancer. All patients were treated with epirubicin (greater than 50 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (greater than 500 mg/m2). 50 patients receiving ondansetron and 60 with metoclopramide were considered evaluable. Ondansetron was at least as effective as metoclopramide in the control of vomiting and nausea. The percentage of patients with complete plus major control was 72% (59-85%) vs. 61% (48-74%) on day 1 (P = 0.230) and 79% (67-91%) vs. 66% (53-78%) on days 2-3 after chemotherapy (P = 0.122). Over the 3-day study period, nausea was absent or mild in 60% of the patients treated with ondansetron, compared to 45% given metoclopramide (P = 0.064). No major drug-related side-effects were reported. 1 patient receiving ondansetron experienced gastrointestinal disturbance and headache. Episodes of diarrhoea, fever, hyperkinetic syndrome, fatigue, restlessness and migraine with vomiting were reported by 5 patients treated with metoclopramide. None of the changes in the biochemical or haematological parameters was attributed to the antiemetic treatments.
在一项针对122例晚期乳腺癌患者的随机双盲试验中,对昂丹司琼和甲氧氯普胺的止吐疗效进行了比较。所有患者均接受表柔比星(大于50mg/m²)和环磷酰胺(大于500mg/m²)治疗。50例接受昂丹司琼治疗的患者和60例接受甲氧氯普胺治疗的患者被视为可评估对象。昂丹司琼在控制呕吐和恶心方面至少与甲氧氯普胺一样有效。第1天完全加主要控制的患者百分比分别为72%(59 - 85%)和61%(48 - 74%)(P = 0.230),化疗后第2 - 3天分别为79%(67 - 91%)和66%(53 - 78%)(P = 0.122)。在为期3天的研究期间,接受昂丹司琼治疗的患者中有60%恶心消失或轻微,而接受甲氧氯普胺治疗的患者为45%(P = 0.064)。未报告严重的药物相关副作用。1例接受昂丹司琼治疗的患者出现胃肠道不适和头痛。5例接受甲氧氯普胺治疗的患者报告了腹泻、发热、运动亢进综合征、疲劳、烦躁不安和伴有呕吐的偏头痛发作。生化或血液学参数的变化均未归因于止吐治疗。