Hendee W R
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226.
Med Prog Technol. 1991;17(2):69-75.
The contribution of medical technologies to the rising costs of health care is generating increasing enthusiasm for application of methods for assessing the impact of the technologies on health care cost and quality. Various assessment methods are available, ranging from rigorous Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials to informal Opinion Surveys of practitioners experienced with the technologies. Between these extremes are techniques such as Performance Analysis, Case Series, Case Studies, Metanalysis and Consensus Development. In the United States several institutions are involved in the technology assessment process. These institutions include government agencies, third-party carriers, advisory groups, and professional organizations. Currently these institutions emphasize variables such as safety, effectiveness and, less frequently, cost-effectiveness as criteria of technology assessment. However, outcome measures such as morbidity and mortality statistics and 'quality of life' parameters are receiving increased attention as more penetrating criteria for technology assessment.
医疗技术对医疗保健成本上升的影响,正激发人们对运用各种方法来评估这些技术对医疗保健成本和质量影响的兴趣日益浓厚。有多种评估方法可供使用,从严格的随机对照临床试验到对熟悉这些技术的从业者进行的非正式意见调查。介于这两个极端之间的技术包括绩效分析、病例系列、案例研究、荟萃分析和共识发展。在美国,有几个机构参与技术评估过程。这些机构包括政府机构、第三方承保机构、咨询小组和专业组织。目前,这些机构强调安全性、有效性等变量,以及较少提及的成本效益作为技术评估标准。然而,发病率和死亡率统计以及“生活质量”参数等结果指标,作为更具洞察力的技术评估标准正受到越来越多的关注。