• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

技术评估:方法与报销

Technology assessment: approach and reimbursement.

作者信息

Yaszemski Michael J, Polly David W, Boden Scott D, Andersson Gunnar B J

机构信息

Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 May 15;32(11 Suppl):S39-43. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318054d0a0.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318054d0a0
PMID:17495585
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Review of technology assessment process for novel spine patient care.

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the issues surrounding the introduction of novel technologies for spine patient care.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The parties involved in the technology development and assessment process include clinicians, researchers, academic institutions, governmental organizations, and private health care payors.

METHODS

Description of the responsibilities and processes of various parties involved in technology assessment.

RESULTS

The process for introduction of novel spine technologies is complex and will become more efficient as each party involved increases its understanding of the roles played by all the others.

CONCLUSIONS

The technology assessment process involves clinicians, researchers, governmental agencies, and private payors. All must work in concert for the efficient introduction of safe, efficacious, reasonable, and cost-effective novel treatments for spine patients.

摘要

研究设计

新型脊柱患者护理技术评估过程的综述。

目的

探讨围绕新型脊柱患者护理技术引入的相关问题。

背景数据总结

参与技术开发和评估过程的各方包括临床医生、研究人员、学术机构、政府组织和私人医疗保健支付方。

方法

描述技术评估中各方的职责和流程。

结果

新型脊柱技术的引入过程复杂,随着各参与方对彼此所扮演角色的理解不断加深,该过程将变得更加高效。

结论

技术评估过程涉及临床医生、研究人员、政府机构和私人支付方。各方必须协同合作,以便为脊柱患者高效引入安全、有效、合理且具有成本效益的新型治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Technology assessment: approach and reimbursement.技术评估:方法与报销
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 May 15;32(11 Suppl):S39-43. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318054d0a0.
2
Medicare payment for new technologies. Can the process be improved despite conflicting goals? An ECRI technology management assessment.医疗保险对新技术的支付。尽管目标相互冲突,这个过程能否得到改进?一项医疗保健研究与质量机构(ECRI)的技术管理评估。
J Health Care Technol. 1986 Summer;3(1):13-32.
3
Technology assessment in medicine: methods, status and trends.医学技术评估:方法、现状与趋势
Med Prog Technol. 1991;17(2):69-75.
4
A changing paradigm in the study and adoption of emerging health care technologies: coverage with evidence development.新兴医疗技术研究与应用中的范式转变:基于证据生成的覆盖范围
J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Nov;5(11):1125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.06.008.
5
Technology assessment in healthcare: a review and description of a "best practice" technology assessment process.医疗保健中的技术评估:“最佳实践”技术评估过程的综述与描述
Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc. 1997 Nov-Dec;2(6):240-53.
6
Early dialogue between the developers of new technologies and pricing and reimbursement agencies: a pilot study.新技术开发者与定价和报销机构的早期对话:一项试点研究。
Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):608-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.011.
7
Medical and dental technology assessment.医学与牙科技术评估
Technol Health Care. 1996 Sep;4(3):291-303.
8
Satisfying the requirements of the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services.满足美国食品药品监督管理局以及医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的要求。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Mar;5(3):189-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.09.005.
9
Conditionally funded field evaluations and practical trial design within a health technology assessment framework.卫生技术评估框架内的有条件资助的现场评估和实际试验设计。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 May;6(5):324-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.01.023.
10
The Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Technology Evaluation Center: how we evaluate radiology technologies.蓝十字蓝盾协会技术评估中心:我们如何评估放射技术。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2005 Jan;2(1):33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.07.002.