Xu Q G, Midha R, Martinez J A, Guo G F, Zochodne D W
Department of Clinical Neurosciences and the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive Northwest, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Neuroscience. 2008 Apr 9;152(4):877-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.01.060. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
During regeneration of injured peripheral nerves, local conditions may influence how regenerative axon sprouts emerge from parent axons. More extensive lesions might be expected to disrupt such growth. In this work, we discovered instead that long segmental crush injuries facilitate the growth and maturation of substantially more axon sprouts than do classical short crush injuries (20 mm length vs. 2 mm). At identical distances from the proximal site of axon interruption there was a 45% rise in the numbers of neurofilament labeled axons extending through a long segmental crush zone by 1 week. By 2 weeks, there was a 35% greater density of regenerating myelinated axons in long compared with short crush injuries just beyond (5 mm) the proximal injury site. Moreover, despite the larger numbers of axons, their maturity was identical and they were regular, parallel, associated with Schwann cells (SCs) and essentially indistinguishable between the injuries. Backlabeling with Fluorogold indicated that despite these differences, the axons arose from similar numbers of parent motor and sensory neurons. Neither injury was associated with ischemia. Both injuries were associated with rises in GFAP (glial acidic fibrillary protein) and p75 mRNAs, markers of SC plasticity but p75, GFAP and brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNAs did not differ between the injuries. There was a higher local mRNA level of GAP43/B50 at 7 days following injury and a higher sonic hedgehog protein (Shh) mRNA at 24 h in long crush zones. GAP43/B50 protein and SHH protein both had prominent localization within regenerating axons. Long segmental nerve trunk crush injuries do not impair regeneration but instead generate greater axon plasticity that results in larger numbers of mature myelinated axons. The changes occur without apparent change in SC activation, overall nerve architecture or nerve blood flow. While the mechanism is uncertain, the findings indicate that manipulation of the nerve microenvironment can induce substantial changes in regenerative sprouting.
在受损周围神经的再生过程中,局部条件可能会影响再生轴突芽从母轴突中萌出的方式。预计更广泛的损伤可能会干扰这种生长。然而,在这项研究中,我们发现长节段挤压伤比传统的短挤压伤(20毫米长度与2毫米长度)更能促进更多轴突芽的生长和成熟。在距轴突中断近端相同距离处,1周时穿过长节段挤压区的神经丝标记轴突数量增加了45%。到2周时,与短挤压伤相比,在近端损伤部位之外(5毫米处),长挤压伤中再生有髓轴突的密度高35%。此外,尽管轴突数量较多,但它们的成熟度相同,排列规则、平行,与施万细胞(SCs)相关,并且在两种损伤之间基本无法区分。用荧光金逆行标记表明,尽管存在这些差异,但轴突源自数量相似的母运动神经元和感觉神经元。两种损伤均与缺血无关。两种损伤均与胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)和p75 mRNA水平升高有关,这是SCs可塑性的标志物,但两种损伤之间p75、GFAP和脑源性神经营养因子mRNA并无差异。损伤后7天,长挤压区GAP43/B50的局部mRNA水平较高,损伤后24小时,音猬因子(Shh)mRNA水平较高。GAP43/B50蛋白和SHH蛋白在再生轴突中均有显著定位。长节段神经干挤压伤不会损害再生,反而会产生更大的轴突可塑性,从而导致更多成熟有髓轴突的形成。这些变化发生时,SCs激活、整体神经结构或神经血流没有明显变化。虽然机制尚不确定,但研究结果表明,对神经微环境的操控可诱导再生芽生发生实质性变化。