Rosas Antonio, Bastir Markus, Alarcón Jose Antonio, Kuroe Kazuto
Paleoanthropology Group, Department of Palaeobiology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, C/José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Arch Oral Biol. 2008 Sep;53(9):826-34. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.02.005. Epub 2008 Mar 21.
To test the hypothesis that midline basicranial orientation and posterior cranial base length are discriminating factors between adults of different populations and its potential maxillo/mandibular disharmonies.
Twenty-nine 2D landmarks of the midline cranial base, the face and the mandible of dry skull X-rays from three major populations (45 Asians, 34 Africans, 64 Europeans) were digitized and analysed by geometric morphometrics. We used, first, MANOVA to test for mean shape differences between populations; then, principal components analysis (PCA) to assess the overall variation in the sample and finally, canonical variate analysis (CVA) with jack-knife validations (N=1000) to analyse the anatomical features that best distinguished among populations.
Significant mean shapes differences were shown between populations (P<0.001). CVA revealed two significant axes of discrimination (P<0.001). Jack-knife validation correctly identified 92% of 15,000 unknowns. In Africans the whole cranial base is rotated into a forward-downward position, while in Asians it is rotated in the opposite way. The Europeans occupied an intermediate position. African and Asian samples showed a maxillo/mandibular prognathism. African prognathism was produced by an anterior positioned maxilla, Asian prognathism by retruded anterior cranial base and increase of the posterior cranial base length. Europeans showed a trend towards retracted mandibles with relatively shorter posterior cranial bases.
The results supported the hypothesis that basicranial orientation and posterior cranial base length are valid factors to distinguish between geographic groups. The whole craniofacial configuration underlying a particular maxillo-facial disharmony must be considered in diagnosis, growth predictions and resulting treatment planning.
检验中线颅底方向和后颅底长度是不同人群成年人之间的鉴别因素及其潜在的上颌/下颌不协调的假设。
对来自三个主要人群(45名亚洲人、34名非洲人、64名欧洲人)的干燥颅骨X线片中的中线颅底、面部和下颌骨的29个二维地标进行数字化处理,并通过几何形态计量学进行分析。我们首先使用多变量方差分析(MANOVA)来检验人群之间的平均形状差异;然后,使用主成分分析(PCA)来评估样本中的总体变异,最后,使用带有留一法验证(N = 1000)的典型变量分析(CVA)来分析最能区分不同人群的解剖特征。
人群之间显示出显著的平均形状差异(P < 0.001)。CVA揭示了两个显著的鉴别轴(P < 0.001)。留一法验证正确识别了15000个未知样本中的92%。在非洲人中,整个颅底向前下方旋转,而在亚洲人中则以相反的方式旋转。欧洲人处于中间位置。非洲和亚洲样本表现出上颌/下颌前突。非洲人的前突是由上颌前部位置靠前引起的,亚洲人的前突是由前颅底后缩和后颅底长度增加引起的。欧洲人表现出下颌后缩的趋势,后颅底相对较短。
结果支持了颅底方向和后颅底长度是区分地理群体的有效因素的假设。在诊断、生长预测和由此产生的治疗计划中,必须考虑特定上颌面部不协调背后的整个颅面构型。