Mongrain Valérie, Noujaim Jonathan, Blais Hélène, Dumont Marie
Molecular Chronobiology Laboratory, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Québec, Canada.
Behav Brain Res. 2008 Jun 26;190(1):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
Vigilance levels of 12 morning types (M-types) and 12 evening types (E-types) were investigated after a baseline night, 2 nights of sleep fragmentation (5 min of forced awakening every half-hour) and a recovery night. Sleep timing was adjusted to the preferred sleep schedule of each subject. Daytime vigilance levels were assessed with test series including a scale of subjective alertness, a psychomotor vigilance task (PVT), a waking EEG recording, and a sleep latency test. Test series were administered every 4h, beginning 1.5h after wake time. On the baseline day, significant diurnal variations were found for each vigilance measure, except for the PVT. Diurnal variations were similar in M-types and E-types. Sleep fragmentation decreased vigilance levels on each measure, except the PVT. Effects of sleep fragmentation and recovery were similar in the two chronotypes. These results highlight the similarities in diurnal variations of vigilance in the two chronotypes when studied at their preferred sleep schedule. Results were also compared between chronotypes with extremely early or late circadian phases ("Extreme" subgroup) and between those with similar, intermediate circadian phases ("Intermediate" subgroup). Diurnal variations of subjective alertness and sleep latencies differed between "Extreme" chronotypes but were identical between "Intermediate" chronotypes. There were no major differences in the response to sleep fragmentation in any subgroup. Since phase angles differed by the same amount between chronotypes within each subgroup, the results suggest that a difference in phase angle cannot be the only source of the differences observed in diurnal variations between "Extreme" chronotypes.
在经历一个基线夜晚、两个睡眠碎片化夜晚(每半小时强制唤醒5分钟)和一个恢复夜晚后,对12名早起型(M型)和12名晚睡型(E型)的警觉水平进行了调查。睡眠时间根据每个受试者偏好的睡眠时间表进行调整。白天的警觉水平通过一系列测试进行评估,包括主观警觉性量表、心理运动警觉任务(PVT)、清醒脑电图记录和睡眠潜伏期测试。测试系列从醒来时间后1.5小时开始,每4小时进行一次。在基线日,除PVT外,每项警觉性测量均发现显著的昼夜变化。M型和E型的昼夜变化相似。睡眠碎片化降低了各项测量指标的警觉水平,但PVT除外。两种生物钟类型中睡眠碎片化和恢复的影响相似。这些结果突出了在按照各自偏好的睡眠时间表进行研究时,两种生物钟类型在警觉性昼夜变化方面的相似性。还对生物钟相位极早或极晚的生物钟类型(“极端”亚组)之间以及生物钟相位相似、处于中间状态的生物钟类型(“中间”亚组)之间的结果进行了比较。“极端”生物钟类型之间主观警觉性和睡眠潜伏期的昼夜变化不同,但“中间”生物钟类型之间是相同的。任何亚组对睡眠碎片化的反应都没有重大差异。由于每个亚组内生物钟类型之间的相位角差异相同量度,结果表明相位角差异不可能是“极端”生物钟类型之间昼夜变化差异的唯一来源。