Spotts J V, Shontz F C
Greater Kansas City Mental Health Foundation, Kansas City.
Int J Addict. 1991 Sep;26(9):923-44. doi: 10.3109/10826089109058931.
This report presents a meta-analysis of a series of published 16PF findings which describe score profiles of nine groups of substance users/abusers, a nonuser comparison group, seven psychiatric groups, a group of criminals, and a group of gang delinquents. Analytical procedures include K Means Clustering, Cattell's rp statistic, and Pearson r. Although drug use was found to be associated with various forms of psychiatric diagnoses, it was not found to be associated with any particular form of psychopathology. The 16PF profiles of groups of users of different substances were not homogeneous within groups. Some similarity, however, was found among profiles of alcoholics. No evidence could be found to support the contention that groups of substance abusers yield the particular profile pattern on the 16PF that was ascribed to them in an earlier meta-analyses. Due to the inadequacies of the 16PF in diagnosing psychiatric conditions, it is suggested that a more fruitful direction of future research might be to use Cattell's Clinical Analysis Questionnaire (CAQ).
本报告对一系列已发表的16PF研究结果进行了荟萃分析,这些结果描述了九组药物使用者/滥用者、一个非使用者对照组、七个精神科组、一组罪犯和一组青少年犯罪团伙的得分概况。分析程序包括K均值聚类、卡特尔的rp统计量和皮尔逊相关系数r。虽然发现药物使用与各种形式的精神科诊断有关,但未发现其与任何特定形式的精神病理学有关。不同药物使用者组的16PF概况在组内并不一致。然而,在酗酒者的概况中发现了一些相似之处。没有证据支持以下观点,即药物滥用者组在16PF上呈现出早期荟萃分析中归因于他们的特定概况模式。由于16PF在诊断精神疾病方面存在不足,建议未来研究的一个更有成效的方向可能是使用卡特尔临床分析问卷(CAQ)。