• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾动脉支架内再狭窄的最佳治疗:再次支架置入与单纯血管成形术对比

Optimal treatment of renal artery in-stent restenosis: repeat stent placement versus angioplasty alone.

作者信息

N'Dandu Zola M, Badawi Ramy A, White Christopher J, Grise Mark A, Reilly John P, Jenkins J Stephen, Collins Tyrone J, Ramee Stephen R

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, The Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, USA.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Apr 1;71(5):701-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21509.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.21509
PMID:18360868
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether repeat renal artery stent placement compared with treatment with balloon angioplasty alone results in better patency in patients presenting with renal artery in-stent restenosis (ISR).

BACKGROUND

Although stent placement for renal artery stenosis has been demonstrated to be superior to balloon angioplasty for "de novo" renal artery lesions, the optimal therapy for ISR remains unclear.

METHODS

Between January 1997 and August 2006, 34 consecutive patients (41 renal arteries) with ISR were treated at the discretion of the operator with balloon angioplasty or repeat stent placement. Quantitative angiography was performed before and immediately after intervention and at follow-up. Angiographic follow-up was obtained for clinical indications in 75% of lesions and routine noninvasive follow-up imaging was obtained in 95% of lesions.

RESULTS

Repeat renal artery stent placement demonstrated improved patency compared with balloon angioplasty alone with a 58% reduction in recurrent ISR (29.4% vs. 71.4%, P = 0.02) and a 30% reduction in follow-up diameter stenosis (41% vs. 58.2%, P = 0.03). The repeat stent group also had better secondary patency (P = 0.05) and a greater freedom from repeat ISR (P = 0.01) when compared with balloon angioplasty alone. There was a trend favoring repeat stent placement for cumulative freedom from target vessel revascularization (TVR) (P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat stent placement appears to result in superior patency compared with balloon angioplasty alone for the treatment of renal ISR.

摘要

目的

我们研究了与单纯球囊血管成形术相比,重复肾动脉支架置入术是否能使肾动脉支架内再狭窄(ISR)患者获得更好的通畅率。

背景

虽然肾动脉狭窄的支架置入术已被证明在治疗“初发”肾动脉病变方面优于球囊血管成形术,但ISR的最佳治疗方法仍不明确。

方法

在1997年1月至2006年8月期间,34例连续的ISR患者(41条肾动脉)由操作者酌情采用球囊血管成形术或重复支架置入术进行治疗。在干预前、干预后即刻以及随访时进行定量血管造影。75%的病变进行了血管造影随访以评估临床指征,95%的病变进行了常规无创随访成像。

结果

与单纯球囊血管成形术相比,重复肾动脉支架置入术显示出更好的通畅率,复发性ISR降低了58%(29.4%对71.4%,P = 0.02),随访时直径狭窄降低了30%(41%对58.2%,P = 0.03)。与单纯球囊血管成形术相比,重复支架组的二级通畅率也更好(P = 0.05),再次发生ISR的自由度更高(P = 0.01)。在免于靶血管再血管化(TVR)的累积自由度方面,有倾向于重复支架置入术的趋势(P = 0.08)。

结论

对于肾ISR的治疗,与单纯球囊血管成形术相比,重复支架置入术似乎能带来更好的通畅率。

相似文献

1
Optimal treatment of renal artery in-stent restenosis: repeat stent placement versus angioplasty alone.肾动脉支架内再狭窄的最佳治疗:再次支架置入与单纯血管成形术对比
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Apr 1;71(5):701-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21509.
2
A revisit: repeat stent placement versus angioplasty alone for renal in-stent restenosis.再探讨:肾支架内再狭窄的重复支架置入与单纯血管成形术对比
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Apr 1;71(5):706-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21570.
3
Treatment of reoccurring instent restenosis following reintervention after stent-supported renal artery angioplasty.支架辅助肾动脉血管成形术后再次干预后复发性支架内再狭窄的治疗。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Aug 1;70(2):296-300. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21170.
4
Management of in-sent restenosis after carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.高危患者颈动脉支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的管理。
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.040.
5
Ten-year experience with renal artery in-stent stenosis.肾动脉支架内狭窄的十年经验。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Apr;53(4):1026-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.10.092. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
6
Sirolimus-eluting stent placement for refractory renal artery in-stent restenosis: sustained patency and clinical benefit at 24 months.西罗莫司洗脱支架置入治疗难治性肾动脉支架内再狭窄:24个月时的持续通畅及临床获益
Vasc Med. 2009 Nov;14(4):361-4. doi: 10.1177/1358863X08102001.
7
Sirolimus-eluting versus bare-metal low-profile stent for renal artery treatment (GREAT Trial): angiographic follow-up after 6 months and clinical outcome up to 2 years.西罗莫司洗脱与裸金属低轮廓支架用于肾动脉治疗(GREAT试验):6个月后的血管造影随访及2年的临床结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2007 Aug;14(4):460-8. doi: 10.1177/152660280701400405.
8
Balloon-expandable covered stent therapy of complex endovascular pathology.球囊扩张式覆膜支架治疗复杂血管内病变
Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 Nov;22(6):762-8. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
9
Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Patients with Renal Artery Stenosis.肾动脉狭窄患者支架内再狭窄的治疗
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Nov;27(11):1657-1662. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.05.041. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
10
Treatment of renal artery in-stent restenosis with sirolimus-eluting stents.西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗肾动脉支架内再狭窄。
Vasc Med. 2010 Feb;15(1):3-7. doi: 10.1177/1358863X09106897. Epub 2009 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Technique of Stenting of the Renal Artery In-Stent Restenosis with GuideLiner® through Radial Approach.一种通过桡动脉途径使用GuideLiner®对肾动脉支架内再狭窄进行支架置入的新技术。
Case Rep Vasc Med. 2017;2017:1742058. doi: 10.1155/2017/1742058. Epub 2017 Jun 4.
2
Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Patients with Renal Artery Stenosis.肾动脉狭窄患者支架内再狭窄的治疗
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Nov;27(11):1657-1662. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.05.041. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
3
The current state of endovascular therapy in the evaluation and management of renovascular disease.
血管内治疗在肾血管疾病评估与管理中的现状
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2009 Dec;26(4):333-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1242202.
4
Cryoplasty for the treatment of in-stent renal artery stenosis?冷冻球囊血管成形术治疗支架内肾动脉狭窄?
Tex Heart Inst J. 2008;35(4):489-91; author reply 491.